新常态下我国银行业国际化区位选择影响因素研究

银行业国际投资区位选择往往受多种因素的影响,既有东道国的引力因素,也有本国的推力因素,更有银行自身素质和能力因素。本文在分析我国银行业国际化现状的基础上,对我国银行业国际化区位选择影响因素进行了定性分析与定量评价,明确商业银行国际投资区位选择的影响因素包括我国与东道国的双边贸易额、我国对东道国直接投资额、东道国人均GDP及其增长率、东道国金融开放度等。     

推动西安金融服务业发展的政策选择与体制保障研究

丝绸之路经济带的建设为西安金融服务业的发展有着不可小觑的促进作用。做好对金融服务业发展的政策选择和体制保障工作,推动西安金融服务业的发展,已经成为西部经济快速发展的必然要求。文章对西安金融服务业现有问题进行理论探讨,发现行业发展的政策实施及体制改革中存在的弊端,为进一步发展西安金融服务业的政策选择实施和体制措施提供参考。     

金融服务业集群演进问题研究国际动态

摘要：金融服务业集群的研究是现代金融服务业组织理论关注的重点之一。本文首先针对国际上关于金融服务业集群演进的相关概念进行文献综述;然后对金融服务业集群演进问题研究的理论脉络加以分类和整理,提出其集中研究的三大领域：集群形成的动因、集群的发展演进和集群演进的效应;最后对该领域近5年关于集群效应和金融危机对集群影响这两大研究领域进行评述,得出对金融服务业集群演进问题的启示和借鉴。     

数字普惠金融对服务业发展的影响及机制研究——基于省际面板数据的实证分析

数字普惠金融是近年来我国新兴的金融模式,其产生的经济社会影响备受关注,但关于数字普惠金融对产业经济发展影响的研究并不多见。本文利用省际面板数据,借鉴工具变量法和中介效应模型研究了数字普惠金融对我国服务业发展的影响与作用机制。结果表明:整体而言,数字普惠金融对我国服务业发展存在积极的影响,在行业和地区间存在异质性。其中,数字普惠金融对生产性服务业的影响程度高于生活性服务业,对中部地区服务业发展的影响大于东西部地区。进一步研究发现,数字普惠金融通过加快城镇化建设、提高居民消费水平以及促进要素市场发育来发挥促进服务业发展的作用。     

长三角三省一市金融业关联效应及波及效应对比

为了研究长三角地区金融业与其他产业之间的关联效应和波及效应,运用投入产出分析模型,对江浙沪皖四地的金融业与国民经济各产业部门之间的关联关系进行分析。结果显示四地金融业对服务业的依赖性均很强,随着第三产业的兴起,江浙沪提供的消费性金融产品或服务较多,上海市的金融服务业发展尤其突出,相反安徽省还停留在提供生产性金融服务阶段。因此,长三角各地应加大金融业对第三产业的渗透力,特别是安徽省要充分利用加入长三角的区位优势,加快发展本省金融服务业。     

我国信息服务业中小企业债务来源结构实证研究

本文以深圳中小板和创业板2010年上市的信息服务业中小企业为样本,收集了其上市前三年(2007~2009年)的财务数据,研究了信息服务业中小企业债务来源结构的特点及其影响因素。研究结果显示,我国信息服务业中小企业资产负债率较低,债务来源结构中经营负债率很高,金融负债率与存货占总资产比率、固定资产占总资产比率、资产规模正相关,而经营负债率与存货占总资产比率、固定资产占总资产比率、资产规模负相关,两者均与无形资产占总资产比率不相关。因此信息服务业中小企业在选择债务融资方式时应该适度进行金融负债融资,大力加强经营负债融资。     

有关我国建立离岸金融中心的建议

随着美国金融海啸对世界经济的影响日益严重,如何在我国稳妥建立"离岸金融中心"已经引起了我国政府和各级部门的高度重视,本文认为,建立我国离岸金融中心,区位选择并不是首要的问题,而上海最具可能性。离岸金融中心应逐步放开对"非居民"的限制,我国离岸金融业务的发展趋势是从离岸银行到离岸保险、离岸证券、离岸信托和离岸私人基金的投资。     

