首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国会计准则国际协调效果量化研究述评
引用本文:曲晓辉,高芳.我国会计准则国际协调效果量化研究述评[J].会计研究,2006(2):14-18.
作者姓名:曲晓辉  高芳
作者单位:1. 厦门大学会计发展研究中心
2. 厦门大学会计系,361005
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目阶段性成果,项目批准号:70572091,教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目阶段性成果,项目批准号:05JJD630030。
摘    要:近年来,检验我国会计准则国际协调效果的量化研究日益增多,但由于研究的切入点、样本、变量及期间的选择和采用的方法不同,结论存在诸多差异甚至相互矛盾,以致这些研究的理论价值和现实意义有待于深入探讨。本文首次系统地分类探讨我国会计准则国际协调效果的量化研究,从我国会计准则与国际会计准则具体条款的协调程度,以及基于我国会计准则和国际会计准则编制的会计报表数据差异、会计信息含量差异和会计盈余质量差异四个方面,对我国会计准则国际协调效果量化研究的文献进行了回顾,最后对全文进行了总结并对后续研究提出建设性意见。

关 键 词:会计准则  国际协调  效果  量化研究

The harmonization effect of China accounting standards with international accounting standards: a review of quantitative research
Qu Xiaohui,Gao Fang.The harmonization effect of China accounting standards with international accounting standards: a review of quantitative research[J].Accounting Research,2006(2):14-18.
Authors:Qu Xiaohui  Gao Fang
Abstract:In recent years,quantitative studies for the harmonization effect of China accounting standards (CAS) with International Accounting Standard(IAS)have increased rapidly.However,there exist many differences and even conflicts of the conclusions in the key points,sample and variable selection and period,and methods adapted.Those thus make the academic contributions and practical value of the studies debatable.This paper reviews the literature on quantitative research related to the harmonization effect of CAS with IAS from the following four aspects:the harmonization degree of the items in specific standards,the comparison of accounting numbers,the differences of the accounting information content,and the differences in the quality of reported earnings based on both CAS and IAS.The review explores the development and limitations of these studies in order to benefit the international development of CAS.This paper also puts forward suggestions for future research.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号