权力场域：大学学术评价的统摄与旨归

权力场域对学术研究不断裹挟，使高等教育组织、研究机构及教师个体自由生产场域遭受到权力等级符号的统摄与规训。在其规制下，期刊级别、论文等级、项目层次、职称等级等评价符号严重钳制高校或科研机构学术生产内在特性的发挥，使学术研究与权力场域在不断媾和条件下，呈现出另一种评价机理：权力等级符号拥有交换功能，可以充当一般等价物与学术进行等值兑换；权力场域对学术研究的内在捆绑，不断诱导学术研究与权力等级场域符号相匹配，激励学术人为得到相应学术资本而努力；在权力等级符号视域下，当真实性学术与虚假性学术出现悖论时，其场域胁迫着学术研究步入一种真假难辨的迷途之中。鉴于此，构建风清气正的学术研究氛围、规避权力场域对学术评价的桎梏、实施学术评价结构性管理机制以及提高学术人的内在自律性等是加强对大学学术场域惯习引导的必要举措。

Power Field:the Domination and Purport of University Academic Evaluation

Due to the constant constraint of the power field on academic research, the free production field of higher education organizations, research institutions and individual teachers is subject to the control and discipline of the power hierarchy symbols. The evaluation symbols such as the differences of journals, the grades of papers, the levels of projects and the grades of professional titles under the regulation severely restrict the internal characteristics of academic production in universities or scientific research institutions, which makes another evaluation mechanism appear under the condition of the continuous development of academic research and power field. The rank symbol of power has the function of exchange, which can be used as the general equivalent to carry out equivalent exchange with the academic.The inner binding of the power field to academic research constantly induces its academic research to match the symbols of the power level field, in order to encourage them to get the corresponding academic capital; In the view of power hierarchy symbols, when there is a paradox between real and false scholarship, the field discipline academic research into a kind of stray.In view of this,it is necessary to strengthen the guidance of academic habitus to construct a clean and upright academic research atmosphere, avoid the shackles of the power field on academic evaluation, pay attention to the implementation of the structural management mechanism of academic evaluation, and improve the internal self-discipline of scholars.