整体历史原真性保护与城市历史地段更新——以成都宽窄巷子改造为例

在城市历史地段的保护与更新中,城市历史地段的历史价值和文化价值日益得到社会的重视.随着商业开发的加剧势必带来更为严峻的历史遗产保护的问题,商业开发、城市更新与建筑遗产和历史风貌保护间的矛盾也更加尖锐.本文试图以成都宽窄巷子的改造为例,探讨整体历史原真性保护的观念在城市历史地段更新中的价值与运用.     

历史文化名镇保护、建设、旅游规划"三位一体"编制模式的探讨——以碛口为例

随着我国历史文化名镇、名村的陆续评定与公布,名镇名村的遗产保护、旅游开发、村镇建设规划的纺制工作日益引起重视.本文结合亲身体验,探讨了由一个团队承担同一个历史文化名镇保护规划、旅游发展规划、城镇建设规划编制任务的"三位一体"模式,认为这样做起码有三大优越性:可以统筹兼顾,最大限度地使用相关资料与规划成果.同时讲座了"三位一体"模式对规划对象及规划编制单位的要求.     

对城市历史文化保护的一些认识

我国在城市历史文化保护方面经历了四个发展阶段,即普遍植树绿化、文物个体保护、历史文化名城与历史文化地段的保护。尤其是后两个阶段是重要的认识飞跃。自1982年国务院批准并颁布了第一批历史文化名城起,保护的方法与认识由文物管理部门独家保护与管理孤立的文保方式,发展到对具有特殊历史意义的城市进行全城整体性的保护,以规划、文管、城建等部门为主,全城市各单位共同参予,由点及面地纳入统一的规划,不仅保护了文物古迹本身,而且保护了其周围的环境,并通过立法获得法定地位。这是对城市历史文化遗产保护的第一次认识升华,现在,经过近十年的实践,提出历史文化地段的保护,是对城市历史文化遗     

城市历史地段保护策略研究--以南京明故宫地段为例

探讨了中外对历史地段及其保护的界定,以及当前保护历史地段的客观意义,进而从历史文化遗产保护与城市规划相结合的角度提出历史地段保护与发展规划的原则,并以南京明故宫历史地段为例进行分析,确立南京明故宫历史地段保护的定位,划定其历史文化保护区的范围,最终提出保护规划的若干策略.     

规划视角下的老工业地段保护更新路径探讨——以广西柳州空压机厂为例

中国特色社会主义进入新时代,遗产保护成为实现中华民族伟大复兴的重要抓手。作为特殊的遗产类型,老工业地段是历史文脉的重要构成和新时代城市转型的特色资源。近年来,单体工业遗产的保护利用取得了一定成效,但是以规划视角对老工业地段保护更新及其与文明传承、城市转型、生态修复耦合关系的研究极其少见,导致大量特色鲜明的老工业地段在更新时仅保留了个别建筑,整体价值大打折扣。以柳州空压机厂为例,从新时代文化复兴和城市转型的要求入手,以规划的视角,构建了涵盖保护体系、用地转换、棕地治理三大系统的保护更新方法路径。最后对我国老工业地段保护更新提出了优化建议。     

历史城镇的文化商业旅游发展模式

通过探讨历史城镇保护与开发的关系,对中国历史城镇发展中几种典型的错误商业形态进行了总结,并指出适宜的旅游商业化开发对历史城镇发展的必要性。提出历史城镇的文化商业发展模式:在其地域文化的基础上,发掘传统文化的内涵,并与多种商业形式结合进行综合开发。     

碎片式历史地段与城市整体发展耦合机制研究

从文化资源的新视角与城市整体的宽视域重新审视碎片式历史地段与城市发展间的相互关系。在历史地段资源综合价值评估的基础上,通过建构两者之间关联性耦合模型,探索其在社会、经济、文化、空间等不同层面的多元耦合路径,以实现历史地段的转型再生,形成针对碎片式历史地段与城市整体耦合发展的遗产保护理论,指导旧城更新与遗产保护实践。     

郪江古镇旅游开发浅析

郪江古镇有着悠久的历史与文化,但是长久以来,旅游发展一直缓慢.不管是经济发展,还是文化保护,都没有得到足够的重视.借着灾后重建,当地政府也愿意积极的重新审视郪江古镇的历史文化和旅游价值.古镇的开发主要面临两个问题:开发与保护,这是目前中国很多古镇普遍存在的问题.古镇要开发旅游业,必然会涉及到一些基础设施的修建,有的地方会破坏古镇的建筑以满足旅游规划.但是这样必然会给古镇的文化和历史气息造成破坏,如果保持原貌又阻碍旅游业的进一步扩大发展.古镇开发与保护看似是一个矛盾,但是这又是一个在开发古镇旅游时不得不面对的问题.     

