新闻记者应如何兑现社会责任与职业良心

新闻记者的社会格局决定着社会参与度,反映着社会责任心.社会格局根植于党性人民性,心怀格局方能兑现双重使命.胸怀全局、心系人民且具备政治鉴赏和专业水准,时刻践实社会责任和职业良心,是新闻记者的基本素养.     

对我国建立医疗职业责任强制保险的思考

随着近年来医疗纠纷的上升,医疗职业责任保险已成为当今中国的一个热点问题。本文分析了我国现行医疗职业责任保险的问题,针对我国的基本国情及医疗职业责任保险的现状,提出应当建立医疗责任强制保险制度并分析了其优势,相信会对我国医疗职业责任强制保险的发展从而缓解医疗纠纷、维护医疗秩序起到积极作用。     

关于企业社会责任问题的经济学思考

在经济全球化背景下推行企业社会责任运动是一种必然的发展趋势。企业社会责任运动直接敦促企业家关注企业的社会责任，并实现公平而体面的工作条件，对我国企业的成长有促进作用，本文围绕企业社会责任这一问题．着重探讨了现阶段应如何正确认识企业社会责任运动，指出成熟的市民社会是公司和企业能够践行社会责任的不可或缺的条件。     

手机电视喧嚣背后的冷思考

手机电视是指利用移动终端为用户提供视频节目定制和消费服务的一种新兴交互传播媒介。“手机电视”大致可分为两种方式，一种是通信方式，利用移动通信技术、通过无线通信网（如3G、GPIKS、CDMA等）向手机点对点提供多媒体服务；另一种是广播方式，利用数字广播电视技术、通过地面或卫星广播电视覆盖网向手机、PDA、MP3、MP4、数码相机、笔记本电脑以及在车船上的小型接收终端点对面提供广播电视节目。     

关于企业社会责任问题的经济学思考

在经济全球化背景下推行企业社会责任运动是一种必然的发展趋势.企业社会责任运动直接敦促企业家关注企业的社会责任,并实现公平而体面的工作条件,对我国企业的成长有促进作用.本文围绕企业社会责任这一问题,着重探讨了现阶段应如何正确认识企业社会责任运动,指出成熟的市民社会是公司和企业能够践行社会责任的不可或缺的条件.     

关于企业社会责任问题的经济学思考

在经济全球化背景下推行企业社会责任运动是一种必然的发展趋势。企业社会责任运动直接敦促企业家关注企业的社会责任,并实现公平而体面的工作条件,对我国企业的成长有促进作用。本文围绕企业社会责任这一问题,着重探讨了现阶段应如何正确认识企业社会责任运动,指出成熟的市民社会是公司和企业能够践行社会责任的不可或缺的条件。     

中国海外企业的社会责任与和谐世界——2007年初热点新闻时间巧合中有关必然性的冷思考

新闻事件回放2007年1月25日,一家中资石油公司在尼日利亚南部遭不明身份武装人员袭击,9名中方员工失踪,同一天,广州市工商局公布了对广州市场流通环节休闲服装的专项质量监测结果,包括Etam、SNOOPY、VEROMODA等多个国际知名品牌的服装被检出含有《国家纺织产品基本安全技术规范》明确禁用的致癌芳香胺。     

中国企业的社会责任战略思考

企业社会责任是企业可持续发展的基石.我国企业社会责任意识已基本形成,但大多数企业尚未建立健全社会责任管理体制.文章在分析我国企业社会责任管理现状的基础上,从企业的角度提出了我国企业社会责任管理的思路,指出企业战略管理高度加强企业社会责任管理.     

推动中小企业履行社会责任的几点思考

中小企业作为现代经济社会的重要组成部分,在创造GDP、缴纳税收、提供就业岗位等方面发挥了重要作用。然而由于中小企业社会责任意识较弱,对什么要承担社会责任,对谁承担责任,如何承担责任不太清晰,为推动中小企业履行社会责任提出几点建议:加强法制建设;维护良好的经济环境;加强与论建设。     

中国企业社会责任的战略思考

随着经济社会的发展,企业只追求经济利益的时代已经过去,企业在创造经济效益的同时,应当为相关利益群体承担相应的责任。因此,将企业的社会责任融入到企业战略管理的过程中,持续高效地履行社会责任将会实现企业与社会的双赢。     

Professional Ethical Standards,Corporate Social Responsibility,and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility

This study explored several proposed relationships among professional ethical standards, corporate social responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Data were collected from 313 business managers registered with a large professional research association with a mailed self-report questionnaire. Mediated regression analysis indicated that perceptions of corporate social responsibility partially mediated the positive relationship between perceived professional ethical standards and the believed importance of ethics and social responsibility. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility also fully mediated the negative relationship between perceived professional ethical standards and the subordination of ethics and social responsibility. The results suggested that professions should develop ethical standards to encourage social responsibility, since these actions are associated with enhanced employee ethical attitudes. Sean Valentine (D.B.A., Louisiana Tech University) is an Associate Professor of Management in the College of Business at the University of Wyoming. His research interests include ethical decision making, organizational culture, and job attitudes. His research has appeared in journals such as Human Relations, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, and Journal of Business Research. Gary Fleischman (Ph.D., Texas Tech University) is an Associate Professor of Accounting and the McGee Hearne and Paiz Faculty Scholar in Accounting at the University of Wyoming. His teaching expertise is in accounting and entrepreneurship, and his research interests are in business ethics and behavioral business research. He has published in journals such as Behavioral Research in Accounting, The International Journal of Accounting, and Journal of Business Ethics.     

