踏上创业板之路

高新技术,是现代市场竞争的关键性因素。高新技术从开发到产业化,需要经过多个阶段的"惊险跳跃"。如何唤起全社会每一个人、各个机构的创业精神和创业投资,对提高国民经济素质、实现经济结构调整、发挥民族经济优势,至关重要,因此,开设创业板市场,为高新技术的开发和产业化提供了一个具有实质性意义的市场性评价、流通和配置机制。与 A 股市场相比,创业板是一个与国际惯例接轨,充分贯彻市场规则的股市。开设创业板的目的,不仅在于支持一批成长型中小企业上市,更重要的还在于鼓励全社会的创业精神和创业投资,推动成长型中小企业的快速发展和产业化。目前,中国有1000多万家中小企业,哪怕只有万分之一(即1000家)能够成长为国际性大     

踏上创业板之路

高新技术,是现代市场竞争的关键性因素。高新技术从开发到产业化,需要经过多个阶段的"惊险跳跃"。如何唤起全社会每一个人、各个机构的创业精神和创业投资,对提高国民经济素质、实现经济结构调整、发挥民族经济优势,至关重要,因此,开设创业板市场,为高新技术的开发和产业化提供了一个具有实质性意义的市场性评价、流通和配置机制。与 A 股市场相比,创业板是一个与国际惯例接轨,充分贯彻市场规则的股市。开设创业板的目的,不仅在于支持一批成长型中小企业上市,更重要的还在于鼓励全社会的创业精神和创业投资,推动成长型中小企业的快速发展和产业化。目前,中国有1000多万家中小企业,哪怕只有万分之一(即1000家)能够成长为国际性大     

国内创业投资引导基金运作的思考

近几年，国内创业投资引导基金已取得了初步成效，发展迅速而且设立多样，为本土创业投资行业发展提供了契机，同时也为科技型中小企业解决融资问题提供了新的渠道。     

非银行金融机构与创业投资

世界经合组织科技委员会将创业投资定义为“一种向极具发展潜力的新建企业或中小企业提供股权资本的投资行为”。创业投资的对象主要是新创的高科技企业、现有的效益不高但发展潜力较大的企业 ,因而具有投资风险大、回报较高、周期较长、全方位参与、股权转让等特点。作为金融扶持中小企业创新发展的一种有效方式 ,创业投资正越来越受到各国的重视。一、非银行金融机构是创业投资的重要主体银行和非银行金融机构是金融部门的两大支柱。但是 ,银行部门参与创业投资的空间和潜力是很有限的。商业银行在经营管理中固然始终要与风险打交道 ,但“…     

论多层次资本市场的构建及其对我国创业投资发展的意义

中小企业融资难问题一直是制约企业发展的瓶颈,创业期企业由于高风险性而面临的融资困难更为严重。创业投资是支持创新及其产业化的融资机制,大力发展多层次资本市场是提高企业自主创新能力的基础和保障。多层次资本市场体系的构建,为中国创业投资业,以及中小企业点燃了一盏明灯。     

完善我国创业投资企业税收优惠政策的思考

创业投资是中小企业发展的助推器。但创业投资项目普遍具有失败概率高、投资周期长、年收益率波动性大等特点,因而各国普遍对创业投资企业适用税收优惠政策。本文分析了目前我国创业投资相关税收政策的不足,并提出了解决对策。     

经营资讯

<正>经营资讯之商务我国30亿中小企业创投基金年底成立中国中小企业协会发起设立、投资规模达30亿元的中国中小企业创业投资基金,在2008年年底前即可成立。同时,协会还拟组织发行"2008年中小企业集合债"。此外,酝酿筹建中国中小     

欧盟中小企业创业投资政府支持体系

增长潜力巨大的创新型中小企业是国家竞争优势的源泉.2005年1月1日起,欧盟委员会采用新的对中小企业的界定标准,此举反映了自1996年以来整体经济的发展,并更有效率地将需要扶助的中小企业纳入创业投资政府支持体系范围.欧盟委员会通过金融工程项目,推出中小企业创业投资政府支持体系,其着眼点是帮助中小企业获得与其发展阶段相适应的融资,推动社会-经济的健康、可持续发展.     

政府风险投资的功能定位和运作思路

风险投资是促进科技成果转化,培育高新技术企业,为国民经济增长提供重要源泉的生力军和催化剂.推动风险投资的发展已经成为许多国家促进中小企业技术创新和高新技术产业发展的战略选择.本文在回顾中国创业投资发展历程、分析创业投资发展特点的基础上,提出了利用政府资金参与风险投资的总体运作思路和可能的投资方式.     

