共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Vincent Buskens 《Games and Economic Behavior》2003,42(2):235-252
This paper provides theoretical background for some effects of social networks on trust. We study the implications of a model with rational actors in two settings with three actors. In the first setting, there are two trustees who are involved in transactions with one truster implying that the truster has an exit option. In the second setting, two trusters play with one trustee, which gives the trusters options for voice, i.e., complaining and informing each other about the trustee's behavior. We compare these models with a baseline model in which there is only one truster and one trustee. It turns out that the opportunities for placing and honoring trust do not change for the exit model compared to the baseline model. The opportunities for trust in the voice model differ from the baseline model only if both trusters inform each other at a rate that is high enough. Only if the possibilities for receiving information and transmitting information are large enough for both trusters, trust will increase due to the information exchange possibilities in the voice model. 相似文献
2.
In this paper, we examine the problems facing a policy maker who observes inconsistent choices made by agents who are boundedly rational. We contrast a model-less and a model-based approach to welfare economics. We make the case for the model-based approach and examine its advantages as well as some problematic issues associated with it. 相似文献
3.
Alvaro Sandroni 《Games and Economic Behavior》2000,32(2):509
Two long-lived players play a repeated coordination game. I show the restrictions on players' beliefs which imply that cooperation is optimal play. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: D83. 相似文献
4.
Miguel A. Costa-Gomes 《Journal of Economic Theory》2002,104(1):104-136
M. Rabin (1994, J. Econ. Theory63, 370-391) proposes a model of behavior in two-person complete-information games with preplay communication, using non-equilibrium notions in the spirit of rationalizability to derive lower bounds on players' expected payoffs when players have unlimited communication opportunities. This paper adapts Rabin's model so that it can be used to analyze the results of the experiments of R. Cooper et al. (1989, Rand J. Econ.20, 568-587) on structured preplay communication in the Battle of the Sexes and the results of the unstructured bargaining experiments of Roth, Malouf, and Murnighan. Adding empirically motivated restrictions that allow the model to predict the payoff effects of changes in bounded communication possibilities like those in the experiments, it is shown that the data from both experiments are generally consistent with Rabin's model, and with the predictions of the extended model. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C70, C72, C78, C91. 相似文献
5.
Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
We did experiments in a three-round bargaining game where the (perfect) equilibrium offer was $1.25 and an equal split was $2.50. The average offer was $2.11. Patterns of information search (measured with a computerized information display) show limited lookahead rather than backward induction. Equilibrium theories which adjust for social utilities (reflecting inequality-aversion or reciprocity) cannot explain the results because they predict subjects will make equilibrium offers to “robot” players, but offers to robots are only a little lower. When trained subjects (who quickly learned to do backward induction) bargained with untrained subjects, offers ended up halfway between equilibrium and $2.11. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C7, C9. 相似文献
6.
Walras and Darwin: an odd couple? 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Reinoud Joosten 《Journal of Evolutionary Economics》2006,16(5):561-573
General equilibrium theory and the evolutionary branches of economics and game theory take rather opposite positions in the spectrum covered by the economic science. However, we reveal and explore analogies between Darwinian dynamics and Walrasian tatonnement processes for pure exchange economies, as well as further analogies implied by these. 相似文献
7.
社区主导型乡村旅游发展的博弈论——从个人理性到集体理性 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
我国社区主导型乡村旅游发展尚处于初级阶段,却已经显现出旅游市场的无序竞争和公共资源过度利用及破坏等公地悲剧问题。文章运用博弈论方法分析,认为这些问题是村民与村民之间以及村民与游客之间基于个人理性的相互博弈的结果。从长期来看,集体理性更符合村民长期利益最大化的心理需求,社区村民的博弈具有从个人理性向集体理性转变的机制和驱动力。为了避免和缓解公地悲剧的发生,缩短从个人理性到集体理性转变的时间距离,必须依赖于外部力量的引导以及合理的制度安排,文章提出了相应制度保障措施。 相似文献
8.
Results derived from empirical analyses on the stability of climate coalitions are usually very sensitive to the large uncertainties
associated with the benefits and costs of climate policies. This paper provides the methodology of Stability Likelihood (SL)
that links uncertainties about benefits and costs of climate change to the stability of coalitions. We show that the concept
of SL improves upon the robustness and interpretation of stability analyses. Moreover, our numerical application qualifies
conclusions from a recent strand of literature based on stylised models with ex-ante symmetric players that learning has a
negative impact on the success of coalition formation in context of uncertainty.
相似文献
9.
Don Ross 《Journal of Economic Methodology》2014,21(4):411-427
That the rationality of individual people is ‘bounded’ – that is, finite in scope and representational reach, and constrained by the opportunity cost of time – cannot reasonably be controversial as an empirical matter. In this context, the paper addresses the question as to why, if economics is an empirical science, economists introduce bounds on the rationality of agents in their models only grudgingly and partially. The answer defended in the paper is that most economists are interested primarily in markets and only secondarily in the dynamics of individual decisions – specifically, they are interested in these dynamics mainly insofar as they might systematically influence the most useful approaches to modeling interesting markets. In market contexts, bounds on rationality are typically generated by institutional and informational properties specific to the market in question, which arise and are sustained by structural dynamics that do not originate in or reduce to individuals' decisions or psychological dispositions. To be sure, these influences interact with psychological dispositions, so economists have reason to attend to the psychology of valuation. But no general model of bounded rationality should ever be expected to feature in the economist's toolkit, regardless of the extent to which psychologists successfully identify specific human cognitive limitations. Use of moderate rational expectations assumptions should be understood in this light. Such assumptions are readily relaxed in specific applications, and in ways customized to modeling circumstances, that modelers, experimentalists, and econometricians are making steadily more sophisticated. 相似文献
10.