基于空间关联性的广深金融服务业集群研究——珠三角经济区域背景下的考察

自2000年以来,以广州、深圳为代表的珠三角各大城市先后出现了不同程度的金融服务业集群,本文利用区位熵、Moran＇s I等指数来考察该区域内各大城市之间的区域外溢性及存在的空间关联,以进一步揭示广州、深圳两大中心城市在金融服务业集群过程中基于空间自相关性的空间依赖和空间异质。结果表明：珠三角9大城市在集群过程中各自与周边地区的关联程度不一,存在着4种不同的情形,而广州、深圳的空间关联性则更多的体现为空间依赖上的异质性。     

中国金融出版社精品图书推荐

《金融支持现代服务业发展研究》作者:尹优平定价:46.00元本书以金融支持现代服务业的发展为研究对象,围绕如何有效发挥金融资源配置作用促进现代服务业发展这一主线,运用金融发展理论、服务经济理论等多学科理论,构建金融作用于现代     

山西现代服务业发展的金融支持策略

服务业是衡量现代社会经济发达程度的重要标志,加快其发展有利于推动产业结构优化升级、加快经济发展方式转变。本文从金融的内生、外生支持两个方面阐述了金融支持山西现代服务业发展的现状,在此基础上就金融支持现代服务业发展的策略选择提出了相关建议。     

The stages of financial services product elimination

This paper examines product elimination in the UK's financial services industry. The literature review establishes that physical goods elimination theory has only limited application to the financial services sector. Specifically, it fails to take account of constraints that prevent the removal of a product to a state of nonexistence. To overcome this, the sector uses two forms of removal — full and partial elimination. A three-stage methodology is used to find out how products are eliminated in retail banks, building societies and insurance organisations. A model is developed which explains that companies within the sector proceed through four stages during the elimination process — identification, decision, implementation and post elimination evaluation. At the end of this process, a product will have been either partially or fully eliminated. The preference of the industry is to use partial elimination. It can be concluded that the customer relationship is a key determinate factor in the choice of elimination process.     

手机银行差异化发展策略浅议

手机银行越来越成为改变金融业竞争格局的新型服务渠道。同时也是现代商业银行应对竞争的一种必然选择。随着我国金融业开放程度进一步扩大,中外银行在新业务领域的竞争将更加激烈。因此,银行业大力发展手机银行,应该迎接个性化、多元化、国际化等各个方面的挑战,走差异化路线。本文结合实际,提出了手机银行差异化发展的五个可行方向,试图提高手机银行业务对客户的吸引力。     

THE CHOICE BETWEEN CALLABLE AND NONCALLABLE BONDS

We examine the choice and the offer spreads between callable and noncallable bonds. We find significant differences by industry sector and therefore segment our results by financial and nonfinancial industries. For the financial sector, the popularity of callable and noncallable bonds is significantly related to the economic environment. Financial and high‐grade nonfinancial callable bonds are also more likely to be issued via a shelf prospectus. Although firms that issue callable bonds do not consistently display the characteristics associated with severe agency problems, the issue choice for below‐investment‐grade nonfinancial and lower rated financial bonds, where we can expect agency problems to be more severe, is more consistent with agency theory than is the issue choice for higher rated bonds.     

金融服务、外资政策调整与企业出口——基于中国微观数据的验证

基于金融服务是制造业的重要中间品投入,本文研究我国金融服务业外资政策动态变化对下游企业出口行为的影响。理论上,金融服务业外资准入放松有助于提升金融服务中间品的技术和管理水平,直接效果是有助于提升出口企业使用金融服务的多样化和便捷化,促进企业出口。本文采用国家发改委公布的《外商投资产业指导目录》,首次度量了我国金融服务业外资准入政策的动态变化,并使用投入产出表将其与我国制造业企业数据进行上下游关联,有效检验了金融服务业外资政策调整对下游制造业企业出口的作用。结果表明:金融服务业外资政策调整放开有助于提高下游制造业企业出口倾向和收益,存在出口促进作用;管理效率高、出口非技术密集型及资本密集型产品的企业出口对金融服务业外资政策调整的反应更为灵敏;金融服务业外资政策调整放开通过缓解企业融资约束促进企业出口。本文研究显示我国金融服务业外资政策调整放开是推动我国贸易提升的一个重要支撑点。     

Contemporary issues in banking

This article introduces the special issue which provides a timely and comprehensive overview of advances in banking research. First we highlight some of the major developments in banking since the global financial crisis noting the changed operational and regulatory environment, industry reform and the greater emphasis on risk measurement and management. We then go on to outline the contributions contained in the special issue all of which add to the debate on the implications of significant industry reforms in the banking and financial services sector.     