对浦东创新企业融资模式的思考

"融资难"一直是制约科技型中小企业发展的瓶颈。上海浦东新区始终坚持创新驱动的发展思路,始终高度关注科技型中小企业的成长,重视完善科技投融资体系建设,通过科技与金融工作的结合促进区域融资环境的改善。探索出创新知识产权质押贷款模式、科技企业信用互助担保、设立创业投资引导基金等科技型企业投融资模式。浦东创新企业融资模式的借鉴作用和启示是政府充分发挥了引导作用,促进科技资源与金融资源的融合,不断完善和优化科技企业的融资环境,切实帮助解决科技型中小企业融资难题,促进科技企业的健康快速发展。     

对中小企业技术创新项目风险投资的博弈分析

在中小企业对技术创新项目进行融资的过程中,风险投资是其融资的一个重要途径,而风险投资人与风险企业之间会因利益的分配展开博弈。通过建立风险投资人与风险企业之间的博弈模型,可以看出风险企业对利润率高的技术创新项目进行风险融资的可行性并不高,所以风险投资人应谨慎选择风险企业进行投资,以降低资金风险。     

国有中小企业引进风险投资初探

风险投资在为企业发展和开发新技术提供资金方面有重要的作用。国有中小企业引进风险投资,可以为企业提供所需资金,使企业得到发展。国有中小企业应利用风险投资促进企业发展和技术创新。国有中小企业引进风险投资还存在着一些问题,国有中小企业引进风险投资较少。     

Risk management in Indian venture capital and private equity firms: A comparative study

Venture capitalists and private equity funds are often considered experts at investing in high‐risk projects and firms. To be successful investors, venture capitalists and private equity funds must therefore manage the many aspects of risk associated with investing in unlisted small and medium‐sized enterprises. This study examines how Indian venture capital and private equity firms manage several dimensions of risk. We analyze risk management preferences in Indian venture capital and private equity firms. A comparison between Indian and U.K. funds is presented. The results are discussed in detail. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

风险投资的内涵辨析及其实践意义

风险投资的内在运行机制是“合理预期高收益和合理控制高风险”。由此 ,风险投资的投资对象不是人们一般意义上所理解的“高成长的中小企业”、“高科技企业”或“风险企业” ;国内争论颇多的“创业投资”与“风险投资”并没有本质不同 ,此种译名之争 ,其实强调的是各自不同的侧面 ;为解决风险投资的退出机制 ,以过低的上市标准来设计、推出创业板是一个错误的选择。     

风险投资是新三板市场"积极的投资者"吗

定向增发在新三板创业企业的股权融资中发挥着中坚作用,而风险投资正是其中重要的参与者.本文选择2013 —2016年新三板企业定向增发为研究样本,实证检验了风险投资介入的动因及经济后果.研究发现,整体而言,风险投资参与新三板定向增发会选择财务绩效较好、创新能力较强的企业介入,结论支持了风险投资的事前筛选职能.大股东参与定向增发在一定程度上会减弱风险投资介入与企业财务绩效和创新能力之间的敏感性.当面对优质企业标的时,风险投资将选择联合投资的方式"抱团"进入,体现了其在新三板市场更为谨慎的投资风格.但风险投资进入所投企业后,受制于本身能力和投资意愿,并未显著提升被投企业财务绩效和创新能力,没有发挥事后监督职能.考虑新三板独特的做市商制度和分层制度,本文再次验证了风险投资事前筛选职能的履行和事后监督职能的缺失.本文不仅揭示了风险投资参与新三板企业定向增发的动因及经济后果,同时也为国家利用新三板市场推进创新战略、构建和完善多层次资本市场提供了经验证据.     

清洁技术产业风险投资的现状与对策

清洁技术产业已成为我国风险投资基金的热门投资领域,当前我国清洁技术产业风险投资呈现出投资增长迅速、覆盖行业全面、地域分布广泛和投资成效初显等特点,同时存在着风险投资认知度低、投资热点领域有待突破、政策风险大以及企业同质化发展等问题,如何解决这些问题成为制约清洁技术产业风险投资发展的关键。     

风险投资对创业企业作用的实证研究

文章从风险投资对创业企业作用的机理分析出发,实证研究风险投资对创业企业创生和企业成长的作用。对企业创生作用的研究表明风险投资活动的发展和增长有助于地区新企业的创生,一方面风险投资为那些无法从传统渠道融资的创业企业提供资金支持,另一方面也刺激地区创新,促使新经济部门、新技术、新产品的出现,为创业者创业活动提供更多机遇。有关风险投资对创业企业成长作用的研究采用倾向得分匹配法,该方法有效剔除了风险投资家“选择作用”对研究结果造成的偏差。研究结果表明风险投资不但有助于企业规模的不断扩大,同时也有助于企业研发创新等各项成长能力的提升,有效促进了企业竞争优势,帮助企业做大做强。     

