首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Bequest motive,information transparency,and family firm value: A natural experiment
Institution:1. Department of Accountancy, Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;2. Accounting and Finance Division, Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester M15 6PB, UK;1. Goethe University, Faculty of Economics and Business, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3, Frankfurt am Main 60323, Germany;2. Copenhagen Business School, Department of Finance, Copenhagen, Denmark;3. Goethe University, Faculty of Economics and Business, Frankfurt am Main, Germany;1. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2012 Steinberg-Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;2. China Europe International Business School (CEIBS), 699, Hongfeng Road, 201206 Shanghai, PR China;3. NYU Stern School of Business, 40 West 4th St., New York, NY 10012, USA
Abstract:Motivated by Cao et al. (2015), we utilize China’s one-child policy reform as a unique and exogenous setting to examine the economic impact of a potential rise in bequest motives among family firms, which is driven by the prospect of family and clanship expansion after the reform. A bequest motive is the economic incentive to accumulate wealth presently for inheritance by heirs in the future. It causes short-term present economic decisions to be influenced by long-term future utility expectations. On the one hand, the reform may strengthen stewardship as a means to maximize firm value for present family wealth enhancement and future inter-generational succession. On the other hand, the reform may weaken innovation and competitiveness by inducing reluctance against takeovers or outsider succession. Consistent with a positive economic impact, we observe that family firms experience (i) favorable ex-ante market reactions to the news of the reform and (ii) ex-post decline in managerial expropriation through tunneling after the reform. These findings of ex-ante investor anticipation and ex-post real effect are both stronger among less transparent family firms where Type-II agency problems are likely to be more pronounced. Further analyses also provide supportive evidence of a post-reform rise in the long-term value, measured by Tobin’s Q, and a decline in stock-selling by controlling shareholders among family firms. Our combined findings imply that this reform could induce positive externality on family firm governance.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号