新会计准则对上市公司利润的影响探析

我国新会计准则体系建立于2006年2月,由我国的财政部主持发布,2007年元月首先对上市公司实行。执行新会计准则后,对我国上市企业的财务、企业经营将会产生巨大且深远的影响。特别是公允价值的提出与运用及减值准备的一些新的规定,对上市公司利润的影响是重大而深远的。本文从存货管理、减值准备、投资性房地产公允价值核算等三个方面的改变入手来分析新会计准则对我国上市公司经营情况所产生的影响。     

浅析新会计准则下的企业税收筹划

<正>我国新的会计准则体系自2007年开始在上市公司执行,不长时间后,也开始在所有的大中型企业执行。新会计准则的实施标志着我国的会计已经进入了一个新的时代,说明我国与国际惯例趋同的、适应市场经济发展的准则体系已经正式建立。新会计准则的实施对我国经济的影响是深远的,对于完善我国的市场经济体制、推动资本市场的发展、提高对外开放的     

论新会计准则对会计计量的影响

我国的新会计准则体系已从2007年1月1日起开始实施.新实施的准则,对企业所提供的会计信息既有积极的影响,也是新的考验,企业必须深入领会会计准则的内涵,注重强化上市公司财务信息的质量要求,在资产和交易的反映上更为公允,以提高投资者对企业财务信息可靠性的信心,促进我国上市公司财务会计信息质量的进一步提升,从而适应经济全球...     

论新会计准则对会计计量的影响

我国的新会计准则体系已从2007年1月1日起开始实施。新实施的准则，对企业所提供的会计信息既有积极的影响，也是新的考验，企业必须深入领会会计准则的内涵，注重强化上市公司财务信息的质量要求，在资产和交易的反映上更为公允，以提高投资者对企业财务信息可靠性的信心，促进我国上市公司财务会计信息质量的进一步提升，从而适应经济全球化和资本市场对高质量财务会计信息的需求。     

论新会计准则下上市公司研发费用的披露

近年来,随着我国社会主义经济的不断发展,企业为了不断地提高自身的核心竞争力,上市公司的研发活动也愈发频繁,公司不断增大对研发费用的投入。自2007年1月1日起,新的会计准则在上市公司实行,它在一定程度上对上市公司研发费用的披露起着很大的推动作用。下文将针对新会计准则下上市公司研发费用的披露进行简要分析。     

论新会计准则下上市公司研发费用的披露

近年来,随着我国社会主义经济的不断发展,企业为了不断地提高自身的核心竞争力,上市公司的研发活动也愈发频繁,公司不断增大对研发费用的投入。自2007年1月1日起,新的会计准则在上市公司实行,它在一定程度上对上市公司研发费用的披露起着很大的推动作用。下文将针对新会计准则下上市公司研发费用的披露进行简要分析。     

新会计准则实施与银行信贷风险防范

2007财政部颁布的包括1项基本准则和38项具体准则在内的新的企业会计准则体系首先在上市公司范围内施行。新会计准则的实施,不仅对企业会计人员提出了新的要求,也对商业银行信贷人员如何在新的会计准则体系内分析和评价企业的财务状况,防范和控制信贷风险提出了严峻挑战。一、新会计准则的主要变化     

浅议新会计准则体系对中国上市公司财务信息披露的影响

会计信息披露制度是证券市场制度的核心,会计信息披露直接影响到投资者的价值判断和投资决策。随着中国证券市场的发展,上市公司信息,尤其是会计信息的披露质量对证券市场规范化发展的意义越来越重要。新会计准则体系颁布后,我国上市公司应转换会计思维,学习和充分理解新会计准则的要求,在企业内部推行新的会计准则体系并将其作为深化企业改革的契机,提高企业的信息披露质量。     

新准则如何影响所得税会计?

