CRITICAL COMMENTARY: A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS MADE REGARDING “CHANGED RULES THEORY AND THE EVOLUTION OF ACCOUNTANCY”

Birkin @9pet al@2p. (1997) applied new arguments about the evolution of life on this planet to the evolution of accountancy and derived prospects from these new arguments. The arguments were based on discoveries made in the Burgess Shale as reported and explicated by Gould (1991). In particular, the Birkin @9pet al@2p. (1997) paper indicated that the use made of Social Darwinism within accountancy was incorrect according to these new arguments about evolution. The comments made regarding this paper claimed that Social Darwinism and the new arguments about evolution were not incompatible, that several errors of attribution were made and that the Birkin @9pet al@2p. (1997) paper failed to show that Darwin's theory of natural selection was incorrect. This response reveals how those comments were based on a misreading of the Birkin @9pet al@2p. (1997) paper and a misinterpretation of the fossil evidence of the Burgess Shale.     

THE LOGIC OF EARNED ECONOMIC INCOME—A REPLY

Skinner (1998) challenged the papers that had presented the theory of Earned Economic Income (EEI) and had developed it in an attempt to show how it could be applied in practice. He asserted that they were illogical, inconsistent and based on a flawed chain of reasoning. This paper contends that Skinner's arguments were probably based on confusion. Such confusion could be attributable to a misinterpretation of adequate exposition by the proponents of EEI, because of Skinner's apparent fixation on a valuation-based concept of income measurement. Alternatively, it could be an indication of inadequacies in such exposition. Due to the possibility of the latter, this response seeks very briefly to clarify some of the concepts that Skinner disputes, indicating the reasons for dismissing his contentions. It is possible that Skinner dislikes EEI because it is inconsistent with a model for which he has a prior preference, but that would not be an appropriate basis for dismissing reasoned argument.     

A CRITIQUE ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING: TOWARDS A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF CLASSIFICATION—THE SEARCH FOR OWNERSHIP

This paper is a critique on contemporary accounting¹classification studies. It suggests that such studies have thus far provided an inadequate assessment of and explanation for extant international contemporary accounting diversity. This paper locates the discussion within a neo Marxian political economy, and explores how notions of structure and hierarchy central to the institutional traditions of economic liberalism and the social priorities of capital have increasingly invaded the classification and understanding of contemporary accounting diversity. It contends that such classification studies are a product of capitalist desires to import and assimilate increasingly distant realms of business life into the capital@8alabour value relation/contemporary accounting@8icapital relation. Furthermore, this paper suggests that such classification studies fail to recognise the impact of such social, political and economic arrangements as they are increasingly reupholstered and redistributed by the changing priorities of capital, resulting in a limited appreciation of the constitutive power of capital and its influence on contemporary accounting.     

AUDITORS’ RECOGNITION AND DISCLOSURE MATERIALITY THRESHOLDS: THEIR MAGNITUDE AND THE EFFECTS OF INDUSTRY

Materiality thresholds are the dividing line between material and immaterial information. Recognition materiality thresholds are the dividing line between what is recorded and what is not recorded in the accounts. Disclosure materiality thresholds are the dividing line between what is separately disclosed in the financial statements and what is not separately disclosed. Auditors materiality thresholds are important because they have a significant influence on what information is recorded in the accounts and disclosed in financial statements and hence available for decision making by external parties. However, there are no research findings about recognition thresholds, and those in relation to disclosure thresholds show a lack of consensus. Hence the motivation for this research. The objective of the research is to study auditors’ recognition and disclosure thresholds within the context of industry, which is divided into the industry of the firm and the industry specialization (experience) of the auditor. The results of the study show that: (1) Recognition thresholds are significantly lower than disclosure thresholds. (2) The mean thresholds are 5·7% (recognition) and 8·7% (disclosure). These are in the 5% to 10% guideline provided by Australian accounting standards. (3) The thresholds appear to vary with industry market risk. (4) Auditors appear to use the thresholds from the industry in which they specialize, in an industry in which they do not specialize. The paper discusses the implications of these findings.     

CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING: A COMMENTARY ON BRYER'S “A MARXIST CRITIQUE OF THE FASB'S CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK”1

Bryer (1999) reiterates criticisms of the “balance-sheet” approach underlying the FASB's conceptual framework as failing either to explain or guide the development of financial accounting practice, and aims to demonstrate how operational and objective principles of financial accounting can be derived from Marx's labour theory of “surplus-value”. However, the potentially conflicting objectives of “Marxist” accountings remain unresolved, and Bryer's attempted derivation of accounting rules for individual business enterprises appears to misunderstand the rationale of Marx's detailed examination of the circuits of capital in Parts One and Two of Volume II of @9pCapital@2p and to offer no critical foundation for Praxis. It is argued here that the focus of a critical Marxist accounting would more appropriately shift to recognising the extraction of surplus-value from labour and its addition to the value of inventory during the process of production (rather than reporting profit as the result of sale). However, the practical application of such a principle would still require the use of convention-based allocations at least as arbitrary as those of conventional financial accounting and, more fundamentally, such a change of accounting principle could not in itself be sufficient to “force the secret of profit making” under the capitalist mode of production. The accounting would still be consistent with both Marxist and neoclassical economic theories of the nature of capitalism. Bryer's approach to deriving Marxist accounting rules cannot help us to understand the problematic nature of the power of modern financial accounting.     

