共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 91 毫秒
1.
2.
本文运用经典的风险调整指标,对我国十支晨星评级表现优异的开放式基金的业绩进行再评定。样本选用自2006年1月至2008年2月的最新数据,时间跨度两年有余,既包含市场上涨期,也包含震荡调整期,增加了对基金选股择时能力的实证结果的可信度。 相似文献
3.
本文根据CAPM的基本原理,在借助国内外相关研究成果的基础上,运用收益率指标,风险指标,三大单因素整体业绩指数(Jensen指数、Treynor指数、Sharpe指数)对我国2002年12月31日之前成立的31只股票型的封闭式基金的业绩表现进行全面的实证分析.实证结果表明,总体上我国封闭式基金的收益率高于市场基准组合的收益率,经风险调整后,封闭式基金的业绩也优于市场基准组合, 相似文献
4.
现代投资理论认为,只有经风险调整后的收益才可以作为相互比较的基础来评价投资基金的投资业绩.因此,基金业绩评价的核心应该是对其所面临的风险进行准确的计量.通过对我国开放式基金应用基于VaR的评价方法与三大经典评价方法进行业绩评价的比较分析发现,从投资者注重下跌风险的角度来看,基于VaR的基金业绩评价指标相对于三大经典指标有较明显的应用优势,投资者又多一种能符合自己风险偏好的评价指标作为投资参考. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
《中国证券期货》2019,(5)
随着绿色环保事业日益成为社会的焦点,出现了不少绿色企业、绿色基金,其中,绿色证券投资基金在绿色发展之中的作用日趋重要,但是有关近期绿色基金的发展和业绩状况的研究较为稀少。为此,本文使用国际通行基金业绩评价方法:特雷诺指数法、夏普比率法、詹森指数法、M2测度法,选取中国市场的若干只绿色证券投资基金为样本进行分析。同时,选取沪深300指数为比较的标准,将中国绿色基金和沪深300指数的各项结果进行比较,以是否超越沪深300为评价业绩的原则。此外,本文在绿色基金业绩评价研究过程中,兼顾了方法间的对比分析。研究结果表明:通过多种方法实证和比较分析可得,中国绿色证券投资基金的业绩大部分不能超过沪深300,不能带来超额收益,业绩一般;不同的分析方法得出的结果具有一致性,但是也有轻微的差异性。最后,本文简单分析了原因,并提出相关政策启示。 相似文献
9.
11.
In this paper, we examine the performance of a sample of fifteen U.S.-based internationally diversified mutual funds between 1982 and 1988. Two performance measures are used, the Jensen measure and the positive period weighting measure proposed by Grinblatt and Titman. We find no evidence that the funds, either individually or as a whole, provide investors with performance that surpasses that of a broad, international equity index over this sample period. 相似文献
12.
13.
本文从多个角度对基金绩效衡量问题进行了论述,系统地回顾和总结了各种基金绩效衡量的理论与方法.实证分析表明,基金经理带来的选择收益比较明显,基金的择股能力有效地降低了系统风险. 相似文献
14.
本文运用了DEA法的Malmquist指数刻画了我国开放式基金业生产效率的动态变化,并对我国基金业业绩进行了整体评价。通过对全要素生产率的分解,本文得出全要素生产率动态变化的推动因素,指出技术效率对于中国基金业发展的重要作用。在此基础上,本文就适合中国基金业特点的系统的基金业绩评价体系的构建,提出了一些建议和意见。 相似文献
15.
美国基金公司治理结构的实证研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
美国共同基金大多采取公司型治理模式。与一般公司相类似,基金公司的董事会职责是监督公司运作、确保公司政策的执行;不同之处在于基金公司的董事会更扮演了一种“watchdog”的角色,其最重要的职能是保护投资的利益。 相似文献
16.
基金招募说明书比较研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
基金招募说明书的本质是一种类似上市公司招股说明书的销售件,但它不同于上市公司招股说明书之处还在于它类似于保险机构的保单,是与投资签订的一个合约。分析比较表明,各国或地区的基金招募说明书在形式和内容上均存在较大的差异,不少内容可资借鉴。 相似文献
17.
International mutual funds allow individual investors to diversify abroad at a reasonable cost. This paper tests whether international funds that actively engage in country and security selection outperform passive global benchmarks. We apply a mean-variance efficiency test that incorporates the practical prohibition against short sales of open-end mutual funds. Our tests reject the efficiency of the world equity market portfolio over the sample period, and our funds as a group outperform the inefficient world index. However, we find no evidence of security selectivity ability using a 12-country benchmark. We do find that active international funds provide global diversification benefits. Tests using the Positive Period Weight (PPW) measure of Grinblatt and Titman (1989), which is robust to nonlinearity in fund and benchmark returns, yield similar results. 相似文献
18.
Jianhua Gang 《新兴市场金融与贸易》2016,52(9):2056-2068
In this article, we evaluate the performance of mutual funds in China between 2006 and 2014. We first estimate time-varying abnormal returns of each mutual fund using an active peer benchmark-augmented factor pricing model. An index of riskiness is then estimated and used to calculate the augmented performance measure (APM). By construction, the APM separates the managerial premium of the fund from systematic risk premium, so it is better than the economic performance measure. The APM incorporates information beyond the first and second moments of the distribution of fund abnormal return; therefore, it is more informative than the Sharpe ratio. 相似文献
19.
20.
Funds with performance fees have annual net risk-adjusted returns of 0.50% below other funds, a result mostly due to funds without a stochastic benchmark against which performance is measured and funds with a benchmark that is easy to beat. For other funds, there is no evidence of underperformance. Performance fee funds charge total expenses, including the performance fee, that are substantially higher than those of other funds. Investors are more likely to punish poor performance in funds with performance fees than in other funds. Our results indicate that even when fees are less regulated, investors can generally be relied upon to make the right choices, but that there are a subset of funds where performance fees are employed to extract additional fees from investors. 相似文献