阆中"山水城一体化"战略与古城历史文化资源开发

阆中古城已逾千年历史,保存了丰富的民俗、 风水、 三国、 科举文化和美丽的山水风光,被评为"中国历史文化名城"、"四川十大古镇".阆中旅游十三五规划以"山水城一体化"为重点.结合阆中古城的区位条件、 开发现状,对接"山水城一体"战略,可以从古城建设、 提升游客观光体验质量两个方面进行历史文化资源的保护和开发.     

对传统音乐进行旅游开发的宏观思考

为发挥传统音乐遗产资源的特殊优势,在有效保护的基础上,须合理利用传统音乐代表性项目进行旅游开发,推动文化旅游产业发展。应该尽快出台《非物质文化遗产法实施细则》,研商制订《传统音乐旅游开发管理办法》。在开发理念方面,应该明确宣示传统音乐旅游开发的保护型理念,强调传统音乐的旅游开发是对传统音乐资源的保护型开发、保护型利用、保护型旅游;在管理体制方面,应由文化主管部门与旅游主管部门共同决策,授权公共性事业组织"传统音乐旅游开发中心"统一实施;在经营模式方面,立足权属明确,保留公益性经营模式,倡行企业化经营模式,探索上市公司经营模式。     

发展文化产业要重视文化内涵

随着我国经济社会的发展,经济与文化的联系也越来越紧密。我们要紧抓历史机遇,树立大文化意识,深入挖掘和继承传统文化的精髓,创建更加优秀的现代文化,强化文化产业理念,做强文化产业,在大力发展文化产业的基础上实现文化产业与经济社会的协调发展。     

桂北地区乡土文化资源与乡村旅游经济互动发展研究

由于国内社会经济的飞速发展,人民群众的生活水平越来越高,使得近年来出行旅游的人越来越多,这在很大程度上促进了旅游业的发展。特别是国内各地乡村旅游业的快速发展,大大推动了乡村经济的繁荣,促进了乡村现代化发展。论文以桂北地区乡土文化资源为研究对象,认为在发展乡村旅游经济的同时,更要重视乡土文化资源的保护与传承,从而有效实现乡村旅游经济的可持续发展,促进乡村旅游业以及社会经济的健康发展。     

中国旅游电子商务开发探讨

电子商务与旅游业的结合--旅游电子商务其发展已呈势不可挡之势,必将给旅游业带来革命性变化,并从根本上改变旅游业发展的传统模式。加强旅游电子商务的研究,对加快我国旅游业与国际市场接轨的步伐,实现中国由″亚洲旅游大国″向″世界旅游强国″的战略性转变具有重要的理论指导意义。文章重点从旅游网站的分类、旅游电子商务开发中存在的主要制约因素及开发策略等方面作了一些初步的探讨。     

旅游企业电子商务环境分析及对策

文章从旅游企业电子商务环境的优劣势入手,探讨中小旅游企业如何利用自身的优势制定企业发展的规划与战略,寻求长远的发展。     

我国电力系统规划发展战略和安全运行

随着全球经济的不断发展,电网大规模互联成为电力系统发展的必然趋势,电力工业是国民经济的重要部门,其发展应当与国家的经济建设相协调。因为电力工业投资规模巨大,所以合理地进行电力系统规划可以获得很大的经济效益和社会效益。电力网络已经发展成为世界上最复杂的人造网络之一。引导好电力系统的规划工作,才能避免风险,构建电力系统的可持续发展机制,本文对电力系统的规划进行了研究分析。     

历史街区的有机更新与活力复兴研究——以青海同仁民主上街历史街区保护规划为例

论文针对我国在历史街区保护与改造中存在的问题,采取定性分析与实证研究相结合的方法,以青海同仁历史文化名城民主上街历史街区保护规划为例,探寻在城市现代化建设中如何保护、利用城市历史街区,并使之成为促进城市活力积极因素的方法.并从历史文化遗产保护理论、历史街区有机更新与活力复兴的内涵与原则,保护规划的具体方法三个方面提出了同仁民主上街历史街区的规划建设思路.总结出在规划建设中要运用有机更新的思想方法,保护街区的人文社会网络,传承与发展地域环境特色,才能达到活力复兴与可持续发展目标的结论.     

