首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effectiveness and safety of betrixaban extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism compared with standard-duration prophylaxis intervention in acute medically ill patients: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis
Authors:Vicki Laskier  Holly Guy  Mark Fisher  W Richey Neuman  Iwona Bucior  Alexander T Cohen
Institution:1. Health Economics, FIECON Ltd, St Albans, UK;2. vicki.laskier@fiecon.com;4. Medical Affairs, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA;5. Department of Haematological Medicine, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, King’s College London, London, UK
Abstract:Abstract

Aims: To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis using US- and Europe-approved anticoagulants relative to extended-duration VTE prophylaxis with betrixaban. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux sodium and placebo were each compared to betrixaban, as standard-duration VTE prophylaxis for hospitalized, non-surgical patients with acute medical illness at risk of VTE.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was conducted up to June 2019 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized, non-surgical patients with acute medical illness at risk of VTE. Studies that reported the occurrence of VTE events (including death) and, where possible, major bleeding, from treatment initiation to 20–50?days thereafter were retrieved and extracted. A Bayesian fixed effect network meta-analysis was used to estimate efficacy and safety of betrixaban compared with standard-duration VTE prophylaxis.

Results: Seven RCTs were analyzed which compared betrixaban, LMWHs, UFH, fondaparinux sodium, or placebo. There were significantly higher odds (median odds 95% credible interval]) of VTE with LMWHs (1.38 1.12–1.70]), UFH (1.60 1.05–2.46]), and placebo (2.37 1.55–3.66]) compared with betrixaban. There were significantly higher odds of VTE-related death with placebo (7.76 2.14–34.40]) compared with betrixaban. No significant differences were observed for the odds of major bleeding with all comparators, VTE-related death with any active standard-duration VTE prophylaxis, or of VTE with fondaparinux sodium, compared with betrixaban.

Limitations and conclusions: In this indirect comparison, betrixaban was shown to be an effective regimen with relative benefits compared with LMWHs and UFH. This indicates that betrixaban could reduce the burden of VTE in at-risk hospitalized patients with acute medical illness who need extended prophylaxis, though without direct comparative evidence, stronger conclusions cannot be drawn.
Keywords:Venous thromboembolism  pre-exposure thromboprophylaxis  network meta-analysis  primary thromboprophylaxis  betrixaban
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号