首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Was audit quality of Laventhol and Horwath poor?
Authors:Kam-Wah Lai  Ferdinand A Gul
Institution:1. School of Accounting and Finance, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong;2. Faculty of Business and Accounting, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abstract:Laventhol and Horwath (L&H), the then seventh largest accounting firm in the US, declared bankruptcy in November 1990. The firm claimed that its bankruptcy was due to the perception of it being a deep pocket rather than inherent deficiencies in its performance. In this study, we examine whether the audit quality of L&H was lower than other auditors. Results do not show that L&H is associated with lower quality audits either in terms of lower likelihood of issuing modified audit opinion, higher levels of discretionary accruals for its clients, or lower predictability of discretionary accruals for future non-discretionary net income for its clients than for clients of other auditors. Results of additional tests also do not suggest that auditors that take up clients of L&H report differently from L&H. This evidence does not support the proposition that L&H’s audit quality was less than audit quality of other audit firms during the period leading up to the bankruptcy.
Keywords:Laventhol and Horwath  Audit quality  Modified opinion  Discretionary accruals
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号