管理者过度自信对企业跨行业并购的影响

管理者作为企业的最高决策层,是制定企业发展战略、实施投融资决策、进行企业日常经营活动以及执行企业日常经营管理的主体,其在决策过程中的过度自信心理对企业的发展至关重要.而跨行业并购交易作为公司市值管理的重要手段之一,研究管理者的过度自信与企业跨行业并购对公司价值最大化的影响十分重要.     

Integration or disintegration? Human resource implications of a common corporate language decision in a cross-border merger

The primary purpose of introducing a common corporate language in cross-border mergers is to integrate two previously separate organizations and facilitate communication. However, the present case study of a cross-border merger between two Nordic banks shows that the common corporate language decision may have disintegrating effects, particularly at organizational levels below top management. We identify such effects on performance appraisal, language training and management development, career paths, promotion and key personnel. Our findings show that top management needs to work through the consequences of the language decision upon those who are expected to make such a decision work.     

Do managerial behaviors trigger firm exit? The case of hyperactive bidders

This paper investigates the effects of managerial mergers- and acquisitions-related investment strategies on the exit risk of firms. Using a sample of hyperactive bidders, I show that managerial excessive acquisitiveness can precipitate firm exit. Overbidding is associated with weak corporate governance and lower disclosure quality within firms. I find that hyperactive bidders take more risk compared to conservative bidders. Such bidders also misallocate firms’ resources and dent firms’ reputational capital. Eventually, the external corporate control market is more effective compared to mechanisms such as bankruptcy reorganization, forced liquidation, leveraged buy-out, and expulsion from stock exchanges in disciplining hyperactive bidders by turning them into targets of takeover. These results suggest that a hyper acquisition-induced growth strategy is, on average, detrimental to the long-term survivability of firms and that the internal and external corporate-control mechanisms may not be effective enough to forestall falling value of an excessively acquisitive firm.     

Doing good or choosing well? Corporate reputation,CEO reputation,and corporate financial performance

Using data from Taiwan’s top 150 listed companies over the period 2003 to 2014, our study explores the influence of CEO reputation and corporate reputation on the financial performance of companies. The analysis focuses especially on the interaction between CEO reputation and corporate reputation to identify which dimension of reputation is more relevant to firm performance. We show that, though both corporate reputation and CEO reputation have an individual impact that benefits the financial performance of the company, the impact of CEO reputation is more persistent across different time periods and more comprehensive across different industries. Furthermore, we find that CEO reputation still has a positive impact on firm performance when corporate reputation is poor, indicating that CEO reputation is more important to firm performance. To pursue better financial performance, should a company make greater effort to build a good corporate reputation, or merely recruit a CEO with a good reputation? Our suggestion here is simple: “choosing well” is better than “doing good.”     

商业银行公司治理评价体系研究

对商业银行公司治理进行评价,有利于商业银行评估与有效防范风险。公司治理质量的高低是商业银行改制的关键,构建商业银行公司治理评价体系具有重要的现实意义。本文在分析商业银行公司治理的特殊性和商业银行公司治理存在问题的基础上,试图构建我国商业银行公司治理评价体系,以完善我国商业银行的公司治理。     

行业视阈下企业“并购或联盟”的选择偏好研究

企业并购和联盟的行为并不仅仅是特定的企业层面的问题,很多行业内都出现了大规模并购或联盟的风潮,这已成为了一种显著的行业性现象。在一个既定的行业中,大部分的企业都面临着相似的技术要求和市场态势。行业对于企业选择其外部成长战略的偏好有着重要的影响。在本文中,作者将提出三个行业层面的影响维度,通过两分法,将行业分为八种情景,分别讨论在不同行业情景下企业对兼并收购或战略联盟的选择偏好。     

基于COBIT的企业并购中信息系统整合风险分析

信息系统整合是企业并购中的重要内容,分析与控制企业并购中信息系统整合存在的风险是当今研究的一个新课题。COBIT体系目前已成为国际上公认的IT管理与控制标准,它可以指导企业有效地利用信息资源,有效地管理、控制与信息相关的风险。文章将信息系统整合活动映射到COBIT体系下,给出企业并购中信息系统整合风险模型,并利用该模型对企业并购中信息系统整合风险进行了识别与分析。     

CEO股票期权激励与并购决策关系研究——代理成本的中介作用和CEO过度自信的调节作用

运用美国上市银行1998—2014年的数据,将股票期权激励、代理成本、CEO过度自信与并购决策纳入统一的框架进行研究,以代理成本为中介变量,CEO过度自信为调节变量,以检验股票期权激励是否会影响并购决策,以及股票期权激励、代理成本、CEO过度自信与并购决策之间的关系。实证结果表明:CEO股票期权激励能够有效刺激其做出并购决策;代理成本对股票期权激励与并购决策的关系存在部分中介效应;CEO过度自信能显著调节股票期权激励与并购决策的关系;CEO过度自信对于股票期权激励与并购决策的关系的调节作用会通过代理成本起作用。     

超额现金如何影响企业研发投入——基于企业异质性和影响机制的实证研究

本文以2007—2018年中国制造业A股上市公司为样本,检验超额现金对企业研发投入的影响与机制。研究发现：(1)超额现金促进企业研发投入,使用工具变量和双重差分等多种方法缓解内生性问题后,该结果依然稳健;(2)异质性分析显示,该效应在融资约束高和公司治理好的企业中更明显;(3)关于影响机制的研究证实,CEO过度自信和失败容忍是超额现金影响企业研发投入的两个潜在机制。     

上市公司治理结构问题及其规范研究

本文认为上市公司治理结构失衡主要源于控股股东股权比率过大,股东大会股权结构不合理,董事会形成“内部人控制”,而监事会职责不清形同虚设。本文试图建立有效的上市公司治理结构,以规范上市公司的行为。     

Do Powerful CEOs Determine Microfinance Performance?

Recently, microfinance has been coming under public and media attacks. The microcredit crisis following from microfinance‐induced suicides in 2010 in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh indicates that weak corporate governance and imprudent risk taking have far‐reaching consequences. Yet, analyses of corporate governance mechanisms among microfinance institutions (MFIs) remain underdeveloped. As a response, this study examines the impact of CEO power on MFI risk taking by deriving explicit predictions of this effect from a characterization of the microfinance industry. Based on a sample of 280 microfinance institutions, our results suggest that powerful CEOs of microfinance non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) have more decision‐making freedom than powerful CEOs of other types of MFIs. This induces them to make more extreme decisions that increase risk. Furthermore, the decision‐making freedom powerful CEOs have in NGOs appears to lead to worse decisions, because the presence of powerful CEOs in microfinance NGOs is associated with lower performance.