政府干预、异质性组织交互对合作创新绩效的影响

已有研究缺乏对非企业创新主体等异质性组织参与合作创新过程及作用机理的考察。为了探索包括政府在内的异质性主体如何通过组织交互实现合作创新，提升政府干预效果，基于异质性理论研究创新网络中政府干预如何影响组织异质性与创新绩效的关系，并采用SPSS25.0及Process3.3对调研数据进行条件过程分析。结果发现，文化异质性、决策权力异质性及目标异质性均显著正向影响合作创新绩效；政府干预正向调节文化异质性与合作创新绩效的关系，但不能对决策权力异质性、目标异质性与合作创新绩效间的关系产生调节作用；组织交互部分中介组织异质性与合作创新绩效的关系；政府干预对“组织异质性—组织交互—合作创新绩效”路径存在正向调节作用，当组织交互的不同维度分别作为中介变量时，政府干预的调节效应与作用阶段存在显著差异。结果表明，政府干预并不总是有效。通过揭示组织异质性与合作创新绩效之间的关系，提出相关管理启示。

The Impact of Government Intervention and Organizational Heterogeneity Interaction on Cooperative Innovation Performance

Existing research lacks an investigation on the non-enterprise innovation entities and other heterogeneous organizations participating in the cooperative innovation process and the mechanism of action.In order to explore how heterogeneous subjects, including the government, can achieve cooperative innovation through inter-organizational interaction and enhance the effect of government intervention in cooperative innovation.Based on the heterogeneity theory, this paper studies how the government intervention in innovation network affects the relationship between organizational heterogeneity and innovation performance.SPSS25.0 and Process3.3 were used to analyze the data.The results show that: cultural heterogeneity, decision-making power heterogeneity and objective heterogeneity all have significant positive effects on cooperative innovation performance; government intervention positively moderates the relationship between cultural heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance, but doesn't moderate the relationship between decision-making power heterogeneity, objective heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance; organizational interaction mediates organizational heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance.The results reveal the existence of the positive moderating role of government intervention to the path of "organizational heterogeneity- organizational interaction-cooperative innovation performance", using different dimensions of organizational interaction as intermediary variables, the moderating effects of government intervention are different at each phases.The research shows that government intervention is not always effective.The research reveals the relationship between organizational heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance, and puts forward management implications based on the conclusions.