财政部于2006年2月15日发布了新的企业会计准则,并将于2007年1月1日起在上市公司执行。新会计准则与现行会计准则在会计确认、计量、记录、报告等方面都有较大变化,这些变化都将给我国企业的所得税会计带来重大影响。这些影响,不仅表现为《企业会计准则第18号——所得税》对我国企业选择所得税会计核算方法产生直接影响,还表现为由于会计准则与所得税法之间差异的加大,对所得税会计应用范围等方面的影响。本文就将从这两个层面分析新会计准则体系对我国企业的所得税会计造成的影响,并提出企业在新准则体系下运用所得税会计的对策。新会计准…     

辞旧迎新假账"严打"

2006年2月15日，财政部在人民大会堂同时发布新的会计准则和审计准则体系，这标志着我国与国际惯例趋同的企业会计准则体系和注册会计师审计准则体系正式建立。其中，新会计准则于今年1月1日起正式在上市公司中执行，其他企业鼓励执行。新的会计准则实施之后，将极大地改变财务报表数据，使得上市公司利润在短期内发生剧烈变化，从而带来新的投资机遇和风险。     

Regulatory flexibility and management opportunism in the choice of alternative accounting standards: an illustration based on large French groups

Due to the flexibility of domestic accounting regulations, French groups are entitled to refer to international or American standards for their consolidation. The objective of this research paper is to focus on the choices made by the 100 largest French companies during the last 16 years (1985-2000). In practice, apart from the French rules, three “alternative” sets of standards are used: the International Accounting Standards (IAS), “international principles,” and the U.S. GAAP. The percentage of companies referring to alternative (i.e., non-French) standards rose in the first part of the period, then fell. Additionally, while the number of companies choosing U.S. GAAP increased over the period as a whole, the number preferring IAS or “international principles” has been in sharp decline since 1994-1995. Our results show that in this voluntary move towards international accounting harmonization, the choices made by French companies have clearly varied according to developments in French accounting regulations and the changing power balance between the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) and the SEC-FASB. This indicates a certain degree of opportunism by the management, who clearly keeps one eye constantly on the cost-benefit trade-off.     

新准则实施后上市公司盈余管理研究

新会计准则实施后上市公司会出现哪些盈余管理手段,会利用哪些具体会计准则来进行盈余管理呢?这是当前值得我们深入研究的课题。通过对新会计准则有关规定的解读,笔者认为,以下9个具体会计准则很有可能被上市公司用来作为盈余管理的手段,因而这9个会计准则须引起国家有关会计监管机构和投资者的重点关注。     

商誉减值准则的变迁及启示:国际视野与中国实践

近年来,我国商誉减值乱象频发,很多上市公司因计提巨额商誉减值导致出现巨额亏损,引发了众多学者对商誉计量的高度关注。由于经济发展存在较大差异,不同国家的商誉准则也有很大区别。国际会计准则委员会、美国会计准则委员会及中国财政部会计准则委员会对有关商誉后续处理方法的准则规定存在很大不同,而大多数学者仅选取其中两者进行对比分析。纵观三者来看,我国商誉准则的变化受国际及美国会计准则委员会的综合影响较大,值得通过对比和分析来获得启示,为我国未来商誉准则的发展提供参考。     

Assessing international accounting harmonization in Latin America

We draw on institutional theory and interviews with key informants to assess international accounting harmonization in the 13 countries of the Group of Latin American Accounting Standards Setters (GLASS). Some GLASS countries have effected full formal adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), but in others, IFRS are not permitted. In several GLASS countries, IFRS are supplemented by national standards for micro-entities and cooperatives. We conclude that it will be difficult to achieve material harmonization in GLASS countries due to a lack of trained accountants, unreliable enforcement systems, and competing institutional logics of taxation systems, banks and insurance companies.     

Development of accounting in Iran

The main purpose of this paper is to show the origin, growth and practice of accounting in Iran plus analysis of influential factors such as financial markets, tax policies, privatization, membership in the World Trade Organization, foreign investment, and legal systems. Documents of ancient Iran show that in 550 B.C. (Achaemenid era), all records of public revenues and costs were kept soundly and with remarkable accuracy. These documents display the relentless progress and development of accounting in Iran up until now (pre-Islamic era, post-Islamic era, and contemporary era). During the past two decades, various measures have been adopted to promote and advance accounting in Iran via harmonizing the domestic accounting practices with International norms and standards. Although Iran has employed International Accounting Standards as the basis for developing its National Accounting Standards, there are still some differences between Iranian and international standards, and there are some certain International Accounting Standards that are not applicable in Iran. A host of endemic factors, such as existing laws and rules, religious beliefs, culture, economic and political conditions, have influenced the National Accounting Standards setting processes.     

