首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

诉讼风险、审计师选择与盈余质量
引用本文:邵毅平,李文贵.诉讼风险、审计师选择与盈余质量[J].财经论丛,2018(5):58-65.
作者姓名:邵毅平  李文贵
作者单位:浙江财经大学会计学院,浙江 杭州,310018
基金项目:浙江省哲学社科规划重点课题(17NDJC025Z),国家自然科学基金资助项目(71502161),教育部人文社科规划项目(15YJA630054)
摘    要:本文分析诉讼风险对企业审计师选择决策的影响及其经济后果.检验发现,面临更高诉讼风险的企业,选择高质量审计师的概率越低.同时,高诉讼风险企业披露的盈余信息质量显著更差.但是,如果高诉讼风险企业选择了高质量审计师,那么诉讼风险对盈余质量不再具有显著影响.这表明,高质量审计师能有效缓解诉讼风险对盈余质量的消极效应,提升高诉讼企业的信息披露质量.上述结论为诉讼风险的经济后果提供了新的解释,也进一步丰富和拓展了有关审计师选择决策影响因素的研究.

关 键 词:诉讼风险  审计师选择  盈余质量  Litigation  Risk  Auditor  Choice  Earnings  Quality

Litigation Risk,Auditor Choice and Earnings Quality
SHAO Yiping,LI Wengui.Litigation Risk,Auditor Choice and Earnings Quality[J].Collected Essays On Finance and Economics,2018(5):58-65.
Authors:SHAO Yiping  LI Wengui
Abstract:This paper analyzes the effect of litigation risk on firms' audit choice and its economic consequence. We find that there is a significantly negative relation between litigation risk and auditor choice,and the earnings quality of firms facing high litigation risk is much lower than that of other firms. Further tests demonstrate that if those firms facing high litigation risk could employ high-quality auditors,the litigation risk no longer has significant effect on their earnings quality. Those results show that firms facing high litigation risk prefer to employ low-quality auditors,but high-quality auditors are helpful for firms with high litigation risk to improve their earnings quality.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号