知识共享视角下的企业自主创新能力提升策略研究

企业自主创新能力是企业提高自身竞争能力的重要保障。当前,信息的交流不断加快,实现知识共享,促进企业发展是大势所趋。知识共享对企业自主创新能力的提高非常有帮助,在促进企业自主创新能力方面,不断构建利于知识共享的激励机制、组织结构、企业文化,是我国知识共享的环境下提升企业自主创新能力的重要途径。     

项目驱动型企业知识共享的障碍因素分析

战略管理和项目管理在项目驱动型企业管理中起关键作用,项目驱动型企业内部知识共享包括知识拥有者的知识外化行为和知识获取者的知识内化行为两个子过程.影响项目驱动型企业知识共享的因素主要包括知识本身的特性、组织结构、企业文化和信息技术等方面.相应的,促进项目驱动型企业知识共享的对策有,建立有效的知识共享的技术手段和平台、重构组织结构、建立内在激励机制和建立有利于知识共享的企业文化环境等.     

浅论知识共享的障碍及对策

知识经济时代,信息已成为企业获取竞争优势的关键,知识共享是企业获取信息的最佳路径,知识共享是一个知识再生产、知识更新的过程,其实质是组织层次的学习。组织实施知识共享可促进组织成员知识更新;增加组织知识资本的总量,并丰富组织知识资本的结构,从而增加组织的服务能力,实现员工与组织的互动,增强组织的综合竞争力．本文通过分析组织共享的障碍,提出一系列的解决对策,促进组织更好的实现知识共享。     

企业组织行为分析

在全球化背景下,为了实现全球范围的规模经济,克服全球范围内的不确定性,并实现分布在世界各地的经营单位之间的协作,企业必须建立有效的组织结构来降低各地业务单位的沟通和协调成本。此外,企业必须有能力整合来自不同单位的知识,并不断发展组织知识资源以供各业务单位使用和彼此共享。这就需要组织具有柔性,需要组织具有保持稳定与流动状态之间的平衡能力。本文通过迅达电梯公司这样一个案例来对企业组织行为进行分析,探讨组织行为与企业机制之间的联系。     

组织结构、信息体制与企业内部控制模式研究——基于知识共享理论的分析

内部控制作为企业内部重要的激励约束制度安排,既是知识共享体系的重要组成部分,同时又是实现企业内部知识共享的重要平台,这个体系的设置和平台作用的发挥受到众多因素的影响。不同的企业环境会影响企业的组织结构和信息体制,而组织结构和信息体制又直接影响知识共享,最终影响内部控制的构造与模式选择。     

企业内部知识共享的障碍及对策

本文通过对企业内部知识共享的障碍因素进行分析,有针对性地从管理体制、组织结构、企业文化三方面提出了促进企业内部知识共享的对策。     

论企业组织资本增长过程中的知识共享机制

为减轻个体人力资本流失给企业带来的损失,将个体人力资本不断转化为企业组织资本,使企业组织资本不断增长,成为在知识经济条件下企业日益重视的焦点问题。知识共享机制是个体人力资本向企业组织资本转化过程中的核心机制。本文将重点研究知识共享机制在企业组织资本增长过程中的作用原理,并在此基础上探讨构建知识共享机制的促进性因素。     

知识管理对人力资本的管理策略

一、　引言 现代社会已经由后工业社会进入知识经济社会。知识经济是指基于知识、信息的生产、分配和使用的经济。在知识经济时代，组织的知识管理水平与能力成为决定一个组织竞争力的关键要素。知识管理是把知识资本作为发展的基础，通过不断地进行知识创新来获得效益。然而，在知识管理的初期，知识共享还没有成为一种自觉、自然的行为，必须对人力资本进行有效的管理，才能使员工创新知识、共享知识和应用知识。 根据知识管理的要求，企业应充分认识到人力资源是经济发展的第一资源，彻底破除人事管理的老路子，必须把人力资源当作人…     

