现代企业中的企业社会责任价值

近年来,企业社会责任(CSR)成了一个热门话题。从企业社会责任的定义出发,论述了企业社会责任价值,提出了有利于实现企业社会责任的三种措施。     

推进企业社会责任的路径探析

企业社会责任运动(CSR运动)是20世纪二三十年代在西方发达国家掀起,八九十年代推进至全球。从"企业社会责任"问题和原因入手,分析和研究了提升企业社会责任的路径,探讨完善企业社会责任问题理论体系,以有助于企业建立企业社会责任。     

小微型民营企业社会责任践行模式研究

小微型民营企业的社会责任实践缺乏有效的理论和方法指导,学界和业界对此尚未给予应有的关注。本文基于小微型民营企业社会责任实践困境,依据战略管理和利益相关者理论,从企业管理视角提出了以确定对象、明确责任、制定战略、保障实施、评价成效为要素的小微型民营企业社会责任践行模式,以益于探索适合小微型民营企业特点的企业社会责任践行模式,促进小微型民营企业社会责任实践。     

Does doing “good” always translate into doing “well”? An eco‐efficiency perspective

Does doing “good” always translate into doing “well”? Debate over the “value” of corporate social responsibility is high on the agenda of corporate finance research. Deeper understanding is required on managers' incentives to pursue and implement corporate social responsibility related strategies, as is more thorough comprehension of the effect of these strategies to firms' performance levels as well as shareholder and wider stakeholder valuations of the firm. This paper provides a new lens by approaching the subject from a different methodological paradigm, grounded in the performance benchmarking methods more commonly applied in operational research. In so doing, we provide novel evidence of the effect of corporate choices on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategic investment compliance (i.e., doing good) to firms' eco‐efficiency levels (doing well). In brief, our empirical findings suggest that ESG and firm's eco‐performance are nonlinearly related. Specifically, advanced ESG policies and disclosure levels are associated with a positive affect to firms' eco‐efficiency levels, but only up to a point, after which the effect becomes “neutral,” that is, ESG demonstrates a visible pattern of diminishing marginal returns. Thus, we may humbly conclude that a firm may “do well” by doing good, but it is not clear they should ever expect to “do great” just by “doing good.” The threshold at which this “neutrality” appears varies systematically with the characteristics of the sector in which the firm is operating, as well as dimensions of board diversity. Finally, it is evident that ESG implementation choices can be a source of managerial agency problems.     

Relationships of Corporate Social Responsibility （CSR） With Accounting Information Systems A Study

The objectives of the present study are to put forth the concept of corporate social responsibility （CSR） in Turkey （Kayseri） and to examine research on this concept and the relationships between CSR and accounting information systems. Research data were gathered from 100 accounting managers who work in businesses with 250 or more employees in Kayseri. The dimensions of CSR were considered as business policies, environmental policies, market policies, and social policies, and the effects of these factors on accounting information systems were tested. Market policies and social policies dimensions of CSR had no significant impact on accounting information systems. Business policies and environmental policies dimensions of CSR had significant impacts on accounting information systems. Two basic conclusions were drawn from the current study： The business policy dimension of CSR had significant impacts on accounting information systems; the business policy and environmental policy dimensions of CSR together had significant impacts on accounting intbrmation systems.     

家族企业社会责任:研究述评与未来展望

在企业社会责任不断重构家族企业商业模式和可持续发展路径的背景下,家族企业的社会责任问题日益成为社会关注的热点。尽管过去十多年来学者们从多种理论视角对家族企业社会责任的前因和结果等议题展开了颇具成效的研究,但研究成果呈现出碎片化和模糊化的特征。基于此,首先区分了家族企业与非家族企业社会责任的不同内涵,明晰了家族企业社会责任的内涵与特征;其次,整合并评述了不同理论视角下家族企业社会责任的行为动因,并系统归纳了家族企业社会责任的影响效应,在此基础上构建了家族企业社会责任研究的逻辑框架;最后,对家族企业社会责任的未来研究方向进行了展望。     

市场环境、企业社会责任与基金安全投资转移

当市场环境不好以及不确定性增加时,基金进行安全投资转移。企业积极履行社会责任所形成的声誉资本具有\"类保险\"作用,在面临负面事件或不确定性环境冲击时能够防止股价大幅下跌和市值损失;基金是否会在市场环境不好时将投资组合转向社会责任绩效更高的股票进行安全投资转移呢?使用2010—2017年开放式基金样本,实证检验了企业社会责任、市场环境与安全投资转移之间的关系。研究发现,在市场环境表现不佳时,基金避险需求增加,倾向将投资组合更多地转向社会责任绩效高的股票进行安全投资转移;进一步研究发现基金和基金经理特征影响基金的安全投资转移行为,净资金流入较少、历史业绩差、经理选股能力差的基金根据企业社会责任进行安全投资转移的程度大。研究还发现,基金的安全投资转移行为对基金业绩和基金收益波动产生了积极影响。     

Which institutional investors drive corporate sustainability? A systematic literature review

In this article, we review recent archival research (66 studies) on the influence of institutional ownership (IO) heterogeneity on corporate sustainability. Relying on an agency-theoretical framework, we differentiate between various types of IO and their nature. We found that most prior research concentrates on the impact of IO heterogeneity on corporate sustainability performance. Long-term, sustainable, and foreign IO leads to better ESG/CSR outputs. Based on the business case argument for corporate sustainability, long-term institutional investors moderate the positive link between corporate sustainability and future financial performance. We provide useful recommendations for future research by focusing on endogeneity concerns as methodological challenges and content-related proposals for future research designs.