Oishi Hidetsugu 《Economic Theory》2007,31(3):587-596
This study provides a new framework and a new equilibrium concept, which are able to describe the situation where people have
various images of the society and have various solution concepts for social outcomes, and where people accept the social outcomes.
In socially subjective equilibrium, people have a coherence of their own norms in two senses. One is the consistency of the norm itself. Imagined outcomes should
satisfy a certain (subjective) solution concept. The other is the consistency between the imagined outcomes and realized one.
These are the main features of our equilibrium concept.
This paper forms a part of my doctoral thesis, which is titled “On socially subjective equilibrium”. The first person I would
like to thank is my direct supervisor Professor Ken Urai (Osaka University). I obtained a basic idea of the main concept of
my doctoral thesis, that is, the solution concept scheme, from Professor Urai. I am grateful to Professor Hiroaki Nagatani
(Osaka University) and Professor Ken-Ichi Shimomura (Kobe University), who monitored my works and took efforts in providing
me with valuable comments on earlier versions of my thesis. I also obtained a fruitful advice from Professor Kenichi Amaya
(Kobe University). Lastly, I specially thank to Kozo Shiraishi (Osaka University). 相似文献
11.
This paper analyzes the dynamic interaction between two regions with interconnected river basins. Precipitation is higher in one river-basin while water productivity is higher in the other. Water transfer increases productivity in the recipient basin, but may cause environmental damage in the donor basin. The recipient faces a trade-off between paying the price of the water transfer, or investing in alternative water supplies to achieve a higher usable water capacity. We analyze the design of this transfer using a dynamic modeling approach, which relies on non-cooperative game theory, and compare solutions with different information structures (Nash open-loop, Nash feedback, and Stackelberg) with the social optimum. We first assume that the equilibrium between supply and demand determines the optimal transfer price and amount. We show that, contrary to the static case, in a realistic dynamic setting in which the recipient uses a feedback information structure the social optimum will not emerge as the equilibrium solution. We then study different leadership situations in the water market and observe that the transfer amount decreases toward a long-run value lower than the transfer under perfect competition, which in turn lays below the social optimum. In consequence, the water in the donor's river-basin river converges to a better quality in the presence of market power. Finally, we numerically compare our results to the Tagus-Segura water transfer described in Ballestero (2004). Welfare gains are compared for the different scenarios. We show that in all dynamic settings, the long-run transfer amount is lower than in Ballestero's static model. Further, we show that the long-run price settles at a lower level than in Ballestero's model, but is still higher than the average cost-based price determined by the Spanish government. 相似文献
12.
Debt as a collusive device in an oligopoly supergame 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Dick Damania 《Journal of Economics》1997,66(3):249-269
This paper explores the impact of debt holdings on the output decisions of firms in an oligopoly supergame with stochastic demand fluctuations. It is demonstrated that when perfect collusion is not feasible then there exist circumstances in which increased debt holdings may facilitate tacit collusion. This occurs because higher debt levels act as a credible commitment device which lowers the payoffs accruing to a firm when it defects from the tacitly collusive equilibrium. It is further shown that in these circumstances firms may have an incentive to hold debt for strategic purposes which promote collusion. 相似文献
13.
14.
企业的生产经营活动对人们赖以生存的环境产生着重大影响,所以企业应承担向社会公众披露有关环境信息的责任。目前,企业的环境信息披露情况不容乐观.为了促使经济健康发展.本文通过建立模型来分析企业与相关入之间的博弈关系,试图达到一种经济学上的“帕累托最优”状态。 相似文献
15.
16.
We propose an elementary game form that allows to obtain the allocations proposed by any acceptable bankruptcy rule as the unique payoff vector of the corresponding Nash equilibria. 相似文献
17.
William J. Zahka 《The Journal of economic education》2013,44(4):395-401
Because Nobel Prize economics lectures are written for various purposes and cover a range of topics at different levels of difficulty, the author uses them to add rigor and relevancy to an economics course. 相似文献
18.
Recent contributions show that climate agreements with broad participation can be implemented as weakly renegotiation-proof
equilibria in simple models of greenhouse gas abatement where each country has a binary choice between cooperating (i.e.,
abate emissions) or defecting (no abatement). Here we show that this result carries over to a model where countries have a
continuum of emission choices. Indeed, a Pareto-efficient climate agreement can always be implemented as a weakly renegotiation-proof
equilibrium, for a sufficiently high discount factor. This means that one need not trade-off a “narrow but deep” treaty with
a “broad but shallow” treaty. 相似文献
19.
20.
标准委托-代理激励模型及分析框架沿袭新古典经济学中关于理性经济人、偏好不变、预期效用等基本假定,存在一些无法解释的现象和悖论。本文从行为经济学对主流经济学的新古典经济学基本假设的挑战出发,对标准委托-代理激励模型及分析框架中代理人完全理性和风险规避等基本假设所带来的缺陷进行了系统分析,探究了如何利用期望理论的价值函数替代期望效用函数、有限理性替代完全理性来构建新的委托一代理激励模型及分析框架。新模型和框架考虑了代理人的心理特征和非理性行为,将增强激励模型及分析框架对现实制度的解释力和适用性。 相似文献