浙江粮食批发市场发展现状和对策建议

在市场经济条件下，粮食批发市场是有效配置粮食资源、实现粮食供求平衡的重要载体，本文通过对浙江粮食批发市场现状和存在问题的分析，提出进一步发展浙江粮食批发市场的对策建议。     

对《社会粮食供需平衡主要项目调查方案》的几点建议

根据国家粮食局的部署，省局确定从2002年度起组织开展社会粮食供需平衡主要项目调查。其调查范围首次从系统内转向社会，这是市场经济条件下，国家掌握全社会粮食供需状况、实施粮食宏观调控的需要．也是国有粮食企业深化改革、搞活经营的需要。在此．笔就实际调查中遇到的一些困难和问题，提出以下建议。     

我国乡镇粮食流通市场存在的问题与对策思考

乡镇粮食流通市场在我国粮食流通市场体系中处于重要的基础地位，关系到乡镇居民的民生，农业增产，农民增收与国家粮食安全保障等问题，本文以湖北省宣化店镇（以下简称宣化店镇）为例，对乡镇粮食流通体制市场化改革以后的市场体系构建，改革成效，存在的主要问题进行研究，并提出相应的对策建议.     

粮农增收与粮食问题

研究如何促进农民增收，不能回避占农民大多数的粮农增收问题。而要研究粮农增收，是不能回避粮食问题的。尤其是在粮食主产区，这两者更是密切相关。笔者从商品粮基地之一的高邮市为例，围绕粮农增收与粮食问题略反己见，以求教于各位领导和专家。     

白美清会长在华东六省一市粮经学会第十四次协作会议上的讲话

这次华东六省一市粮经学会协作会开得比较好，有代表性，因为华东六省一市是全国粮食工作的先进地区，许多工作走在全国的先列，而且有主产区，有主销区。这次开会的时机很好，是十六届三中全会以后学会召开的第一次会议，而且是在粮食工作处在一个重要的转折关头召开的会议。从这次会议情况来看，大家交流经验，沟通情况，展望未来，抓住了当前粮食行业的主要问题，符合粮食工作发展的趋势，提出了很多有见解、有建设性的意见与建议，对今后确保国家粮食安全是有好处的。     

关于财政支持粮食主产区粮食加工业发展的建议

粮食安全问题是我国政府十分关注和亟需解决的首要问题之一。河南作为全国粮食主产区重要省份之一。近年来在发展粮食生产、维护国家粮食安全方面不断思考、研究和探索，并进行了一些有益的尝试。本文结合河南省的情况，就国家进一步支持粮食主产区粮食加工业发展、促进农民增收、维护国家粮食安全等问题提出个人的一些建议，供参考。[编者按]     

中国粮食流通体制：宜管？宜导？宜放？

粮食问题是关系国计民生的问题。中国不同时期不同的粮食形势 ,导致了在粮食的流通体制问题上 ,先后出现了不同的改革政策和举措。归纳起来 ,可以概括为三种 :一是以“管”为取向的改革 ;二是以“导”为取向的改革 ;三是以“放”为取向的改革。三种改革取向的理论依据不同 ,在实践中运用的效果也各异。本文对这三种取向的改革进行了详细的分析研究 ,并结合当前粮食流通改革进程、国民经济发展的阶段性、粮食供求关系变化和市场建设现状的实际 ,提出了以“放”为主导的粮食流通体制改革的思路和建议。一、中国粮食形势的变化与粮食流通体制改…     

湖南湘西地区当前粮食生产工程研究

在湘西自治州农户全年粮食种植意向、截止2004年3月底农户春耕备耕情况、农户出售和储存粮食情况等调查基础上，对自治州全年粮食生产形势进行了预测分析，认为随着中央一系列保护播种面积政策的落实及农业科技的推进，其粮食产量有望增加。针对粮食生产面临的一些问题，提出把自治州粮食生产能力建设作为一项综合系统工程加以重视；依靠科学进步，加强科研项目的联合攻关，培育适合地方特点的新品种；因地制宜发展粮食生产，推进农业产业化经营，建立特色粮食产业，延长粮食产业链条；统筹粮食与其他农作物生产，协调粮食生产与农业结构调整的关系；增加农业投入，加强基本农田建设，推进中低产田改造工程，提高农田粮食生产能力；加强政策支持，切实保护农民种粮积极性。     

浅谈主产区与主销区建立稳定协调的粮食购销合作关系

《国务院关于进一步深化粮食流通体制改革的意见》指出：要放开销区，保护产区，为保证粮源的需要，主销区应采取多种措施与主产区建立稳定协调的粮食购销合作关系。主产区如何积极创新购销机制，扩大粮食销售，奠定粮食市场化经营的基础，是我省粮食购销企业予以重点研究的问题。     