城市中心历史街区多维度保护模式构建

历史街区是一个城市地方性文化集中展现的区域,随着经济的发展,城市建设与历史街区保护之间的矛盾日趋尖锐,历史街区保护是城市发展过程中需要解决的重要问题。文章在对城市中心历史街区现实状况分析的基础上,指出城市中心历史街区在土地利用、传统商业发展、地方性文化保护、街区保护和修缮方面存在的问题。依据文化遗产保护的真实性和完整性原则,提出了历史街区空间维度、时间维度、文化维度(TSC)"三维一体"的多维保护模式。以昆明市文明街历史街区为研究实例,将历史街区多维度的保护模式与文明街历史街区的保护实践相融合,探索文明街历史街区整体、活态保护的新思路和新方式。     

Government planning, with and without the cooperation of industry

Conclusions In the last section it was argued that the government should regularly prepare a medium-term plan of the development of the whole economy. This plan should, in its outward aspect, bear considerable resemblance to the National Plan: it should be both comprehensive and detailed. Such a plan would serve as a framework for coordinating all government policy decisions having a medium-term impact — that is not only public expenditure, investment (and pricing) in the nationalised industries, but also taxation and transfer payments. This would meet four criticisms of the present planning procedures: firstly, that the formal procedures for assessing tax and transfer policies are virtually confined to the short-term issues, so that the longer-term implications tend to be neglected; secondly, that public expenditure decisions are taken in the context of arbitrary and unrealistic assumptions about future tax rates; thirdly, that micro-economic considerations are considered only in a partial equilibrium framework; fourthly, that the forecasting activities of the nationalised industries and other public bodies are insufficiently coordinated.This would be planning by the government, for the government, an extension of present procedures. The final plan would embody public sector decisions and incorporate forecasts of private sector behaviour. The private sector would not however be directly involved.It was further argued that as a general rule, these plans (which would at the same time be forecasts) should be published. The information contained is not only necessary for public participation in policy choice, but useful for decision-making in the private sector. Moreover, since information is a collective good, there is a strong case for extending this forecasting service somewhat beyond those items justified solely by their importance in public sector decision-making.If this type of planning is adopted, then, apart from the impact of these published forecasts, influence on the private sector is confined to traditional controls, mostly fiscal and monetary. In Section II we considered the possibility of involving the private sector more directly in the planning process, as indeed was done in drawing up the ill-fated National Plan. We found the role of a cooperative medium-term plan (drawn up by government and industry in partnership) to be distinctly limited.Firstly, among those decisions which are relevant to the focus year, only those that are just about to be taken are of strategic importance, and these are small in number; the tâtonnement process should be confined to these decisions — this at least represents a considerable simplification. There are, besides these, two groups of decision: Those aleady taken (these should be even smaller in number and relatively simple to ascertain) and those not to be taken for some time. As far as this last group is concerned, and the bulk of decisions will be in this group, there is little to be gained from an approach to decision-makers; plans do not exist and forecasts may be obtained from experts whose advice is at once informed and disinterested. Such forecasts may be expected to be conditional on the decisions evolved in the tâtonnement process; thus provision must be made for the mutual interaction of decisions and forecasts.Secondly, there is the problem, to which we have frequently referred, of conflicting objectives. Can those enterprises which are to be involved in the tâtonnement process be persuaded to pursue the national interest or at least to obey some minimal rules of the game? It is important in this context to notice that the firms involved will be ones with long gestation lags, and these will be, almost exclusively, large corporations. It is precisely these firms that may most easily be persuaded to pursue the national interest.The character of such firms should also be borne in mind in considering the impact of planning on competition. The kind of competition characteristic of large firms operating in oligopolistic industries is certainly very different from competition in more fragmented industries. It manifests itself not in prices (as of course traditional theory assumes) but in escalating sales campaigns, which might well be condemned as wasteful or worse, and product differentiation. Some might think this kind of competition not worth preserving. But those who think this might well go one step further and suggest that such enterprises should be nationalised on the grounds that it is only thus that the full advantages of cooperation can be secured.It would seem indeed that cooperative planning is an uneasy half-way house, a curiously British compromise (strange that it should have originated in France!). Such a compromise might have been valuable in as far as cooperative planning did not generate the same emotional hostility as nationalisation. Indeed the planning movement united both the major parties. But whatever advantages cooperative planning may once have had in this respect have been dissipated by the mishandling of the National Plan. It would, however, be much more tragic if this unfortunate episode were to inhibit the development of the kind of mechanism for government planning discussed in the second half of this paper.     

古城商都今越秀——广州市越秀区旅游环境整体美的规划

为发展广州名城核心城区商贸旅游 ,需创建旅游环境整体性的美。本文从资源框架结构、开发内容、理念手法方面 ,提出了拓展更多容纳游人的旅游空间、开发新的历史遗迹旅游景点、探索串连景点景区的设计手段等若干建设性的意见