知识管理背景下团队知识共享的动力及实现机制

当今这个知识经济时代,科技成为第一生产力,越来越多的企业开始提出团队合作的发展方向。而在如今竞争日益激烈的大环境下,团队知识就变成了团队合作中最有价值的无形资产,也成为企业的核心竞争力。团队知识,因其战略新资源和核心生产要素的身份,它的地位在企业的发展中日益重要,越来越多的企业已经意识到团队知识的重要性,为了提升自身的竞争优势,企业开始走上了一条知识共享管理的道路。近来,越来越多的学者在对知识共享的研究方面也开始把关注的焦点由以前的组织间知识共享转变为组织内部知识共享.对于企业来说,组织内部的知识共享无论是提升企业的竞争优势,还是保证企业的持续发展都存在着积极作用。因此,促进知识在组织内部的不同部门和人员间进行共享,以及合理开发和运用蕴藏于组织内部的无形资产,成为企业竞争制胜的关键因素。由此可见,研究团队知识共享的动力及实现机制具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。     

企业营销创新中真实型领导与创新绩效的关系研究

本文在相关文献研究与实际调研的基础上,建立了企业营销创新中包含真实型领导、组织氛围、隐性知识共享以及创新绩效之间相互关系的结构方程模型,并以246家企业为样本对其进行了实证检验。研究发现,企业营销创新中真实型领导对组织氛围和隐性知识共享有正向的显著影响,组织氛围对隐性知识共享有正向的显著影响,组织氛围和隐性知识共享对创新绩效有正向的显著影响,组织氛围及隐性知识共享在真实型领导和创新绩效之间发挥了完全的中介作用。这一结论进一步丰富了真实型领导理论,为企业真实型领导的实施提供了一种新思路。     

虚拟供应链合作伙伴的知识共享模式研究

知识在虚拟供应链合作伙伴中的共享和传播是供应链知识管理的核心内容。本文根据对供应链企业间知识共享微观机制的认识,分析了知识共享障碍,在此基础上,提出了虚拟供应链合作伙伴基于知识共享的系统结构,并进一步探讨了其知识共享的策略。     

组织内部知识共享影响因素研究与分析

知识共享是组织内部知识管理的重要环节,是企业持续成长的关键和持续竞争优势的源泉。知识共享包括知识发送和知识接受两个过程,由知识拥有者和知识接受者共同完成,其中共享知识特征,知识提供方特征,知识接受者特征,知识共享情境特征,团队知识共享文化、知识共享机制等是影响知识共享的主要因素。     

Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs

Web 2.0 technologies are increasingly being used within all knowledge management processes. This paper extends previous studies on the use of internet technologies and knowledge management by analyzing factors affecting knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing upon the technology-organization-environment framework, a model is developed to examine how distinct contextual factors influence the use of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing. A data set of Spanish SMEs is used to test the conceptual model and hypotheses. Results show that knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies emerges from internal organizational and technological resources rather than from external pressure.     

供应链知识共享代理关系及其支付机制

作为供应链整合知识资源,知识共享是提高整体竞争力的重要手段,本质是供应链企业间的一种合约关系。由于信息的不对称性,导致了市场条件下供应链知识共享制度的失灵。运用委托代理理论,供应链中需求知识的企业和供给知识的企业在合约中不同权利的安排,建立一种有效率的知识共享制度,构建供应链知识共享的支付模型,旨在实现不同信息结构下合约的最优支付机制。     

To Share or Not to Share: Assessing Knowledge Sharing, Interemployee Helping, and Their Antecedents Among Online Knowledge Workers

Sharing and helping are important issues in ethical research. This study proposes a model based on flow theory by postulating key antecedents as the critical drivers of knowledge sharing and interemployee helping. Flow is the holistic sensation that employees feel when they act with total immersion and engagement, facilitating individuals’ reciprocal activities such as knowledge sharing and interemployee helping. In the proposed model, knowledge sharing is influenced by flow experience directly and also indirectly via the mediation of interemployee helping. Accordingly, the flow experience is influenced simultaneously by four exogenous factors related to individuals’ perception about their work: work skills, self-fulfillment in challenges, perceived control, and vividness. This study contributes to the knowledge management literature by extending flow theory to the area of knowledge sharing and interemployee helping, by validating idiosyncratic antecedent drivers of the flow theory, and by performing a practical operationalization of the flow experience. This research also provides managerial implications for business leaders to boost their employees’ ethical behavior in terms of sharing and helping.     

