INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF COMMON STOCKS IN RELATION TO INSIDER OWNERSHIP

In this paper, the authors empirically examine whether corporations with high degrees of insider ownership enjoy superior returns compared with firms with more diffuse ownership. In addition, the authors evaluate the effects of insider ownership on security returns in relations to the well-known effects of size and earnings yield (or price-earnings) ratios. Results indicate that, in addition to Basu's price-earnings effect, insider ownership is a new statistically significant variable that is associated with abnormal returns. This return anomaly might occur because the market pays an inadequate price for top managements' equity ownership, a firm-specific fundamental variable that has a theoretical foundation in agency theory.     

市场有效理论及我国股票市场有效性的实证检验

我国股票市场近年来出现的一系列事件引发了人们的深刻思考,而传统的资本市场理论已无法圆满地解释我国股票市场现有的发展程度、发展阶段及有效性等问题.为此,本文提出了市场有效性理论.利用该理论,作者通过抽样统计,对我国股票市场的有效性进行了实证分析.本文的重点在于研究我国股票市场的发展层次即其有效性层次.首先通过随机游程和股价自回归检验方法得出了我国股票市场处于弱型有效的结论,然后针对目前关于有效性层次方面的争论,用事件研究法阐述了如下观点:我国股票市场目前正处于弱型有效市场层次,但并不具有半强型有效市场的特点.     

THE IMPACT OF BOND RATING CHANGES ON COMMON STOCKS AND BONDS: TESTS OF THE WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION HYPOTHESIS

Past studies on the impact of bond rating changes have focused on bonds or stocks and the information content of rating change announcements. This paper examines both bonds and stocks and investigates the wealth redistribution effect as well as the existence of information content. The results imply that information content of “bad’ news dominates firm downgradings, while the wealth redistribution effect dominates firm upgradings. Furthermore, this study attributes the lack of information content for bond upgradings to the offsetting effects of wealth redistribution and information content.     

MARKET REACTION TO NYSE LISTINGS: TESTS OF THE MARKETABILITY GAINS HYPOTHESIS

This study examines the market reaction to listing on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The marketability gains hypothesis states that investors expect liquidity gains for the less liquid over-the-counter (OTC) stocks but not for their liquid counterparts after their listing on the NYSE. The hypothesis is supported even after accounting for other firm-specific news releases. Stocks with low liquidity on the OTC exhibit a positive reaction, whereas stocks with high liquidity show a non-positive market reaction around the announcement of the listing application. The findings imply that the two different marketplaces, NYSE and OTC, are suitable for stocks with different liquidity characteristics.     

A TEST OF THE RISK PREMIUM HYPOTHESIS

Contrary to economic theory, there is international evidence that common stock returns and inflation are negatively related. This negative relationship is examined in this paper and the applicability of the risk premium hypothesis is tested. According to this hypothesis, an increase in unanticipated inflation causes the market risk premium to rise, which in turn lowers current stock prices. A model is developed and the effect of uncertain inflation on the market risk premium across four countries is tested empirically. Results indicate that the market risk premium is positively related to uncertain inflation.     

DAY OF THE WEEK EFFECTS: A TEST OF THE INFORMATION TIMING HYPOTHESIS

Many explanations have been offered for the negative Monday effect. An obvious conjecture is that the negative return might be due to firms timing the release of information after the market closes on Friday. We test this conjecture on a sample of 233 firms for 1986. Using a firm's board meeting date as a proxy for high information days we find that a firm's Monday return near a board meeting date is more likely to be negative than other Monday returns. Also the remaining days of the week tend to be more positive than similar days further away from the board meeting. Our results appear to explain part of the negative Monday effect.