首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Privately Versus Publicly Held Asset Investment Performance
Authors:Timothy J Riddiough  Mark Moriarty  PJ Yeatman
Institution:University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Business, Madison, WI 53706, or .; Republic Properties, Boston, MA 02110, or .; Lubert-Adler Management, Philadelphia, PA 19103, or .
Abstract:Classic asset pricing is problematic as a method to assess privately held asset investment performance. We propose an alternative approach that involves adjusting the characteristics of assets constituting an index or portfolio to match the asset characteristics of a reference index or portfolio. This approach is applied to commercial real estate, where we create an index of REIT returns to compare to the NCREIF index. To enhance comparability, return indices are adjusted for partial-year financial data, leverage, asset mix and fees. Adjusted results over a 1980–1998 sample period show general convergence between the indices, although an annual return difference of over three percentage points remains in favor of public market asset ownership. Possible causes of the investment performance gap include liquidity and geography as missing risk factor adjustments, an unrepresentative sample period, and the form in which commercial real estate assets are held.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号