Is presidential cycle in security returns merely a reflection of business conditions? |
| |
Authors: | James R BoothLena Chua Booth |
| |
Institution: | a Department of Finance, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA b Department of World Business, Thunderbird, American Graduate School of International Management, 15249 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85306, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We confirm previous findings that both large-cap and small-cap stock returns in the US exhibit a presidential cycle pattern, i.e. returns are significantly higher in the last 2 years than in the first 2 years of the presidential term. We attempt to examine if this presidential cycle pattern can be explained away by the traditional business cycle proxies, namely the term spread (TERM), dividend yield (D/P), and default spread (DEF). Our motivation arises from the political business cycle theory that monetary and fiscal measures undertaken by presidents are usually translated into the business cycle. We find that the presidential cycle has explanatory power beyond business conditions proxies shown to be important in explaining stock returns. Tests of slope parameters show that stock returns are less sensitive to only the D/P during the last 2 years of the presidential term. The presidential cycle effect prevails even after controlling for the party in power and the incumbent versus nonincumbent presidents. |
| |
Keywords: | Presidential cycle Business cycle Monetary policy Stock returns Political business cycle |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|