首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


On short-term institutional trading skill,behavioral biases,and liquidity need
Institution:1. Department of Finance, Insurance and Business Law, Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;2. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Özyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey;3. Department of Finance and Business Law, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA;4. Department of Finance, Palumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA
Abstract:Are portfolio managers skilled or do they trade too much? Using a marked-to-market based “fair-value” method for measuring fund manager skill, we find that institutional managers can potentially earn +42 (+33) basis points benchmark-adjusted return before transaction costs after a holding period of four weeks on their buy (sell) trades. After transaction costs, the benchmark-adjusted return for the buy (sell) trades is +1 (-8) basis points. Pension fund managers outperform money managers. We are unable to detect evidence for overconfidence among pension fund managers over this short-horizon. In addition, we are unable to find evidence of disposition effect among mutual fund managers. Institutions tend to engage in short-term trades with holding period of four weeks (or less) despite only breaking-even or making economically insignificant (modest) benchmark-adjusted losses after round-trip transaction costs for liquidity, risk-management, or tax-minimization reasons. Among these, evidence for liquidity trading motive is the strongest.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号