首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Bank monitoring incentives and optimal ABS
Institution:1. Economics Department, University of Leuven, Belgium;2. Economics Department, University of Arizona, and NBER Research Associate, United States;3. Economics Department, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and NBER Research Associate, United States;1. Department of Finance, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States;2. Department of Finance, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands;1. University of South Carolina, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, United States; European Banking Center, the Netherlands;2. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, United States;3. Lancaster University & CEPR, U.K.;1. Lumsa University, Rome;2. Michigan State University, Department of Economics, Marshall-Adams Hall, 486 W Circle Dr. Rm 110, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;3. Luiss University, Rome
Abstract:The paper examines a continuous-time delegated monitoring problem between competitive investors and an impatient bank monitoring a pool of long-term loans subject to Markovian “contagion.” Moral hazard induces a foreclosure bias unless the bank is compensated with the right incentive-compatible contract. Fees are paid when the bank’s performance is on target and liquidation arises when the bank’s performance is sufficiently poor. I show that the optimal contract can be implemented with a whole loan sale involving both credit risk retention based on ABS credit default swaps and credit enhancement in the form of a reserve account. The optimal securitization bears out rulemaking recently proposed in the wake of the Dodd-Frank Act on a number of controversial provisions. I argue that further efficiency gains could be reaped by extending the role of the “premium capture” account into a liquidity buffer capturing performance-based compensation as a way of increasing skin in the game over the life of the transaction.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号