首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


(In)equality and the South African Constitution
Authors:Catherine Albertyn
Institution:1. NRF South African Research Chair in Equality, Law and Social Justice, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africacathi.albertyn@wits.ac.zaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4182-5079
Abstract:ABSTRACT

Does the South African Constitution constrain or empower government, courts and citizens in addressing systemic social and economic inequalities? This article argues that the Constitution is explicitly ‘transformative’, but is an enabling document, providing ‘scaffolding’ for political and legal activities. It is government, strong institutions and civil society that are ultimately responsible for securing its equality aspirations. Here the Constitution admits of different understandings of equality and different economic and social policy choices. This article identifies these contested meanings of equality and suggests that a liberal egalitarian/social democratic version is dominant in policy choices and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. It illustrates this with reference to the Court’s jurisprudence on equality, and suggests that more radical and transformative interpretations remain possible. However, it concludes that we cannot escape politics, the need for good policy choices and effective implementation and enforcement.
Keywords:Constitutions  equality  courts  redistribution  social democracy  transformation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号