流行的谬误：会计诚信的认识误区

会计诚信危机已成为大众耳熟能详的话题，但人们对此仍存在诸多认识上的误区。本文对几种流行的谬误如“会计诚信危机是由会计人员道德低下造成的”、“会计诚信是会计人员的诚信”、“资本市场不发达是酿就会计诚信危机的环境驱动”、“会计诚信危机只是一种暂时的秩序混乱”作出——驳斥。     

浅析会计诚信

市场经济是诚信经济，会计业更应是诚信行业。目前会计行业面临严重的“诚信危机”，如何恢复并发展已有的诚信，重塑会计行业的诚信，是我们面临着的紧迫而艰巨的任务。     

会计诚信的思考

近几年中外会计信息严重失真的现实，使得会计诚信危机成为大众耳热能详的话题，但人们对此存在诸多认识上的误区。事实上，会计诚信危机是因为会计陷入了“囚徒困境”，而市场经济发展的不充分，垄断现象的存在，则导致了会计诚信原则的实现具有很大的相对性。解决问题的可行方法是让单位领导人成为会计法律责任的第一责任人，这样才有望真正确立会计的诚信原则。     

提高我国会计诚信水平的措施与途径

会计诚信是市场经济的要求。近年来会计诚信问题成了社会热点,各界议论纷纷,“会计信息失真”、“会计假账泛滥”、“会计道德失范”等字眼充斥报章杂志,会计诚信问题成了媒体关注的焦点。会计诚信缺失增加了交易成本,加大了企业生存的隐形危机,降低了经济运行效率。会计诚信问题受到了全社会的关注。     

论会计诚信

近些年来，会计诚信问题被全社会所关注。特别是在银广夏、卖科特、ST黎明等一系列上市公司会计造假案件被曝光后，像一枚枚重磅炸弹炸开：前年年底美国发生的“安然事件”，以及近年来的世界通信公司、施乐公司的造假案，则引发了一场严重的国际性会计危机，会计的信誉受到了严重损害。面对严重的会计诚信危机，正确理解会计诚信、不诚信的会计信息形成的原因，不诚信的会计信息的危害以及如何重塑会计诚信是我们面临的重要课题。     

浅析会计诚信缺失原因及解决对策

会计诚信是会计与生俱来的品质，是会计行业赖以生存的基础。而由于经济利益的驱动、会计信息不对称及违规成本低廉等原因，以及近几年来中外会计信息严重失真的情况屡屡发生。使会计行业面临“诚信危机”的挑战。因此针对当前会计诚信缺失的现状，分析会计诚信缺失的内在及外在原因，重点从会计行业的角度出发，提出减少会计诚信缺失的基本对策。     

国有企业会计诚信危机的实证研究

该文针对会计诚信的现状,通过对会计诚信危机的成因进行调查分析,认为会计人员实施舞弊并非出于其本意,“治”好单位负责人才是治理国有企业会计诚信危机的当务之急。作者从改变政府职能、完善国有企业法人治理结构、建立完善的监控与惩戒机制等三方面提出了治理会计诚信危机的对策。     

论会计诚信

近些年来，会计诚信问题被全社会所关注。特别是在银广夏、卖科特、ST黎明等一系列上市公司会计造假案件被曝光后．像一枚枚重磅炸弹炸开；前年年底美国发生的“安然事件”．以及近年来的世界通信公司、施乐公司的造假案，则引发了一场严重的国际性会计危机，会计的信誉受到了严重损害。面对严重的会计诚信危机．正确理解会计诚信、不诚信的会计信息形成的原因、不诚信的会计信息的危害以及如何重塑会计诚信是我们面临的重要课题。     

强化会计诚信建设 促进信息质量提高

本文主要介绍了会计诚信的概念、我国会计诚信危机产生的原因分析以及加强会计诚信，提高信息质量的措施。     

浅谈会计行业诚信危机的原因和对策

会计是诚信行业，如果会计失之诚信，弄虚作假，欺诈舞弊，会计关系得以存在的基础就会随之崩塌，会计业的生命力也就随之完结。近年来相继曝光的“中农信”倒闭、科龙电器财务报告失实、科达股份遭遇证监会调查等等事件似乎都在揭示：中国会计正面临着“信用沼泽”、“诚信危机”。使会计业的公信力受到严峻挑战，对会计业的发展带来了严重的不利影响。提升会计从业人员的诚信水平已成为整顿和规范市场经济秩序的重要举措和当务之急。     

A Rich Vein for “Reality Mining”北大核心CSSCISSCI

Arik Hesseldahl In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, U.S. officials quickly turned their attention to other potential targets, including California's Golden Gate Bridge. What would happen if terrorists took down the bridge between San Francisco and Marin County? How much of the region would be affected and for how long?     

John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Justice

John Stuart Mill has traditionally been portrayed as self-contradictory and failing to construct a unified social theory. Recent scholarship, however, has challenged this view, finding Mill's work to be creatively synthetic in bridging the antinomies inherent in liberal democratic thought. This revisionist interpretation of Mill is advanced by an understanding of his theory of justice and its role in shaping his policy positions on issues such as welfare, education, voting rights, property rights, taxation, government intervention, and the future of capitalism.     