论中小企业融资难的原因与对策

中小企业对我国的经济发展已起到越来越重要的作用,但在其进一步的发展过程中,却面临着融资难的困境。这其中既有外部的因素,也有中小企业自身的原因。我国中小企业走出融资困境的出路在于:收购上市公司,依法设立多层次的资本市场,推动证券市场的发展;完善相关法规建设,发展风险投资;深化金融体制改革,为中小企业提供贷款支持;鼓励民间融资。     

Publicly traded venture capital funds: implications for institutional “fund of funds” investors

Institutional investors supply the bulk of the funds which are used by venture capital investment firms in financing emerging growth companies. These investors typically place their funds in a number of venture capital firms, thus achieving diversification across a range of investment philosophy, geography, management, industry, investment life cycle stage and type of security. Essentially, each institutional investor manages a “fund of funds,” attempting through the principles of portfolio theory to reduce the risk of participating in the venture capital business while retaining the up-side potential which was the original source of attraction to the business. Because most venture capital investment firms are privately held limited partnerships, it is very difficult to measure risk adjusted rates of return on these funds on a continuous basis.In this paper, we use the set of twelve publicly traded venture capital firms as a proxy to develop insight regarding the risk reduction effect of investment in a portfolio of venture capital funds, i.e., a fund of funds. Measurements of weekly total returns for the shares of these funds are compared with similar returns on a set of comparably sized “maximum capital gain” mutual funds and the daily return of the S&P 500 Index. A comparison of returns on an individual fund basis, as well as a correlation of daily returns of these individual funds, were made. In order to adjust for any systematic bias resulting from the “thin market” characteristic of the securities of the firms being observed, the Scholes-Williams beta estimation technique was used to reduce the effects of nonsynchronous trading.The results indicate that superior returns are realized on such portfolios when compared with portfolios of growth-oriented mutual funds and with the S&P 500 Index. This is the case whether the portfolios are equally weighted (i.e., “naive”) or constructed to be mean-variant efficient, ex ante, according to the capital asset pricing model. When compared individually, more of the venture funds dominated the S&P Market Index than did the mutual funds and by much larger margins. When combined in portfolios, the venture capital funds demonstrated very low beta coefficients and very low covariance of returns among portfolio components when compared with portfolios of mutual funds. To aid in interpreting these results, we analyzed the discounts and premia from net asset value on the funds involved and compared them to Thompson's findings regarding the contribution of such differences to abnormal returns. We found that observed excess returns greatly exceed the level which would be explained by these differences.The implications of these results for the practitioner are significant. They essentially tell us that, while investment in individual venture capital deals is considered to have high risk relative to potential return, combinations of deals (i.e., venture capital portfolios) were shown to produce superior risk adjusted returns in the market place. Further, these results show that further combining these portfolios into larger portfolios (i.e., “funds of funds”) provides even greater excess returns over the market index, thus plausibly explaining the “fund of funds” approach to venture capital investment taken by many institutional investors.While the funds studied are relatively small and are either small business investment companies or business development companies, they serve as a useful proxy for the organized venture capital industry, despite the fact that the bulk of the funds in the industry are institutionally funded, private, closely held limited partnerships which do not trade continuously in an open market. These results demonstrate to investors the magnitude of the differences in risk adjusted total return between publicly traded venture capital funds and growth oriented mutual funds on an individual fund basis. They also demonstrate to investors the power of the “fund of funds” approach to institutional involvement in the venture capital business. Because such an approach produces better risk adjusted investment results for the institutional investor, it seems to justify a greater flow of capital into the business from more risk averse institutional investment sources. This may mean greater access to institutional funds for those seeking to form new venture capital funds. For entrepreneurs seeking venture capital funds for their young companies, it may also mean a lower potential cost of capital for the financing of business venturing. From the viewpoint of public policy makers interested in facilitating the funding of business venturing, it may provide insight regarding regulatory issues surrounding taxation and the barriers and incentives which affect venture capital investment.     

科技型中小企业立体式融资模式创新研究

根据科技型中小企业的实际情况,构建科技型中小企业立体式融资模式。研究表明:由于高风险、信息不对称、融资渠道单一、缺乏融资对接渠道、可抵质押资产少等原因,融资难一直是制约科技型中小企业发展的瓶颈。立体式融资模式,能够较为全面地解决科技型中小企业在不同发展阶段所面临的资金需求难题。