Land use planning policies and market forces: Utopian aspirations thwarted? |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Private Practice, Seattle, WA 98102, USA;2. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA;3. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;4. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA;1. School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;2. Cognitive Systems Group, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;3. School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK;4. Centre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;1. Institute for Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), C/ Albasanz 26-28, 28037 Madrid, Spain;2. Centre for the Study of Choice (CenSoC) and Department of Marketing, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), PO Box 123, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia;3. Forest Research Centre (CIFOR), National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA), Ctra. de La Coruña km. 7,5, 28040 Madrid, Spain;4. Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid-INIA, Avda. de Madrid 57, 34004 Palencia, Spain;1. Service de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU de Martinique, CS 90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique;2. DRCI, CHU de Martinique, CS 90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique;3. Service d’information médicale (DIM), CHU de Martinique, CS 90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique;4. Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Martinique, CS 90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper asks the question, to what extent do market forces limit planning policies? It delves into the constraining relationship of market forces on planning by reference to urban policies in the UK. In this context market forces are defined as dominant long term spatial economic trends which promote decentralisation. The essay uses policy case studies to develop its arguments. In general planning is shown to suffer from the lack of a systematic analysis of land use markets. Yet at its heart planning not only regulates/constrains the property market it also shapes and stimulates it. Planning is found to be most successful when it is shaping urban growth and decentralisation. It is a fundamentally different task to stem market flows and the probability of success is very different. Market forces do limit routes to Utopian aspirations but planners need the motivation, understanding and means to work with the market to produce desired outcomes. |
| |
| Keywords: | Planning Real estate Retailing Markets Housing Regeneration |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