我国粮食生产问题、潜力与对策

粮食问题是关系到社稷安危、国计民生的重大战略问题。本文简述了我国粮食生产存在的隐忧，分析了未来粮食生产可以挖掘的潜力，提出了发展粮食生产、保障我国粮食安全的几点建议。     

国土资源与可持续发展

今天 ,我向大家介绍一下我国国土资源的有关情况 ,并与大家一起学习中央关于国土资源管理的重要指示精神。我的介绍分为三个部分 :一是对国土资源重要地位和作用的认识 ;二是对国土资源面临严峻形势的分析 ;三是保护和合理利用国土资源的对策。一、国土资源的重要地位和作用自然资源包括土地资源、矿产资源、海洋资源、水资源、森林资源、草原资源、生物资源、气候资源、能源资源及自然景观旅游资源等十多种。社会生产离不开资源 ,无论生产创造的财富属于哪一个门类 ,其起始点都必定是自然资源。任何一个国家 ,其经济发展的规模、速度以及稳…     

国土资源科技进步与可持续发展

本文探讨了国土资源科技进步与可持续发展的关系 ,科技进步实现我国现阶段可持续发展的途径 ,对可持续发展的未来进行了展望 ,并提出了若干结论和建议。     

保障抗震救灾粮油质量安全的实践与体会

<正>"5·12"特大地震,给四川省粮食系统造成了重大人员伤亡和巨额经济损失,全省21个市州、148个县(市、区)、618个企业遭受了不同程度的破坏和损失,造成的直接和间接经济损失达到140亿     

江苏省地质环境管理改革发展的目标与路径

江苏省现阶段的主要地质环境问题是由自然因素和人为因素造成和引发的。多年来,江苏省地质环境管理取得了很大成绩,但也存在不少问题。新时期加强地质环境管理要根据江苏省的实际,不断深化认识,健全法制,明确责任,突出重点,拓宽地质环境管理思路;要从政府、企业和社会三方面着手,构建保障社会科学发展的地质环境管理新机制,全面推进地质环境管理改革,为江苏省现代化建设"两个率先"的宏伟目标服务。     

Similarities and dissimilarities between the EU agricultural and rural development model and Romanian agriculture. Challenges and perspectives

The main aims of this study are to highlight the differences and the similarities between the European model of agricultural and rural development, and the state of play in the Romanian agricultural sector. Statistically speaking, the agricultural sector's indicators of the past two decades place Romania outside the family picture of the EU countries, with very slight resemblances, and very strong discrepancies between their economic, technical, and institutional characteristics. At present, competition-wise, farming and farmers in Romania are still strongly disfavoured in relation to their competitors in the old EU Member States. In Romania, the economic and institutional mechanisms have most often been devised to the disadvantage of agricultural production, by claiming that subsistence farming would be the sustainable way, and by channelling the added value to other sectors. An option to continue the agricultural policies of the past decades and to abandon the national support lent to agriculture would be particularly risky through its unpredictable and incalculable social and economic effects.     

Land use planning and health and well-being

This paper is concerned with the relationship between the planning of settlements and health. It gives a brief introduction to the issues before summarising the evidence in relation to a range of topics, concluding with some more speculative thoughts on likely future findings.Modern planning was invented in response to inhumane living conditions in 19th century cities. But in the last century the connection was lost. Only now, with concerns over climate change and obesity, is there beginning to be the realisation that the physical environment is an important determinant of health.The paper uses a particular model of this relationship based on eco-system and health determinants theories to structure the review of evidence. The review covers: lifestyle choices in relation to physical activity and diet, mental well-being and community, the local economy and income, health inequalities and strategic land use transport planning, pollution and urban form, and finally impacts on global ecology.There is now a growing consensus that while personal factors are critical in determining health, the urban environment exacerbates or mitigates health and well-being outcomes.The level of active travel (walking and cycling) and outdoor recreational activity is strongly affected by accessibility to local facilities. Access to green, natural environments, and to local social networks, are factors in mental well-being. The wider sub-regional pattern of housing, economic development, land use and transport is a determinant of social exclusion and therefore health inequalities. It also affects health-damaging pollution, adaptability in the face of climate change and the level of carbon dioxide emissions.We have literally been building unhealthy conditions into many of our towns and cities. But comparisons with the best cities in Europe indicate that it is possible to reverse the less desirable trends. Success depends, however, on more radical policies of local authority control over land and finance than any political party has yet advocated. It also requires collaboration between the full range of powerful public and private organizations that influence the built environment.Future research is likely to further strengthen these conclusions. It will become much more obvious that planning for health and well-being is not only the NHS, but about creating a health-promoting physical, social and economic environment.