铁肩担道义 科技促粮兴

<正>粮食是稳民心、安天下的产业。从近些年我国粮食行业发展的实践来看,科技发挥的作用不断加大,取得了粮食储藏成套新技术新工艺集成创新、小麦呕吐毒素生物降解技术等一大批具有世界先进水平的重大成果。我们正在科技兴粮的路上加速前行,但整体上我国粮食科技的发展水平与实现     

综合·资讯

“十二五”以来粮食科技创新资金投入超50亿 11月16—17日，全国粮食科技创新大会在北京召开，从会上获悉，近年来我国粮食科技创新顶层设计不断优化，粮食科技发展环境持续向好，粮食科技投入明显提升，科技创新成果丰硕。“十二五”以来，中央财政粮食科技项目支持超8亿元，带动各类创新资金投入超50亿元。国家粮食局局长任正晓指出，粮食科技工作既要“上天”，把保障和支撑国家粮食安全作为“天大的责任”和“天高的使命”：又要“落地”，科学研究要紧密结合国情、粮情，技术创新要紧贴行业需求、公众需要，突出解决最急需、最关键的科技难题。     

中国粮食储备企业科技创新发展现状、问题及策略

粮食储备在国民经济发展中占有重要的战略地位，在保障中国粮食安全中发挥着重要作用，科技创新是引领支撑粮食行业健康发展的重要引擎。粮食储备企业作为粮食储藏的基本单元，科技创新能力将直接影响粮食仓储行业高质量发展。文章全面系统地介绍了粮食仓储行业科技创新发展的现状及前沿，指出了当前发展面临的重大机遇，深入剖析了制约科技创新的瓶颈问题，针对性地提出了符合行业发展的策略建议，旨在为促进中国粮食储备企业转型升级、科技创新能力提升提供参考和依据。     

河南省粮食局:粮食科技创新助力产业经济发展

正河南省粮食局积极落实创新驱动发展战略,实施"科技兴粮"和"人才兴粮",加强对粮食科技工作的指导和科技规划实施相关工作的沟通协调,督促各类粮食科技创新主体认真落实主要任务,细化目标。针对粮食产业发展面临的重大和关键科技问题,加速推进科技成果转化,形成了一批卓有成效的科技成果,有效助推粮食产业发展。提高思想认识,加强粮食科技创新工作全省各级粮食行政部门高度重视推动粮食科技进步的重要性和紧     

国家粮食局发文 加快推进粮食行业科技创新人才发展

正日前,国家粮食局发布意见指出要坚定不移地走科技兴粮、人才兴粮之路,加快推进粮食行业科技创新人才发展。意见指出,要全面落实创新驱动发展和人才优先发展战略,大力实施科技兴粮和人才兴粮工程,在粮食行业科技创新人才发展体制机制的关键环节取得突破性进展,实现科技创新人才数量快速增加、素质大幅提升、结构较为合理、使用效能显著提高、竞争优势明显增强,建成一支适应粮食行业创新驱动发展需要的科技创新人     

以科技创新转变粮食产业化经营发展方式

一、以加快科学发展为支撑，促进科技创新整体推进目前，粮食产业化经营已经进入转方式、调结构、促升级的关键战略机遇期，只有转变发展方式才能促进粮食产业化经营可持续发展。一是把握科技创新内涵，二是增强科技创新能力，三是构建科技创新机制，四是完善科技创新结构。     

加强农业科技创新 持续推进藏粮于技

藏粮于技是新时期保障国家粮食安全的重要战略举措,藏粮于技的核心是科技,要以科技为支撑走内涵式的粮食发展道路。我国粮食生产在育种技术、耕作栽培技术、收储加工技术等方面均存在短板,要通过创新农业生物技术、农业信息技术、农业工业技术,完善科研创新体系、科技服务体系让藏粮于技落到实处,同时要从科技创新主体、创新要素、创新环境等各方面加强藏粮于技的政策保障,为藏粮于技营造良好的生态环境。     

山东省粮食局:加快科技创新 推进强业兴粮

正山东省各级粮食部门切实加强组织领导,坚持多措并举,积极实施"科技兴粮"战略,加快科技创新步伐,科技兴粮工作成效显著。加强政策引导,优化发展环境近年来,山东省各级粮食部门认真贯彻落实党中央、国务院《关于深化体制机制改革加快实施创新驱动发展战略的若干意见》和《关于深化科技体制改革加快创新体系建设的意见》,加大粮食科技创新力度,进一步提高了企业竞争力,推动了粮食产业持续健康发展。各地高度重视粮食     

湖南省粮食局:坚持创新引领 加快行业发展

正创新是五大发展理念的首要核心要义,是粮食行业转型升级、提质增效的根本之策。近年来,湖南省粮食局始终牢记习近平总书记关于"藏粮于技"战略的重要指示,坚持把科技创新摆在行业发展中最突出、最重要的位置,不断加快湖南省由粮食生产大省向粮食经济强省转变。一、始终以科技创新为强大动力,塑造行业发展新动能企业是科技创新的主体,是"科技兴粮"的主要阵地。对此湖南省粮食局积极引导和鼓励粮食企业开     

