试论农村会计概念框架的构建

为了使农村会计也像企业会计一样尽快走上正轨,本文针对我国制定农村会计概念框架的相关问题进行了研究。就建立农村会计概念框架的必要性、构建原则等进行了初步探讨,界定了农村会计概念框架的具体内容,对相关问题提出了自己的建议。     

试论农村会计概念框架的构建

为了使农村会计也像企业会计一样尽快走上正轨,本文针对我国制定农村会计概念框架的相关问题进行了研究,界定了农村会计概念框架的具体内容,对相关问题提出了自己的建议。     

会计计量发展对财务会计概念框架的影响

会计的发展主要受环境因素制约,而且这种发展又总是寓于对“传统”的不断否定和不断更新之中。财务会计概念框架虽然是新生事物,但其内容却是对传统会计理论基础的最好概括。一般意义上的传统会计是面向过去,分别以权责发生制、复式记帐、历史成本为确认、记录和计量基础的会计。但是,市场经济不断出现的新情况（如物价变动、创新金融工具、自创商誉）对传统会计理论产生了冲击,而作为理论核心的会计计量更是首当其冲。众所周知,会计计量包括三个要素:计量对象、计量单位和计量属性。会计计量的发展主要围绕这三个要素的发展并伴随着计量技…     

论中国政府会计概念框架的选择

对政府会计概念框架具体要素的选择进行研究将有助于推进政府会计改革和提升公共治理效率。本文借鉴已有的理论研究成果和国际组织及改革先行国家的实践经验,探讨我国政府会计概念框架结构选择,并对概念框架各个具体要素的内容提出我们的观点,试图为我国政府会计改革以及服务于透明高效政府的建设提供有益参考。     

建立我国独立税务会计的思考

目前,我国实行的财务会计与税务会计的混合模式,影响了财务会计信息和税务会计信息的质量,进而影响了会计目标的实现,因此,我国应尽快确立以所得税和增值税为主体的复合制独立税务会计模式,构建我国税务会计概念框架,建立我国税务会计账簿体系.     

构建政府会计概念框架研究

建立以政府会计目标为逻辑起点的政府会计概念框架,是政府会计理论建设的需要,是制定政府会计管理模式的需要,也是中国与国际政府会计协调的需要。本文拟就如何建立政府会计概念框架的几个主要问题．谈些看法。     

中美财务会计概念框架比较

随着我国市场经济的发展,对会计的要求也发生着变化,2006年我国发布的《企业会计准则一基本准则》,既是与国际会计惯例的趋同,同时又具有中国特色,亦可看作我国的财务概念框架.本文主要通过对年美两国财务会计概念框架的比较,来分析两个框架的异同以及美国对我国概念框架的借鉴意义.     

建立我国准备会计概念框架的设想

随着会计发展时间、空间的多维化,会计发展的分支不断细化,准备会计应运而生。本文主要就建立我国准备会计概念框架谈些初步设想,以帮助报表的编制者和审计人员对这一新问题做出初步的分析。 一、准备会计及其概念框架 准备会计是以计提的各项准备事项为研究对象,在充分考虑其不确定性因素对所呈报会计要素的影响下,在合理     

应计导向政府会计模式的概念框架比较研究--以美国、澳大利亚联邦政府会计为例

20世纪80年代以来,会计基础的选择问题因其对政府财务报告的深刻影响而成为世界各国政府会计变革的焦点.新西兰、澳大利亚、美国、英国、西班牙等国家的中央(联邦)和地方政府会计在不同程度上导入和推行了应计制.从政府会计概念框架的综合有效性出发,对美国和澳大利亚两国联邦政府会计概 念框架进行比较后发现,他们之间存在许多重大差异和分歧.     

The Conceptual Framework of Resource Accounting

This article explains the underlying principles of resource accounting in UK central government and some of the theoretical and practical complications involved in meeting the requirement that it should be based on company accounting. The author argues that the principles of resource accounting are very different from those underlying company accounting, and that accounting for the effects of changes in the general level of prices might be being stifled only because there is no parallel in company accounting. The implication is that competition will arise between resource accounting and company accounting for dominance.     

