首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

借鉴美欧经验思考中国的反倾销法
引用本文:邵桂兰,胡家强.借鉴美欧经验思考中国的反倾销法[J].中央财政金融学院学报,2003(7):45-47.
作者姓名:邵桂兰  胡家强
作者单位:中国海洋大学青岛266071
摘    要:通过比对研究发现,美国、欧盟反倾销法在“非市场经济国家出口产品正常价值的确定”、“公共利益的考虑”、“对出口商替进口商交纳反倾销税的作弊行为的制裁”、“反规避的措施”和“承诺”问题上存在微妙差异,而这几个问题在我国反倾销法中或未涉及,或阐述较为粗略。研究这些差异。将有助于完善我国反倾销法以及更好地应对美国、欧盟反倾销调查。

关 键 词:正常价值  公共利益  反规避  承诺  中国  美国  欧盟  反倾销法
文章编号:1000-1549(2003)07-0045-03

The Thought the Anti-dumping Laws of China from on the U.S.A and the E.U Experience
SHAO Gui-lan,HU Jia-qiang.The Thought the Anti-dumping Laws of China from on the U.S.A and the E.U Experience[J].Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics,2003(7):45-47.
Authors:SHAO Gui-lan  HU Jia-qiang
Institution:SHAO Gui-lan HU Jia-qiang
Abstract:By comparison and analysis, we find that there are some microdifferences on some problems in the anti-dumping laws in the U S A and in the E U , such as: the confirmation on normal value of the exports from the non-market economy countries, the consideration on public interests, the punishments on cheats that taxes of anti-dumping are paid by exportors instead of importors, the measures of anti-escaping and the promise Yet, these problems are not concerned or are elaborated simply in the anti-dumping laws of P R China By researching these differences, we can consummate our anti-dumping laws and we can benefit a lot when facing anti-dumping investigation from the U S A and the E U
Keywords:Normal value  Public interests  Anti-escaping  Promise  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号