The impact of the new Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises (ASBE) on financial results of mainland Chinese listed companies

Effective 1st January 2007, 38 new Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises (ASBE) had become applicable to listed companies in mainland China. Research based on these latest standards will help us understand the current accounting harmonisation process in China. Previous studies, though rather scarce, had compared financial statements of companies simultaneously being listed on the mainland and Hong Kong. However, the very recent impact of the new ASBE has not been taken into account. Therefore, the present study focuses on domestic Chinese companies after implementation of the new ASBE. The financial figures of each item reported under the old Chinese Accounting Rules and Regulations and the new ASBE were collected in pairs and were analysed. Except for the test results on total assets and shareholders' equity, the other results revealed no significant differences between the paired figures of net assets per share, operating revenue, profit before tax, net profit, net profit after extraordinary gains and losses, basic earnings per share, net cash flow from operating activities and the per share value.     

Mandatory Adoption of IASB Standards: Value Relevance and Country-Specific Factors

The objective of this study is to investigate if the value relevance of European-listed companies increased after the mandatory application of International Accounting Standards (IAS)/International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and how the value relevance of accounting information prepared under IAS/IFRS is shaped by the specific factors of the country in which companies are domiciled. Results show that the value relevance of financial information during the period companies applied mandatory IAS/IFRS is higher than for the period during which they applied local accounting standards. We also found that countries where accounting and tax are clearly separated show more relevant accounting information. Finally, we found that companies from countries with more legal and public enforcement mechanisms disclose less relevant accounting information under IAS/IFRS.     

IAS/IFRS in Belgium: Quantitative analysis of the impact on the tax burden of companies

The adoption of International Accounting Standards and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS/IFRS) in the European Union is part of the European Commission's global tax harmonisation policy whose aim is to establish a common (consolidated) corporate tax base. The paper shows that the impact of an IAS/IFRS-based tax accounting on the effective tax burden of Belgian companies is large and not uniform across sectors. Some sectors, like construction and automotive vehicles, experience much larger increases in effective tax burdens than others. Globally the impact is relatively important. The analysis is conducted using the European Tax Analyzer (ETA), a multi-period forward looking program. In a European context, an IAS/IFRS-based tax accounting will increase the effective corporate tax burdens in all selected countries. However, it will most probably maintain the current tax competitive positions of EU countries. The expected broadening of the tax base could constitute an opportunity to reduce the corporate income tax rate without changing the overall effective burden.     

LARGE ACCOUNTING FIRMS’ SURVEY REVEALS EMERGENCE OF “TWO STANDARD” SYSTEM IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is receiving great attention. In 2005, all listed companies domiciled in the European Union (EU) will be required to prepare consolidated accounts based on IFRS. Individual EU member states are, however, permitted to decide whether IFRS will be required or allowed for non-listed companies or for listed companies’ individual accounts. Based primarily on data collected by the six largest international accounting firms during their most recent convergence survey, this paper examines each of the 15 EU member states’ convergence plans and their perceived barriers to convergence.The findings indicate that most EU members do not plan to converge national GAAP with IFRS, thereby highlighting the great significance of the large firms’ concerns regarding emergence of a “two-standard” system in the EU. The survey indicates the majority of EU countries will continue to require or allow national GAAP for individual accounts. While Belgium is considering requiring IFRS for all consolidated accounts, other EU countries have decided to allow or are considering allowing non-listed companies to prepare IFRS consolidated accounts.In most EU countries, the link between financial accounting and tax accounting represents a major barrier to convergence. Other frequently cited barriers include disagreement with certain IFRS and the complicated nature of certain IFRS. International requirements for financial instruments are viewed as particularly problematic.     

我国新会计准则中公允价值的运用:意义与特征

我国新会计准则在诸多方面实现了突破,其中公允价值计量属性的运用可谓是最为引人注目的方面。本文认为,公允价值计量属性的运用,既是我国会计准则在国际趋同中迈出的实质性步伐,也标志着我国市场经济日趋成熟,这对充分发挥会计准则在资本市场中基础设施作用具有深远意义;同时,我国新会计准则在公允价值运用的方向、范围、程度等方面也表现出了若干重要特征。