首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Motivations and experiences in managing rare semi-natural biotopes: A case from Finland
Institution:1. Aronia Research and Development Institute at Åbo Akademi University & Novia University of Applied Sciences, Raseborgsvägen 9, FI-10600 Ekenäs, Finland;2. University of Helsinki, Department of Agricultural Sciences, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland;1. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Via C. Balbo 16, I-00184 Rome, Italy;2. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Centre for the Study of Plant-Soil Interactions (CRA-RPS), Via della Navicella 2-4, I-00184 Rome, Italy;1. ETH Zurich, Institute for Landscape and Spatial Development, Planning of Landscape and Urban Systems (PLUS), Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland;2. Utah State University, Department of Sociology, Social Work & Anthropology, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, United States;1. INRA, UMR 1302 SMART, F-35000 Rennes, France;2. LEI - Wageningen UR, 29703, 2502 LS The Hague, The Netherlands;3. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy;4. INRA, US ODR, F-31326 Auzeville, France;1. Alterra Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. Remote Sensing Application Centre ReSAC, Tzar Assen Str. 61, Sofia, Bulgaria;1. CIBIO (Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) – InBIO (Research Network in Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology), University of Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, n° 7, 4485 661 Vairão, Portugal;2. Laboratorio do Territorio, Departamento de Enxeñería Agroforestal, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Escola Politécnica Superior de Enxeñería, Rúa Benigno Ledo s/n, 27002 Lugo, Spain;3. Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708NJ Wageningen, The Netherlands;4. Hill & Mountain Research Centre, Scotland’s Rural College, Kirkton Farm, Crianlarich, FK20 8RU, United Kingdom
Abstract:Traditional rural biotopes (TRBs) are semi-natural farmland habitats of high nature value formed through traditional agricultural activities, such as grazing and fodder collection. The aims of this study were to 1) understand manager motivations for managing TRBs and their attitudes toward TRB conservation and 2) determine whether TRB managers differ in attitude, motivation for management, experiences or area under management depending on whether their managed TRBs are integrated or separate from their farming systems. Farmers and landowners (N = 27) managing TRBs in coastal Finland were interviewed. In addition to quantitative analysis, responses were mapped with DebateGraph for inductive analysis to discern patterns amongst the two groups and to explore a series of questions related to motivations. Although area under management and farming strategy varied amongst managers, they all had a positive view toward the existential value of TRBs. A small group of “TRB entrepreneurs”, whose farming strategy was based on grazing primarily rented TRBs was identified. Their farming income was dependent upon direct sale of meat and participation in agri-environmental scheme for TRB management. Desire for open landscape was the primary motivation for managing TRBs and strongly outweighed extrinsic values such as fodder production and AES. Higher TRB: farm ratio was associated with more positive attitude toward TRBs and TRB conservation. No difference was found in motivation for management between the two farmer groups. Although motivations were similar, improved and tailored extension services for TRB managers could promote their conservation management.
Keywords:Semi-natural meadows  Traditional rural biotopes  Cultural landscape  High nature value farmland  Agri-environmental schemes  Farmer conservation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号