首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union
Authors:Mustapha Sadni Jallab  James B Kobak Jr
Institution:1. Trade, Finance and Economic Development Division, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, P. O. Box 3005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2. African Trade Policy Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
3. Fordham Law School, New York, USA
Abstract:This paper discusses and develops certain observable indices of the nature and effects of dumping and antidumping policy. The object is to analyze each antidumping procedure introduced by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for the 1998–2001 period. Using conservative criteria, we find that 68.2% of the antidumping procedures introduced by the EU appear to have a questionable economic foundation, meaning that the identified factors suggest that the conduct challenged is unlikely to have any significantly anticompetitive effect. We similarly find a questionable economic foundation in 76% of the analyzed cases in the US. The recommendation that we propose is that it may be appropriate to modify the antidumping law to take into account at a preliminary stage the factors that may indicate the presence or absence of potential anticompetitive effects.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号