Further critical reflections on a contribution to the methodological issues debate in accounting |
| |
| Authors: | Sonja Gallhofer Jim Haslam Akira Yonekura |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom;2. Durham University, United Kingdom;3. Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom;1. Professor of Accounting, Royal Holloway, University of London, United Kingdom;2. Emeritus Professor, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom;1. IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS), 3 rue de la Digue, 59000 Lille, France;2. Ghent University, 7 Sint-Pietersplein, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;1. School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand;2. Queen''s University, Belfast, United Kingdom;3. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand;4. Portland State University, Portland, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | Laughlin's (1995) contribution to the methodological issues debate in accounting (Laughlin R. Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle-range” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995;8(1):53–87.) is often cited. Here, we assess and clarify the contribution, including in reflecting upon some critical reception. We initially provide an overview of Laughlin (1995), enhancing appreciation of this by relating it to prior work. We then appraise some previous critical assessments of Laughlin (1995) and take into consideration Laughlin's interaction therewith. We go on to elaborate our own critical appreciation. We conclude that Laughlin (1995) substantively provides for a number of insights that continue to be positive for the development of research into accounting and related practices. Developing our analysis, we indicate the continuing strengths of a German critical theoretical orientation in researching and developing theoretical appreciation of accounting and related practices today. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