EARNINGS NEWS AND MARKET RISK: IS THE MAGNITUDE OF THE POSTEARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT DRIFT UNDERESTIMATED?

Postearnings announcement drift is the tendency for cumulative abnormal returns to drift in the direction of earnings surprise after the earnings news is released. I show that a standard approach to measuring abnormal returns by using preannouncement estimates of market risk (betas) causes the magnitude of this phenomenon to be significantly underestimated. I find that stock beta tends to rise (fall) following the release of bad (good) earnings news. In addition, I find that by not taking into account postannouncement shifts in betas, prior studies are likely to have underestimated the magnitude of the drift. My results are robust to different model specifications, as well as to different earnings surprise measures.     

THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ANALYSTS’ FORECAST REVISIONS AND EARNINGS COMPONENTS: THE EVIDENCE OF FRS 3

This study examines whether the earnings components as required by FRS 3 help UK analysts to predict firms’ earnings changes by investigating the statistical association between analysts’ forecast revisions and firms’ unexpected earnings components. I find that analysts’ forecast revisions made in different time horizons are consistently associated with unexpected earnings components as required by FRS 3. UK analysts are able to incorporate current-year unexpected earnings components into their current and future earnings forecasts even before firms officially release this information. However, empirical results also show that current-year unexpected earnings components are not fully incorporated into analysts’ forecasts of future earnings. Analysts appear to wait for more information releases regarding firms’ future earnings and delay their revisions of future earnings forecasts. This is consistent with the evidence that the cumulative revisions of current earnings forecasts are generally associated with prior-year unexpected earnings components, and the association appears to be stronger as time progresses. Overall, this study provides evidence suggesting that the earnings components as required by FRS 3 help UK analysts to identify firms’ permanent and transitory earnings changes over different forecast horizons. This study also provides strong evidence supporting the informativeness of earnings components for analysts’ forecasts and the information set perspective of FRS 3 that highlights the importance of earnings components in predicting a reporting entity’s future performance.     

ARE WATCH PROCEDURES A CRITICAL INFORMATIONAL EVENT IN THE CREDIT RATINGS PROCESS? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

The Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) model (Boot model) predicts certain credit rating events are likely to be more informative than others and that credit watch procedures are an important driver of such differences. We test the core empirical predictions of their model. Our sample comprises U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings provided by Moody's, 1990–2006. Our findings fail to uncover compelling evidence for the empirical predictions of the Boot model in relation to the role of watch procedures as coordinating mechanisms. Rather, our findings are more supportive of the view that rating agencies are always at an informational advantage relative to investors.     

WHAT'S IN A NAME? A CAUTIONARY TALE OF PROFITABILITY ANOMALIES AND LIMITS TO ARBITRAGE

The recent literature investigating profitability anomalies defines profitability in various ways (i.e., gross, operating, and cash based). We show that limits to arbitrage are associated with returns of gross and cash-based operating profitability anomalies, suggesting mispricing. In contrast, returns from the operating profitability strategy have no relation with barriers to arbitrage and exhibit no evidence of mispricing. Additionally, we show that the differential effects of limited arbitrage-related mispricing of gross and cash-based operating profitability anomalies are attributable to their respective correlations with selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expense and accruals anomalies. We find that SG&A return predictability, like that of accruals, is related to limits to arbitrage. These findings suggest that investors and researchers should proceed with caution when searching for return predictability by redefining profitability measures.     

AUDITOR CONCENTRATION AND MARKET SHARES IN THE US: 1988–1999 A DESCRIPTIVE NOTE

This paper examines from a historical perspective the effects of the Big Eight and Big Six accounting firm mergers on concentration measures and market share percentages of major accounting firms in the US large company audit market. Concentration ratios and Herfindahl indices reflect an increasingly concentrated audit market, though individual firms differ in their success at capturing market shares in the three exchanges examined, as well as in their ability to capture newly listed companies or companies switching auditors over the 1988 to 1999 period.     

“GETTING BY” AND “GETTING ON” IN SERVICE WORK: LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE OF ACCOUNTING?

The use of educated labour which can multi-task, make decisions and act responsibly facilitates the real subsumption of labour. By presenting data from an ethnographic study of students working in unskilled service jobs in the UK, we show that such workers are not subsumed totally but exhibit a resistant medium by extending their own frontiers of control and developing self-help policies. As many accounting students will have worked in the kinds of jobs reflected in our study, these experiences have important implications for the future of accounting in the USA and elsewhere where work within and outside the profession has been deskilled and educated labour is increasingly used to undertake lower skilled work     

THE CHINESE NATIONAL WHO SURFS THE SEA OF FINANCE IN ASIA——The Cover Personage incarnates the elegant Chinese national as the first Ranking Vice President of the ADB,famous economist and Financier active in the international financial arena

Lin Zexu,a patriot,thinker and national hero,who served as Governor for Hu Guang and Governor for Liang Guang and in other positions in Qing Dynasty,composed a couplet for self-motivation."Vast is the sea which embraces flows from millions of rivers;and upright is the precipice which rises single-mindedly to the zenith."He encouraged himself by this couplet to be magnanimous,receptive,and upright and to be a man of unbending principle.This is a motto which Jin Liqun has followed the first day he took office in Asian Development Bank (ADB),to guide his work and the way he conducts himself in this community.He practices in accordance with this principle as he carries out the mandate of this multilateral financial institution.Jin Liqun has won the accolade that he is