虚拟企业合作伙伴评价模型理论基础探讨

一、评价模型的经济与管理学理论基础(一)交易成本理论交易成本概念由诺贝尔经济学奖获得者科斯教授提出,经威廉姆森等人发展成为现代经济学的一个分支——交易成本经济学。交易成本经济学是以交易为基本分析单位,研究经济组织的比较制度理论,属于新制度经济学的范畴。根据威廉姆森的定义,交易成本包括事前成本和事后成本。事前部分包括协议的起草、谈判和维护等成本;事后部分包括交易偏     

交易成本视角下煤矿安全治理的制度分析——兼论国有煤矿企业改革的新思路

矿难是我国当前煤矿生产面临的重大难题,直接关系到煤矿生产的可持续性,不仅严重影响资源的合理配置,还严重影响社会稳定。按照传统经济学思维,对于负外部性较强的煤矿企业,应当征收庇古税,但这是以交易成本为零作为假设前提,并不适用于产权制度不健全的发展中国家,尤其是我国当前的经济发展阶段。而以科斯、威廉姆森为代表的新制度经济学...     

交易成本学说的发展与批判

自1937年科斯提出交易成本的概念以来,在20多年的停滞之后,交易成本学说取得了重大的发展,本文对交易成本学说进行了总结与回顾,并阐述该理论的一些批判观点以及对现实的指导意义。     

诚信是契约得以履行的基础

在阿罗一德布鲁范式所描述的完全竞争的市场状态中,价格信息唯一性的反映了资源的稀缺度,并指导了资源的有效配置.古典经济学的这一假定是一个没有交易费用的社会,宛如自然界没有摩擦力一样,是非现实的.在古典经济学交易中(仅仅有一次交易),信任问题并没有出现.在交易成本经济学的分析框架中,威廉姆森以单一的算计性标准作为分析工具同样具有极其明显的局限性.     

从交易成本经济学的角度分析钢铁企业营销渠道的构建

一、交易成本学说的有关理论(一)交易成本的定义。交易成本的定义多种多样。科斯认为,交易成本是获得准确的市场信息所需要付出的成本,以及谈判和经常性契约的成本。威廉姆森认为,交易成本分为两部分:一是事先的交易成本,即为签订契约、规定交易双方的权利、责任等所花费的成本     

在市场经济中政府角色不能缺失

我以前听过威廉姆森先生的讲座,二三十年过去了,我觉得今天听懂的部分比那时候大大增强了。我知道经济学有一个分支,其中威廉姆森命名的新制度经济学,因为有学术的发展,使我们对于真实世界当中组织和制度有了更深的理解,     

交易成本经济学建模问题探讨

交易成本经济学由于缺乏合适的数理模型而饱受批评,所以建模问题是交易成本经济学迫切需要解决的问题。文章分析了交易成本经济学从简化模型到结构模型的发展,同时指出了交易成本经济学在建模方面存在的实际困难和可能的发展方向。     

交易成本理论探析

近些年来,现代金融经济学的研究者和证券市场的从业者已经开始关注交易成本的研究,西方和中国的金融经济学领域均有相关的文献研究。本文试图对前人的研究成果进行总结,以期对后来者有所帮助。     

央企更应重视增本增效朱

科斯认为,企业的存在是因为通过企业内部一定的制度安排产生的交易费用（或交易成本）低于通过市场安排产生的交易费用。据此理论,降低交易费用就是企业的生存之道,是企业的效率所在。张五常在对科斯理论的解释中,将交易费用概括为寻找信息、（合同）谈判和履行合同的总成本。这三类成本几乎涵盖了企业的所有行为。因此,在科斯开创的、张五常和威廉姆森发扬的新制度经济学的企业理论中,降低成本就是增加企业效率。“降本增效”是同义重复的。     

国外交易成本经济学实证研究应用领域的扩展

近年来,国外交易成本经济学的实证研究领域已从传统的产业组织经济学扩展到了市场营销、财务管理、会计、关系型契约等多个领域。本文对国外交易成本经济学在这些领域的实证研究作了简要的回顾,希望能够为我们的研究提供参考。     

市场营销起源的交易成本经济学解释

信息不对称和交易成本的存在严重影响了市场交易活动的有效进行,不利于分工的深化和生产效率的提高,进而又影响了社会整体利益的提高。市场营销正是为了解决以上交易难题而产生的,营销组合同样是通过降低信息不对称的程度和减少交易成本而发挥其作用的。从交易成本经济学的角度解释市场营销的起源,可以揭示出营销学与经济学之间的内在联系,为营销理论的深化提供了一个新的切入点,并且为营销实践提供了理论支撑。     

TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS: THE PRECURSORS

Theories commonly progress through four stages, from informal to pre‐formal to semi‐formal and fully formal. This paper reports on the earliest stage of transaction cost economics that extended from the 1920s to the 1970s. That the gestation stage lasted so long is partly because transaction cost economics departed significantly from the then‐prevailing economic orthodoxy. Also, and related, it is an interdisciplinary undertaking. As reported herein, transaction cost economics selectively combines economics, organisation theory and law and is the product of the contributions of some of the finest minds in those three fields.     

