共查询到8条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
用收益法评估企业的整体资产,越来越多地被运用于高科技企业及高成长、高收益性的企业.采用收益法评估企业整体资产,是以评估基准日为起点,分析企业的营业收入(或销售收入)、成本费用,并考虑固定资产折旧、无形递延资产摊销、资本性支出等因素,计算出企业在特定收益期限内(无限年或有限年)总现金流入量及总现金流出量,从而计算企业的净现金流量并折现加总,即得出企业的整体资产(净资产)价值.出于对未来收益不确定性、高科技企业的高经营风险或合资(合作)年限等因素的考虑,我们在采用收益法评估企业整体资产时,有时会采用收益期为有限年的现金流模型来计算企业的整体资产. 相似文献
2.
企业并购中商誉价值评估是一项比较复杂而困难的工作.一般采用割差法和超额收益法,在使用这两种方法时会遇到很多问题,包括资产负债评估不全面、不客观,超额收益和折现率的测算不可信等.本文通过分析得出,评估企业商誉时选用割差法更好些,超额收益法可以作为割差法的良好补充. 相似文献
3.
Abstract: This paper presents a tractable structural model whereby controlling equity holders are also among the creditors of the firm. As the firm approaches distress, equity holders can drain the assets of the firm and expropriate other creditors by repaying their credit before bankruptcy. The right of the bankruptcy court to revoke such repayment protects arm's length creditors, reduces the cost of borrowing and induces equity holders to anticipate repayment of their credit. Equity holders decide repayment neither too early nor too late, so as to reduce the risk of repayment revocation by the bankruptcy court. Similar conclusions apply to the preferential repayment of bank loans personally guaranteed by equity holders. The analysis also suggests that callable bearer bonds may be more valuable to equity holders than to other creditors. 相似文献
4.
新经济时代,智力资本及其绩效越来越受到广泛关注。从智力资本增值的概念、计量出发,建立绩效和智力资本增值的实证模型,对深交所A股上市公司按行业和板块分类进行实证研究,发现智力资本对不同类型企业多重绩效均产生影响。 相似文献
5.
知识产权质押融资模式为科技型中小企业提供了一种新的融资方式,能够有效地缓解科技型企业有形担保资产少、融资难的矛盾.现有学者对于科技型中小企业知识产权质押融资的研究主要包括知识产权质押融资的模式研究、知识产权质押融资的风险分析、知识产权质押融资的价值评估这三个方面,基于此,本文主要围绕这三个方面对相关文献进行梳理和总结,以期对未来的研究提供平台支持. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
Decline of Controlled Foreign Company Rules and Rise of Intellectual Property Boxes: How the European Court of Justice Affects Tax Competition and Economic Distortions in Europe 下载免费PDF全文
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has become an influential player in the field of direct taxation in the European Union (EU) in the past 20 years. However, it is unclear whether or not the ECJ's decisions and the corresponding reactions by the member states actually contribute to tax neutrality in economic terms and, therefore, to the achievement of the internal market. In 2006, the ECJ limited the applicability of specific tax rules in the EU that are intended to prohibit the excessive use of low‐tax countries by multinationals. Our counterfactual analysis shows that the court's restriction of so‐called controlled foreign company rules and the related second‐round reactions by some member states – i.e. the introduction of low‐tax regimes for income from acquired intellectual properties (IP boxes for acquired IP) – cast doubt on the seemingly positive effects the ECJ has on reducing tax distortions. In addition, we demonstrate that the restricted applicability of IP boxes as endorsed by the OECD and the European Commission would strengthen tax neutrality in Europe. 相似文献