| 诡辞为用:牟宗三对向秀、郭象《庄子》注的诠释路径 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 程郁.诡辞为用:牟宗三对向秀、郭象《庄子》注的诠释路径[J].湖北经济学院学报,2011(6):116-123. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 程郁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学哲学系; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 牟宗三先生将道家思想中言说道体或境界的独特方式"正言若反"称为"诡辞为用",即辩证的诡辞,其作用在于不将所说内容予以实体化和对象化加以固定,而是从作用上活泼泼地展现出来。这一方法首先见于牟先生所揭示的《庄子》对于《老子》之道的发展中,其次则体现在向秀、郭象对《庄子》的注解中,同时也是牟先生用以诠释向秀、郭象注庄的方法论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诡辞 牟宗三 《庄子》注 诠释 |
The Application of Paradox:On Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Xiangxiu and Guoxiang's Annotation to Zhuangzi |
| |
| CHENG Yu.The Application of Paradox:On Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Xiangxiu and Guoxiang's Annotation to Zhuangzi[J].Journal of Hubei University of Economics,2011(6):116-123. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Yu |
| |
| Institution: | CHENG Yu(School of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Dao or the visionary mode(Jing-jie) is usually explained by Daoism in an unique way,what Mou Zongsan called the application of paradox,or the dialectic paradox,by which the truth frequently seems paradoxical.Instead of regarding Dao or the visionary mode as an objective substance,a dialectic paradox attempts to authentically manifest Dao in a functional level.Just as what Mou said,this method came originally from Zhuangzi;then we can find it in Xiangxiu and Guoxiang's annotation to Zhuangzi.And it was by th... |
| |
| Keywords: | paradox Mou Zongsan annotation to Zhuangzi interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