On the different “worlds” of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices

This qualitative field study investigated cross-site knowledge sharing in a small sample of multinational corporations in three different MNC business contexts (global, multidomestic, transnational). The results disclose heterogeneous “worlds” of MNC knowledge sharing, ultimately raising the question as to whether the whole concept of MNC knowledge sharing covers a sufficiently unitary phenomenon to be meaningful. We derive a non-exhaustive typology of MNC knowledge-sharing practices: self-organizing knowledge sharing, technocratic knowledge sharing, and best practice knowledge sharing. Despite its limitations, this typology helps to elucidate a number of issues, including the latent conflict between two disparate theories of MNC knowledge sharing, namely “sender–receiver” and “social learning” theories (Noorderhaven & Harzing, 2009). More generally, we develop the term “knowledge contextualization” to highlight the way that firm-specific organizational features pre-define which knowledge is considered to be of special relevance for intra-organizational sharing.     

To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing,Its Mediators and Antecedents

Tacit knowledge sharing discussed in this study is important in the area of business ethics, because an unwillingness to share knowledge that may hurt an organization’s survival is seen as being seriously unethical. In the proposed model of this study, distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly via two mediators: organizational commitment and trust in co-workers. Accordingly, instrumental ties and expressive ties influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly only via the mediation of trust in co-workers. The model is assessed by using data from different companies’ employees, who attend an evening college in Taiwan for advance study. The test results of this study indicate that tacit knowledge sharing is affected by distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness indirectly via organizational commitment. Additionally, tacit knowledge sharing is also affected by distributive justice, instrumental ties, and expressive ties via trust in co-workers. The paths from procedural justice and cooperativeness to trust in co-workers are shown to be insignificant. Managerial implications of the empirical findings are also provided. Chieh-Peng Lin is an Assistant Professor in the Graduate School of Business and Management, Vanung University, Taiwan. He had performed international business practices for several years and now focuses on the research related to consumer and organizational behaviors. His work has been published in a variety of journals including Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, and so on.     

完全信息条件下企业内部知识共享激励机制研究

基于委托代理理论和企业内部知识共享过程中所呈现的完全信息特征,构建了完全信息条件下企业内部知识共享多阶段激励机制模型。通过最优化一阶条件分别求解员工风险中性与风险规避时的最优激励机制,并分析最优激励机制的特点。研究结果表明:在完全信息条件下的企业内部知识共享过程中企业设计强制合同,帕累托最优合同可以实现,当员工为风险中性时,员工承担全部风险;当员工为风险规避时,员工不承担风险。     

Customer Participation and Project Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing in the Chinese Telecommunication Service Industry

Purpose: Extant literature has devoted more attention to customer value co-creation and knowledge sharing, not only in business-to-customer (B2C) markets, but also in business-to-business (B2B) markets. This study explores and examines the antecedents and consequences of customer knowledge sharing in the context of B2B markets by applying the motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) framework.

Methodology/Approach: This empirical study involves two structured surveys of project managers from both suppliers (n = 213) and customers (n = 312), which were conducted in the context of the Chinese telecommunication service industry. The conceptual model of this study was subsequently tested by developing Partial Least Squares (PLS) based structural equation models.

Findings: It was found that customer knowledge sharing is facilitated by four MOA factors: customer orientation, customer perceived benefits, customer socialization, and customer technological capability. It was determined that knowledge sharing has a direct and significant effect on project performance. Furthermore, the study revealed that such relationships vary across suppliers and customers.

Research Implications: This study extends the existing research stream of interfirm knowledge sharing by examining the antecedents and consequences of customer knowledge sharing from dual perspectives of customers and suppliers, and sheds light on the benefits of customer knowledge sharing. The dyadic perspective embodied in this design facilitates our understanding and management of knowledge sharing between organizations.

Originality/Value/Contribution: This article provides an important contribution to the existing literature of customer knowledge sharing by revealing how to effectively facilitate interorganizational knowledge sharing, particularly knowledge from customers to suppliers, and discovers conditions under which customers are more likely to exchange information, and share knowledge with their suppliers from the dyadic perspective.