Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;4. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, The Ministry of Education，Nanning 530001, China;5. Rural Development Institute, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China;1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;3. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;1. College of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China;2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, 210023, China;3. College of Rural Vitalization, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China;4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China;5. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, The Ministry of Education, Nanning, 530001, China;6. School of Tourism, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China;1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;2. College of Resources Science and Technology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;3. School of Public Management, Shandong University of Finance and Economic, Jinan 250014, China;1. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China;2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China;1. School of Public Management, Shandong University of Finance and Economic, Jinan, 250014, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China;3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, 250100, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper establishes the analytical framework of the driving mechanism of land use transitions on urban-rural integrated development. The evolution rules and spatio-temporal patterns of land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development in China were quantitatively analyzed using the methods of kernel density and spatial analysis. Furthermore, the relationship between land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development was tested by the econometric models based on China’s provincial panel data from 2005 to 2016. The results show that urban-rural integrated development is a process of the reconstruction of urban-rural values. It helps to promote the free flow and equal exchange of urban-rural development elements, and achieve the convergence of returns from urban-rural development elements. The effect of land use transitions on urban-rural integrated development requires to realize the rational distribution of land incremental value in urban-rural territory. Under ideal channels, it is supposed to promote urban-rural integrated development through income effect, resource effect and urbanization effect. But urban-rural dual institution, distorted land market and obstacles to social integration may distort the positive role of land use transitions. The degree of land use transitions presented a trend of “decrease first and then increase”, and urban-rural integrated development has been improved since 2005, both of which are characterized by spatial agglomeration. Currently, land use transitions have a negative impact on urban-rural integrated development. Accordingly, some implications are formulated for policy makers to improve urban-rural integrated development form the perspective of land use transitions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Urban-rural transformation development Urban-rural territorial system Policy-institution innovation Rural value Urban-rural relationship |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