Financial inclusion,financial inclusion policy and Islamic finance

Using a qualitative analysis, the paper examines the links between financial inclusion and the Islamic financial services industry in Muslim countries. The findings show that, despite growth in the financial sector in many Muslim countries over the past few decades, many individuals and firms are still financially excluded. An analysis of the use of and access to financial services by adults and firms also shows that most Muslim countries lag behind other emerging economies in both respects, with a rate of financial inclusion of only 27%. Cost, distance, documentation, trust, and religious requirements are among the important obstacles. In addition, not surprisingly, the extent of Islamic microfinance is very limited, small by international standards; it accounts for a small proportion of microfinance, about 0.5% of global microfinance, and lacks a cost-efficient service model. This study suggests that Islamic instruments for redistributing income such as awqaf, qard-al-hassan, sadaqa, and zakah, can play a role in bringing more than 40 million people, who are financially excluded for religious reasons, into the formal financial system. The Islamic financial services industry has a long way to go in improving financial inclusion in many Muslim countries due to the scale needed and its relatively weak infrastructure.     

General insurance marketing: A review and future research agenda

The financial services sector is a huge and diverse industry comprising many different forms of organisations and product offerings. Yet, a review of past papers in the Journal of Financial Services Marketing (JFSM) reveals a heavy bias towards articles on banking, to the neglect of other equally important financial services categories. The purpose of this article is to address this imbalance and to call for more research to be conducted in a wider range of financial services categories. In particular, general insurance is singled out as a category worthy of further research. Looking to the past, this article reviews research published to-date on general insurance in the JFSM to establish a benchmark and explore theoretical contributions. Attention is then turned to the future to identify a research agenda for the general insurance sector going forward. Five important themes are identified: trust, transparency and simplification, technology, HNW, and Takaful.     

上海金融产业结构优化布局与调整

在金融业发展过程中逐步形成了不同层次的金融产业群,其基本结构是：核心金融产业——辅助金融产业——支撑金融产业。尽管上海已形成金融产业结构雏形,但表现出比较明显的核心金融产业超前发展、辅助金融产业和支撑金融产业相对落后的跛足状态。上海国际金融中心建设需要有一个完整、健全、稳固、协调、发达的金融产业结构布局,以金融产业发展规划为抓手进行金融产业结构优化调整是当务之急。     

Trust in financial services: Retrospect and prospect

Fostering and maintaining high levels of trust in the financial services sector is seen as crucial because of the characteristics of many financial service and in order to promote consumer engagement in the sector. In this article, we report evidence from a body of work and other commentary to provide an insight into trends in consumer trust in the sector as a whole, in comparison with other organisations and how different types of financial services provider have performed relative to each other. We show that the financial services sector as a whole is trusted more than some comparator institutions, and that aggregate levels of trust in the sector have fluctuated a relatively small amount subsequent to the financial crisis. However, important differences between provider types are apparent and these differences have become more profound in the recent past. We provide suggestions as to how trust in the sector may be improved and provider an analysis of current initiatives to improve trust levels in the sector in general and in banking in particular.     

Assessing the contribution of banks,insurance and other financial services to systemic risk

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the debate on systemic risk by assessing the extent to which distress within the main different financial sectors, namely, the banking, insurance and other financial services industries contribute to systemic risk. To this end, we rely on the $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{CoVaR}$ systemic risk measure introduced by Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011). In order to provide a formal ranking of the financial sectors with respect to their contribution to systemic risk, the original $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{CoVaR}$ approach is extended here to include the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test developed by Abadie (2002), based on bootstrapping. Our empirical results reveal that in the Eurozone, for the period ranging from 2004 to 2012, the other financial services sector contributes relatively the most to systemic risk at times of distress affecting this sector. In turn, the banking sector appears to contribute more to systemic risk than the insurance sector. By contrast, the insurance industry is the systemically riskiest financial sector in the United States for the same period, while the banking sector contributes the least to systemic risk in this area. Beyond this ranking, the three financial sectors of interest are found to contribute significantly to systemic risk, both in the Eurozone and in the United States.