“三农”

<正>国办:发文推进发展粮食产业经济。国办日前印发《关于加快推进农业供给侧结构性改革大力发展粮食产业经济的意见》,明确了大力发展粮食产业经济的重点任务:培育壮大粮食产业主体,增强粮食企业发展活力;创新粮食产业发展方式,促进全产业链发展;加快粮食产业转型升级,增加绿色优质粮油产品供给;强化粮食科技创新和人才支撑,加快推动粮食科技创新突破;夯实粮食产业发展基础,建设粮食产后服务体系。     

国土资源与可持续发展

今天 ,我向大家介绍一下我国国土资源的有关情况 ,并与大家一起学习中央关于国土资源管理的重要指示精神。我的介绍分为三个部分 :一是对国土资源重要地位和作用的认识 ;二是对国土资源面临严峻形势的分析 ;三是保护和合理利用国土资源的对策。一、国土资源的重要地位和作用自然资源包括土地资源、矿产资源、海洋资源、水资源、森林资源、草原资源、生物资源、气候资源、能源资源及自然景观旅游资源等十多种。社会生产离不开资源 ,无论生产创造的财富属于哪一个门类 ,其起始点都必定是自然资源。任何一个国家 ,其经济发展的规模、速度以及稳…     

国土资源科技进步与可持续发展

本文探讨了国土资源科技进步与可持续发展的关系 ,科技进步实现我国现阶段可持续发展的途径 ,对可持续发展的未来进行了展望 ,并提出了若干结论和建议。     

保障抗震救灾粮油质量安全的实践与体会

<正>"5·12"特大地震,给四川省粮食系统造成了重大人员伤亡和巨额经济损失,全省21个市州、148个县(市、区)、618个企业遭受了不同程度的破坏和损失,造成的直接和间接经济损失达到140亿     

江苏省地质环境管理改革发展的目标与路径

江苏省现阶段的主要地质环境问题是由自然因素和人为因素造成和引发的。多年来,江苏省地质环境管理取得了很大成绩,但也存在不少问题。新时期加强地质环境管理要根据江苏省的实际,不断深化认识,健全法制,明确责任,突出重点,拓宽地质环境管理思路;要从政府、企业和社会三方面着手,构建保障社会科学发展的地质环境管理新机制,全面推进地质环境管理改革,为江苏省现代化建设"两个率先"的宏伟目标服务。     

Similarities and dissimilarities between the EU agricultural and rural development model and Romanian agriculture. Challenges and perspectives

The main aims of this study are to highlight the differences and the similarities between the European model of agricultural and rural development, and the state of play in the Romanian agricultural sector. Statistically speaking, the agricultural sector's indicators of the past two decades place Romania outside the family picture of the EU countries, with very slight resemblances, and very strong discrepancies between their economic, technical, and institutional characteristics. At present, competition-wise, farming and farmers in Romania are still strongly disfavoured in relation to their competitors in the old EU Member States. In Romania, the economic and institutional mechanisms have most often been devised to the disadvantage of agricultural production, by claiming that subsistence farming would be the sustainable way, and by channelling the added value to other sectors. An option to continue the agricultural policies of the past decades and to abandon the national support lent to agriculture would be particularly risky through its unpredictable and incalculable social and economic effects.     

Land use planning and health and well-being

This paper is concerned with the relationship between the planning of settlements and health. It gives a brief introduction to the issues before summarising the evidence in relation to a range of topics, concluding with some more speculative thoughts on likely future findings.Modern planning was invented in response to inhumane living conditions in 19th century cities. But in the last century the connection was lost. Only now, with concerns over climate change and obesity, is there beginning to be the realisation that the physical environment is an important determinant of health.The paper uses a particular model of this relationship based on eco-system and health determinants theories to structure the review of evidence. The review covers: lifestyle choices in relation to physical activity and diet, mental well-being and community, the local economy and income, health inequalities and strategic land use transport planning, pollution and urban form, and finally impacts on global ecology.There is now a growing consensus that while personal factors are critical in determining health, the urban environment exacerbates or mitigates health and well-being outcomes.The level of active travel (walking and cycling) and outdoor recreational activity is strongly affected by accessibility to local facilities. Access to green, natural environments, and to local social networks, are factors in mental well-being. The wider sub-regional pattern of housing, economic development, land use and transport is a determinant of social exclusion and therefore health inequalities. It also affects health-damaging pollution, adaptability in the face of climate change and the level of carbon dioxide emissions.We have literally been building unhealthy conditions into many of our towns and cities. But comparisons with the best cities in Europe indicate that it is possible to reverse the less desirable trends. Success depends, however, on more radical policies of local authority control over land and finance than any political party has yet advocated. It also requires collaboration between the full range of powerful public and private organizations that influence the built environment.Future research is likely to further strengthen these conclusions. It will become much more obvious that planning for health and well-being is not only the NHS, but about creating a health-promoting physical, social and economic environment.