首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“双一流”大学科研创新评价体系建设的国际视野
引用本文:吴杨.“双一流”大学科研创新评价体系建设的国际视野[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(15):126-131.
作者姓名:吴杨
作者单位:北京理工大学 人文与社会科学学院,北京 100081
摘    要:科研评价是大学科研创新活动的风向标,健全的科研评价体系不仅为我国“双一流”大学建设提供保障,提高大学科研创新能力,而且为管理部门提供及时有效的科研发展信息。对英国、澳大利亚、日本以及韩国大学科研评价体系进行分析,综合比较其科研评价过程、评价指标及特点、评价结果与拨款关系等。在此基础上,根据我国实际情况,从目标导向、评价指标、评价专家、评价方法等4个方面设计完善我国大学科研评价体系政策,并提出未来研究展望。

关 键 词:“双一流”大学  大学科研评价  科研评价体系  国际比较  

An International Perspective on the Construction of Scientific Research Innovation Evaluation System of "Double Top" Universities
Wu Yang.An International Perspective on the Construction of Scientific Research Innovation Evaluation System of "Double Top" Universities[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2018,35(15):126-131.
Authors:Wu Yang
Abstract:The evaluation on research innovation is a beacon to the research innovation in university. It not only can improve the innovation ability and motivation of university research, but also can provide the administrative department timely information. At present, the research innovation evaluation system of university in China needs to be perfected. In order to do so, we should selective learn from the advanced experience of foreign university research evaluation. This article will analyze the characteristic of UK, Australia, Japan and South Korea. What's more, we will compare the research evaluation system on the university from scientific research evaluation process and evaluation method, evaluation index system and index characteristics, evaluation results grade and allocation relationship, etc. At last, this article will put forward policies and measures about university research innovation from evaluation goal oriented, evaluation index, evaluation expert, evaluation method and so on.
Keywords:"Double Top" University  University Research Evaluation  Research Evaluation System  International Comparison  
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号