首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Credit Risk Versus Capital Requirements under Basel II: Are SME Loans and Retail Credit Really Different?
Authors:Tor Jacobson  Jesper Lindé  Kasper Roszbach
Institution:(1) Research Division, Sveriges Riksbank, SE 103 37 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract:Under Basel II, retail and SME credit (R&SME) receive special treatment because of a supposedly smaller exposure to systemic risk. Most research on this issue has been based on parameterized credit risk models. We present new evidence by applying Carey's (Carey, Mark. “Credit Risk in Private Debt Portfolios.” Journal of Finance 53, no. 4 (1998), 1363–1387.) nonparametric Monte-Carlo resampling method to two banks' complete loan portfolios. By exploiting that a sub-sample of all borrowers has been assigned an internal rating by both banks, we can compare the credit loss distributions for the three credit types, and compute both economic and regulatory capital under Basel II. We also test if our conclusions are sensitive to the definitions of R&SME credit. Our findings show that R&SME portfolios are usually riskier than corporate credit. Special treatment under Basel II is thus not justified. JEL classification: C14, C15, G21, G28, G33.
Keywords:Internal ratings  credit risk  Value-at-Risk  banks  Basel II  retail credit  SME credit  corporate credit  regulatory capital  economic capital
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号