Ambition Versus Conscience, Does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay off? The Application of Matching Methods

In this article, we examine the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firms’ financial performance (CSR-effect). Two competing hypotheses, social impact hypothesis and shift of focus hypothesis, are proposed to investigate this issue, where the former suggests that CSR has a positive relation with performance and the latter are opposite. In order to ensure the CSR-effect is not contaminated by other factors or samples are randomly drawn, we employ four matching methods, Nearest, Caliper, Mahala and Mahala Caliper to match the samples of CSR (CSR-firms) and without CSR (NonCSR-firms) with similar characteristics. Although four methods yield slightly different results, firms engaging in CSR activities tend to obtain significantly higher values on pretax income to net sales and profit margin, and adopting CSR at the very least not deteriorate the performance of firms, making our conclusion favors the social impact hypothesis and against shift of focus hypothesis in Taiwan. Thus, ambition and conscience are not conflicting with each other.     

社会责任与可持续发展的逻辑

“业社会责任与可持续发展是两个不同的概念,不能混着使用。”这是在一次研讨会上一位社会责任专家的提醒。的确,它们产生的时间不一样：一个是在上世纪初,一个则是在上世纪中叶以后;产生的背景也不一样：一个是针对企业而言,一个则是针对整个人类社会发展所需的环境资源而言。     

企业信用与企业社会责任

企业社会责任的内涵目前在国际社会没有达成共识,它是根据企业在社会中面临的突出问题及与社会、利益相关者的博弈而不断变化的。从企业基本性质和利益相关者角度分析,其基本内涵是经济责任与法律责任。就目前我国企业面临的突出问题而言,应更强调经济责任与法律责任,也就是信用责任。企业信用是企业社会责任的基本内容,是落实企业社会责任的有效手段,我国建立信用机制必须大力发挥大众、政府、企业家和法制的力量。     

The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics

The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics (BE) is both a practical and theoretical issue. Unlike the traditional way of clarifying the relationship through identifying and comparing the extant definitions of the two terms, this study addresses and compares CSR and BE from three perspectives (basic concepts, academic fields, and social movements) in two analytical dimensions (in practice and in theory). This study indicates that: The relationship between the concept of CSR and BE is different from either the relationship between CSR as an academic field and BE as another academic field or the relationship between CSR as a movement and BE as another movement; within the relationships of the two concepts, fields and movements, the relationship between them in practice is different from that in theory; and CSR and BE are neither totally independent nor one of mutual inclusion, rather, they have similarities and differences.     

论德性与良心的关系

德性是人优秀品质中的一种,即道德品质,而良心是人的基本道德感,也是人的自我道德控制机制。德性和良心是个人道德的两个基本方面,两者之间存在着异同,也存在着相互影响、相互作用的复杂机制和重要的互动关系。一个人要成为有道德的人,既要有德性,也要有良心,二者缺一不可。     

Shareholders and Social Responsibility

The article presents an analysis and critique of Milton Friedman’s argument that the social responsibility of business is merely to increase its profits. The analysis uncovers a central claim that Friedman implies, but does not explicitly defend, namely that the shareholders of a corporation have no duty to direct that corporation’s management to exercise social responsibility. An argument against this claim is then advanced by way of a convergence strategy, whereby multiple influential moral approaches are shown to align themselves against Friedman. The convergence strategy shows that Friedman’s position lies on the lonely fringes of Western moral thought, and that at least some of Friedman’s professed adherents appear to offer incoherent moral views. The convergence strategy is shown to suggest, but not entail, a stakeholder model of the corporation. The article concludes by considering two objections.     

Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise

In this article, we contend that due to their size and emphasis upon addressing external social concerns, the corporate relationship between social enterprises, social awareness and action is more complex than whether or not these organisations engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR). This includes organisations that place less emphasis on CSR as well as other organisations that may be very proficient in CSR initiatives, but are less successful in recording practices. In this context, we identify a number of internal CSR markers that may be applied to measuring the extent to which internal CSR practices are being observed. These considerations may be contrasted with the evidence that community based CSR activities is often well developed in private sector small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) (Observatory of European SMEs, 2002), a situation which may be replicated in social enterprises especially those that have grown from micro-enterprises embedded in local communities. We place particular emphasis upon the implications for employee management. Underpinning our position is the Aristotelian-informed capabilities approach, a theory of human development and quality of life, developed by Sen (1992; 1999) and Nussbaum (1999) which has been developed further, in an organisational context, (e.g., Cornelius, 2002); Cornelius and Gagnon, 2004; Gagnon and Cornelius, 1999; Vogt, 2005. We contend that the capabilities approach offers additional insights into CSR in social enterprises in general and internal CSR activity in particular. Our article concludes with proposals for future research initiatives and reflections upon social enterprise development from a capabilities perspective.     

企业社会责任对员工角色外行为的影响机制

文章旨在揭示企业社会责任对内部利益相关者的行为的影响效果及影响机制,为此,把员工角色外行为作为结果变量,把员工关于企业社会责任的共享知觉(企业社会责任)作为自变量,把员工对组织的信任(组织信任)作为中介变量,探讨企业社会责任对员工角色外行为的直接影响,以及组织信任在两者之间的中介效应。通过对80家企业的696名在职员工进行问卷调查,采用多层线性模型技术对样本数据进行统计分析,文章研究发现,员工关于企业自发责任(针对社会和非社会组织、消费者和员工的责任)的共享知觉对员工角色外行为有显著的影响,而且组织信任在两者关系中起部分中介作用,相反,员工关于企业基本责任(对政府的责任)的共享知觉对员工角色外行为的影响不显著,对组织信任的影响也不显著。基于研究结论,文章提出了相应的管理建议和未来的研究方向。