Transaction cost economics in Scandinavian business administration

This Introduction briefly surveys transaction cost economics and explains its general relevance for business administration. A discussion of the impact of transaction cost economics on Scandinavian work in business administration is offered, after which the contributions to the present Special Issue are introduced.     

Transaction cost economics and business administration

This paper traces the origins of transaction cost economics to three seminal people who had an intense interest in business: Ronald Coase, Chester Barnard, and Herbert Simon. By contrast with the neoclassical theory of the firm, which is a top-down construction, the transaction cost economics theory of the firm is a bottom-up construction—which is to say that it is much more microanalytic (the transaction is made the basic unit of analysis) and is comparative in its mode of analysis. Several top-down maxims that have their origins in economic theory are examined in a bottom-up way, which serves to uncover conceptual and/or implementation problems with each. I furthermore examine growing applications of transaction cost reasoning to business administration and within the social sciences.     

企业融资交易的契约安排：一个交易费用经济学的分析框架

交易费用经济学理论将股权契约和债权契约视为对融资交易不同的契约治理结构。债权契约具有古典契约的特征,是一种按规则运作的契约治理结构;股权契约具有弹性治理的特征,是一种关系型契约治理结构。依据交易费用经济学理论关于交易与契约匹配的一般机理,可以得出融资交易的契约安排机理:低资产专用性融资交易选择债权契约,高资产专用性融资交易选择股权契约,中等资产专用性融资交易选择混合性融资契约,这既可达到交易费用的最小化,又可实现交易效率的最大化。究竟哪类契约在现实融资契约安排中占主导地位,这取决于融资交易包含的资产专用性大小。     

Antecedents of vertical integration: Transaction cost economics and resource-based explanations

This article focuses on antecedents of vertical integration. A model of vertical integration derived from transaction cost economics and the resource-based view is tested empirically with data from the mechanical maintenance services market in the hydroelectricity industry. The results show that asset specificity and closeness to present competence are positively related to vertical integration, while tacit knowledge is negatively related to vertical integration. The positive interaction effect between asset specificity and closeness to present competence on vertical integration is also supported, indicating that the decisions on insourcing and outsourcing can benefit from using transaction cost economics and the resource-based view in tandem.     

Real Options, International Entry Mode Choice and Performance

abstract    Recent scholarship suggests that combining insights from real option theory with transaction cost economics may improve decision-making models. In response to this suggestion we develop and test a model of international entry mode choice that draws from both perspectives. Examining samples of Dutch and Greek firms entering Central and Eastern European markets, we found that adding real option variables to a transaction cost model significantly improved its explanatory power. Additionally, firms that used the combined real option/transaction cost predicted choices had significantly higher levels of subsidiary performance satisfaction than firms that did not. Our results suggest that effective managerial decision-making may involve more than mere transaction cost minimization considerations; real option value creation insights also appear to influence the success of decision outcomes.     

The impact of knowledge diversity: Integrating two economic perspectives through the dynamic capability approach

This paper analyzes the two economic perspectives underlying the contradictory results of existing studies regarding the relationship between diversity and performance and integrates them using the dynamic capability approach. Transaction cost economics suggests that knowledge diversity has a negative impact on cost-saving performance, whereas evolutionary economics suggests that knowledge diversity has a positive impact on value-creation performance. According to the dynamic capability approach, the perspective of transaction cost economics is shown to relate to ordinary capabilities, whereas the perspective of evolutionary economics is shown to relate to dynamic capabilities. The former should be pursued in subservience to the latter.     

Uncovering the hidden transaction costs of market power: A property rights approach to strategic positioning

A central construct in competitive strategy research is market power, the ability to raise price above marginal cost. Positioning research focuses on attempts to build, protect, and exercise market power. However, this approach contains hidden assumptions about transaction costs. Parties made worse off by the exercise of market power can negotiate, bargain, form coalitions, and otherwise contract around the focal firm's attempts to appropriate monopoly profits—depending on transaction costs. We build on property rights economics to explain how transaction costs affect positioning and offer propositions about successful positioning in an environment with transaction costs.