Regression-based Monte Carlo methods for stochastic control models: variable annuities with lifelong guarantees

We present regression-based Monte Carlo simulation algorithm for solving the stochastic control models associated with pricing and hedging of the guaranteed lifelong withdrawal benefit (GLWB) in variable annuities, where the dynamics of the underlying fund value is assumed to evolve according to the stochastic volatility model. The GLWB offers a lifelong withdrawal benefit, even when the policy account value becomes zero, while the policyholder remains alive. Upon death, the remaining account value will be paid to the beneficiary as a death benefit. The bang-bang control strategy analysed under the assumption of maximization of the policyholder’s expected cash flow reduces the strategy space of optimal withdrawal policies to three choices: zero withdrawal, withdrawal at the contractual amount or complete surrender. The impact on the GLWB value under various withdrawal behaviours of the policyholder is examined. We also analyse the pricing properties of GLWB subject to different model parameter values and structural features.     

Primal–dual quasi-Monte Carlo simulation with dimension reduction for pricing American options

The pricing of American options is one of the most challenging problems in financial engineering due to the involved optimal stopping time problem, which can be solved by using dynamic programming (DP). But applying DP is not always practical, especially when the state space is high dimensional. However, the curse of dimensionality can be overcome by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. We can get lower and upper bounds by MC to ensure that the true price falls into a valid confidence interval. During the recent decades, progress has been made in using MC simulation to obtain both the lower bound by least-squares Monte Carlo method (LSM) and the upper bound by duality approach. However, there are few works on pricing American options using quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, especially to compute the upper bound. For comparing the sample variances and standard errors in the numerical experiments, randomized QMC (RQMC) methods are usually used. In this paper, we propose to use RQMC to replace MC simulation to compute both the lower bound (by the LSM) and the upper bound (by the duality approach). Moreover, we propose to use dimension reduction techniques, such as the Brownian bridge, principal component analysis, linear transformation and the gradients based principle component analysis. We perform numerical experiments on American–Asian options and American max-call options under the Black–Scholes model and the variance gamma model, in which the options have the path-dependent feature or are written on multiple underlying assets. We find that RQMC in combination with dimension reduction techniques can significantly increase the efficiency in computing both the lower and upper bounds, resulting in better estimates and tighter confidence intervals of the true price than pure MC simulation.     

American option pricing with discrete and continuous time models: An empirical comparison

This paper considers discrete time GARCH and continuous time SV models and uses these for American option pricing. We first of all show that with a particular choice of framework the parameters of the SV models can be estimated using simple maximum likelihood techniques. We then perform a Monte Carlo study to examine their differences in terms of option pricing, and we study the convergence of the discrete time option prices to their implied continuous time values. Finally, a large scale empirical analysis using individual stock options and options on an index is performed comparing the estimated prices from discrete time models to the corresponding continuous time model prices. The results show that, while the overall differences in performance are small, for the in the money put options on individual stocks the continuous time SV models do generally perform better than the discrete time GARCH specifications.     

Backward simulation methods for pricing American options under the CIR process

In this paper, we focus on backward simulation of the CIR process. The purpose is to solve the memory requirement issue of the Least Squares Monte Carlo method when pricing American options by simulation. The concept of backward simulation is presented and it is classified into two types. Under the framework of the second type backward simulation, we seek the solutions for the existing CIR schemes. Specifically, we propose forward–backward simulation approaches for Alfonsi’s two implicit schemes, the fixed Euler schemes and the exact scheme. The proposed schemes are numerically tested and compared in pricing American options under the Heston model and the stochastic interest rate model. Some numerical properties such as the convergence order of the explicit–implicit Euler schemes, the storage requirement estimation of the forward–backward exact scheme and its computing time comparison with the squared Bessel bridge are also tested. Finally, the pros and cons of the related backward simulation schemes are summarized.     

Pricing and capital requirements for with profit contracts: modelling considerations

The aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of alternative frameworks for the fair valuation of life insurance contracts with a predominant financial component, in terms of impact on the market consistent price of the contracts, the embedded options, and the capital requirements for the insurer. In particular, we model the dynamics of the log-returns of the reference fund using the so-called Merton (1976 Merton, RC. 1976. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J. Finan. Econ., : 125–144.  [Google Scholar]) process, which is given by the sum of an arithmetic Brownian motion and a compound Poisson process, and the Variance Gamma (VG) process introduced by Madan and Seneta (1990 Madan, DB and Seneta, E. 1990. The variance gamma (VG) model for share market returns. J. Bus., 63: 511–524. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and further refined by Madan and Milne (1991 Madan, DB and Milne, F. 1991. Option pricing with VG martingale components. Math. Finan., 1: 39–45. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) and Madan et al. (1998 Madan, DB, Carr, P and Chang, E. 1998. The variance gamma process and option pricing. Eur. Finan. Rev., 2: 79–105. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). We conclude that, although the choice of the market model does not affect significantly the market consistent price of the overall benefit due at maturity, the consequences of a model misspecification on the capital requirements are noticeable.