中国养活自己能力的长期预测:技术和政策分析

中国拥有世界五分之一强的人口 ,收入又在迅速增长。因此 ,国际上很自然地会考虑或推测她在今后的几十年是否有能力养活自己。中国的人口预计将从 2 0 0 0年的 1 2 8亿增长到 2 0 2 0年的 1 4 6亿 ,和 2 0 3 0年的 1 4 9亿。与此同时 ,人均收入的增长将导致对家畜和鱼类产品更大的需求 ,因而对饲料的需求也将有很大的增长     

John Stuart Mill's Theories of Wealth and Income Distribution

Although he was much influenced by David Ricardo when he wrote the classical part of his Principles , John Stuart Mill was not a Ricardian when he penned his theories of wealth and distribution. They are based on a triple foundation. First, a belief that economics is a moral discipline. Second a theory of custom-driven human behavior. Third, an empirically formed conviction that the institutions of state, education and business cooperate to structure the distribution of income. On the basis of these presuppositions, Mill formulated 1) an institutional theory of the formation of human and non-human wealth and 2) an even more institutional theory of distribution demonstrating how the aforementioned institutions malignantly skew the distribution of income to the advantage of the propertied classes and to the extreme disadvantage of the working class. As a social economist, Mill recommended institutional reforms designed to eradicate the poverty of the working class.     

Toward a Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Organizational Life

Synopsis Classification is an important activity that facilitates theory development in many academic disciplines. Scholars in fields such as organizational science, management science and economics and have long recognized that classification offers an approach for ordering and understanding the diversity of organizational taxa (groups of one or more similar organizational entities). However, even the most prominent organizational classifications have limited utility, as they tend to be shaped by a specific research bias, inadequate units of analysis and a standard neoclassical economic view that does not naturally accommodate the disequilibrium dynamics of modern competition. The result is a relatively large number of individual and unconnected organizational classifications, which tend to ignore the processes of change responsible for organizational diversity. Collectively they fail to provide any sort of universal system for ordering, compiling and presenting knowledge on organizational diversity. This paper has two purposes. First, it reviews the general status of the major theoretical approaches to biological and organizational classification and compares the methods and resulting classifications derived from each approach. Definitions of key terms and a discussion on the three principal schools of biological classification (evolutionary systematics, phenetics and cladistics) are included in this review. Second, this paper aims to encourage critical thinking and debate about the use of the cladistic classification approach for inferring and representing the historical relationships underpinning organizational diversity. This involves examining the feasibility of applying the logic of common ancestry to populations of organizations. Consequently, this paper is exploratory and preparatory in style, with illustrations and assertions concerning the study and classification of organizational diversity.     

Information infrastructure: Who builds broadband networks?

This paper examines the essential difference between the U.S. and Japan, when one considers information infrastructure. There are seven perception gaps between the U.S. and Japan concerning Information Infrastructure policies. These gaps must be understood in order to compare the countries' governmental policies in this area. In looking at the present circumstances, the essential question to answer concerns who is to build, own and operate the network(s) of the infrastructure. Liberalization is certain to be a central factor in the ongoing telecommunications debates. Now that customers have had a taste of the liberalized market-place, the movement toward more open markets will be difficult to stop. When considering options, it is necessary to pay close attention to standardized network access and the increasingly important role software plays. These issues are causing us to take a new approach to the traditional role played by regulators. They also force a closer look at the appropriate structure of utility companies. This paper addresses the above issues in hopes of stimulating dialog on the new telecommunications infrastructure paradigm.     

海岛地区产业演替及资源基础分析--以舟山群岛为例

改革开放以来,舟山市产业构成发生了显著变化,其经济发展过程可以划分为三个阶段。1992年前,是以产业结构渔业占绝对地位的单一结构阶段;1993—1998年,以旅游业为主的第三产业快速发展阶段;上世纪末以来,又进入了新一轮的经济发展时期,即工业产值比重快速增加阶段。根据海岛的自然资源基础和特点,在新世纪的经济发展过程中,舟山市应定位为生态型的港口旅游城市。以港口及临港工业为主导,以海岛旅游和海洋经济为特色,大力发展第二产业和第三产业。海岛地区的主导产业应体现海岛资源优势及区位优势,以集群性环保型产业为主。同时由于海岛地区淡水资源缺乏,主导产业也应着重选择低耗水型产业。     

风险视角下企业治理结构和研发创新——基于委托代理模型的研究

本文基于委托代理模型,从风险的视角研究企业治理结构对研发创新能力的影响。本文构建了一个包含创新活动的委托代理模型进行理论分析,利用动态DEA 模型测算创新能力,并使用2015-2018年我国上市制造业企业数据进行实证检验。实证部分检验了理论结论:委托代理问题不利于企业提升研发创新能力,且客观风险和主观风险厌恶会加剧该负面影响。基于此,本文认为上市企业应根据企业自身研发活动特点有针对性地改善企业治理结构,提出了适当延长代理人任期、推动股权激励计划、提升代理人的风险承担能力等建议。     

研发过程模型优化——研发过程任意阶段知识运作模型研究

本文拟通过对三个现有研发过程模型的评述,结合其他相关文献的回顾以及当前企业界所能够提供的技术服务,对研发过程模型予以优化,并尝试提出了‘研发过程任意阶段知识运作模型”来探讨“知识在研发过程中究竟是如何运作的”的问题,以期能够为当前的企业界和学术界的研发过程运作模式的完善提供有益参考。