首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

商品契约优于要素契约——以农业产业化经营中的契约选择为例
引用本文:周立群,曹利群.商品契约优于要素契约——以农业产业化经营中的契约选择为例[J].经济研究,2002(1).
作者姓名:周立群  曹利群
作者单位:南开大学经济研究所 300071 (周立群),南开大学经济研究所 300071(曹利群)
基金项目:农业部软科学委员会研究课题“扶持产业化经营龙头企业的理论和政策依据”(编号 :0 10 19)的成果之一
摘    要:本文以农业产业化经营中的商品契约为例 ,说明商品契约完全有可能在长期内稳定 ,以至于足以保证龙头企业长期支配农户的土地和劳动力要素 ,从而达到与要素契约相同的效果。商品契约的稳定性主要是通过专用性投资和市场在确保履约方面的作用来实现的。这一结论在一定程度上证伪了科斯和张五常的一些看法。他们认为 ,企业和市场的区别就是要素契约和商品契约的区别。基于农业生产过程中的特殊性 ,单纯的要素契约很难在现阶段的农业生产过程中发挥作用 ,本文的结论不仅为农业产业化经营中的契约选择提供思路 ,也对中国农业发展的路径作了探讨。

关 键 词:商品契约  要素契约  龙头企业  农业产业化

Factor Contract is Superior to Commodity Contract
Zhou Liqun & Cao Liqun.Factor Contract is Superior to Commodity Contract[J].Economic Research Journal,2002(1).
Authors:Zhou Liqun & Cao Liqun
Abstract:This paper shows that a commodity contract in agribusiness may well be valid for a long time. This long-term validity ensures that leading firms make the allocation of farmers' land and labor factor. As a result, commodity contracts in reality have the same effect as factor contracts. The sustained validity of commodity contract is achieved through special investments and the binding power of the market force. Due to the special characteristics of agriculture, factor contract alone can have little effect in the agricultural process at the present stage. Our conclusion indicates that the views of Ronald Coase and Steve Cheung, both who argue that the difference between market and firm lies in the difference between commodity contracts and factor contracts, do not hold true. This conclusion not only provides a framework for the selection of contracts in agribusiness, but also explores the way forward for agriculture development in China.
Keywords:Factor contract  Commodity contract  Leading firm  Agribusiness integration
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号