政府会计概念框架结构研究

本文从基本理论上探讨政府会计概念框架应该回答的问题,从多个国家及国际组织公共部门会计概念框架的对比中寻找灵感,从企业会计概念框架中吸取养分,借助政府会计概念框架整体分析模型构建我国政府会计概念框架结构,试图为我国政府会计概念框架的建设提供有益的借鉴。     

A Conceptual Framework for Learning Management Accounting

This paper demonstrates how Schoenfeld's ( 1985 ) conceptual framework for mathematics can provide an alternate framework for learning and thereby teaching management accounting. The four‐part framework—heuristics, resources, beliefs, and controls—is a refinement to problem‐based learning with three attributes in regard to management accounting. First, all aspects for teaching management accounting are integrated into a single framework or theory. Consistency among all parts of management accounting clarifies student and instructor roles in the learning process. Second, the framework's problem‐solving focus with linkages to explanatory materials or resources allows students to be rigorously informed about the functionality of management accounting heuristics. Third, transition or extension of relatively simple, standard problems to more complex nonstandard problems or cases is facilitated by introducing appropriate beliefs and controls. In effect, this approach enables management accounting, and particularly case analysis, to be taught with more structure.     

Testing and Evaluating a Conceptual Framework of Accounting

As a step toward developing a widely accepted theory to guide the standards-making process and the accounting profession, the Financial Accounting Standards Board submitted a conceptual framework to the profession for its consideration. Its purpose is to provide guidance in the choice among alternative accounting methods for an issue. Whether the conceptual framework performs its function can be objectively evaluated only when it is applied to issues and tested through a rigorous procedure. A rigorous procedure to evaluate a theory has two conceptually distinguishable but interrelated parts: (a) testing the set of sentences constituting the logical structure of the theory and its inferences by way of mathematical or logical proofs, and (b) evaluating the content of the sentences constituting the theory and its inferences by way of evidence, be it empirical, intuitive, or otherwise. The purpose of this study is to test the logical structure of the conceptual framework. The results of the study provide a demonstration that the structure of the conceptual framework is logically consistent and that inferences from the structure of the conceptual framework to alternative methods for an issue are deductively valid. The study also exemplifies an application of the structure of the conceptual framework in the selection of an alternative method for an issue. The application explicitly interrelates the structure and content of the conceptual framework.     

A Conceptual Framework for Accounting for Public-Benefit Entities

There is a renewed impetus in the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) to develop a conceptual framework for financial reporting for both private sector and public-benefit entities. This article takes stock of some of the key issues related to this endeavour with particular emphasis on what the objectives should be and whether it is possible to have one conceptual framework for all entities.     

财务会计概念框架的国际趋同动态

一、FASB与IASB启动概念框架趋同联合项目的背景众所周知,概念框架是制定和评估会计准则的理论基础。各国制定会计准则的指导思想、基本理念、目标和原则都体现在其各自的概念框架之中。概念框架之间是否存在重大差异将直接影响到依其制定的会计     

Applying Conceptual Framework Principles to Superannuation1 Fund Accounting

The Australian accounting standard AAS 25, Financial Reporting by Superannuation Plans, was the first pension accounting standard internationally to apply established conceptual framework (CF) principles. In Australia those principles have guided standard setting for more than a decade. However, AAS 25 has been criticized for failing to provide useful financial information. The analysis provided in this article addresses this paradox. The findings reveal major anomalies in AAS 25 associated with the treatment of accrued benefits that distort financial position and performance measures. The conceptual flaws in the standard are attributed to the misapplication of CF principles and an absence of adequate guidance in the CF for non‐corporate entities such as superannuation funds. Distorted financial information produced by superannuation plans has potential undesirable taxation and social outcomes. Consequently, there is an urgent need to update the Australian and international conceptual frameworks to provide guidance for revising accounting standards that better reflect current fiduciary and ownership relationships in non‐corporate entities such as superannuation funds.     

财务会计概念框架研究的比较与综评

本文在对目前主要的财务会计概念框架进行比较的基础上 ,着力阐述和综评了美国财务会计概念公告、国际会计准则委员会编报财务报表的框架、英国会计准则委员会的财务报告原则公告的各自优缺点。