| Abstract: | Why would Hayek, the great critic of ‘rational constructivism’ and defender of spontaneous orders, think a transitional dictatorship could work? Here I attempt to dissect the alchemy of ‘turning a constitution into a can opener’ as Farrant &; McPhail (2014 Farrant, A., &; McPhail, E. (2014) Can a Dictator Turn a Constitution into a Can-opener: F. A. Hayek and the Alchemy of Transitional Dictatorship in Chile, Review of Political Economy, 26(3), pp. 331–348.Taylor &; Francis Online] , Google Scholar]) put it. Hayek argues against the imposition by an external source of order upon a society. He stresses the importance of an evolving culture and tradition, noting that they should be spontaneous orders not command systems, and that the culture of a society must be accepting and supportive of its institutions. Sometimes the culture is more important than the formal institutions of a society for efficiency. So why would Hayek argue that a transitional dictator could impose a constitution upon the people? It will be argued here that if Hayek had pursued the theoretical line set out in his Constitution of Liberty, he might have responded to the situation in Chile differently. |
