| 我国要约规制型消费者冷静期制度的反思与完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许,丹,琳.我国要约规制型消费者冷静期制度的反思与完善[J].财经理论与实践,2020(6):149-154. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许 丹 琳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （贵州财经大学 文法学院，贵州 贵阳 550025） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 冷静期制度的建立能够为消费者提供更全面的保障，以其类型化为基础，我国新《消法》（《消费者权益保护法》，简称《消法》）第25条针对其中的要约型作出规定。自新《消法》实施以来，制度的积极作用毋庸置疑，但通过对立法的分析反思可知，仍存在适用范围局限、对象模糊、部分规则缺乏可操作性等问题。是故，在制度的未来改进中，可通过对第25条进行再解释，从适用范围及对象的应然界定与行使规则的细化等方面出发探讨制度完善的可能路径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 消费者保护 制度类型化 要约规制 信息不对称 |
Reflection and Improvement of the Offer Regulation Cooling-off Periods |
| |
| XU,Danlin.Reflection and Improvement of the Offer Regulation Cooling-off Periods[J].The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics,2020(6):149-154. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Danlin |
| |
| Abstract: | The cooling-off period is a system of consumer protection. On the basis of different types of information asymmetry, the adjustment objects of the calm period system can be divided into two types. Article 25 of the consumer protection law in China focuses on the offer regulation type. This system is effective, but reflection on the practice of legislation, there are still many problems. Therefore, article 25 can be reinterpreted in the future improvement of the system. Through by means of determining the scope of application and refine legal norms to improve the system. |
| |
| Keywords: | consumer protection researches on types offer regulation information asymmetry |
|
| 点击此处可从《财经理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《财经理论与实践》下载免费的PDF全文 |
