电煤供应链合作伙伴有效竞合的进化博弈分析

利用进化博弈的双种群博弈理论,研究了电煤供应链中煤炭企业和电力企业两方的博弈演化过程及影响因素。研究表明,电煤供应链的演化方向受到政府监督有效与否的影响,其中对于政府的监督表现在供应链上是奖惩系数、风险发生概率等。除了政府监督之外还受到电煤供应链的合作成本、合作收益、收益分配系数、合作风险减少额、风险补偿系数等因素的影响。降低合作成本,提高合作收益,建立公平有效的利益分配机制、风险补偿机制和奖惩机制,将会加快电煤供应链有效竞合的实现。     

煤炭企业人力资源管理风险指标体系构建研究

在分析煤炭企业人力资源管理风险现状的基础上,研究了煤炭企业人力资源管理风险指标构建的流程,构建了煤炭企业人力资源管理风险指标体系,包括人员规划及岗位设置、人员招录与流失、员工培训及开发、绩效薪酬等,并提出完善人员招聘计划、制定科学公正的人才配置制度、制定科学的考核标准以及与之相匹配的薪酬管理制度、建立风险预警机制以及风险管理机制、增强企业员工的综合素质等规避人力资源管理风险的建议。     

企业单项无形资产的收益法评估

本文运用无形资产评估中最常用的收益现值法分别对企业的两类单项无形资产：技术类无形资产和市场类无形资产进行了理论和实证研究。对收益法评估中折现率的确定重新建立了数学模型，井提出了品牌价值评估的Interbrand方法。     

基于企业核心竞争力理论的无形资产经营问题研究

本文从回顾一个多世纪以来无形资产取得的研究成果入手 ,系统分析了无形资产经营与企业发展的关系 ,尤其是无形资产经营与提升企业核心竞争力的关系。文章认为 ,衡量企业核心竞争力大小的依据是无形资产的质与量 ;企业核心竞争力的强弱体现为创造和提升无形资产能力的大小 ,而提升企业核心竞争力的资产主要是无形资产。同时 ,通过企业核心竞争力对企业价值贡献的效应分析 ,提出了加强无形资产价值管理 ,培育、提升和评价企业核心竞争力的基本思路和评价方法 ,为进一步深化无形资产的研究提供了新的研究空间     

国内大型煤炭企业多元化程度与其经营绩效相关性研究

煤炭企业开展多元化经营是由其采掘行业的资源不可再生特性决定的,目前部分国内煤炭企业已经形成了自己的特色产业和可持续发展模式,文章针对国内大型煤炭企业,通过建立回归模型采用相关分析、回归分析,对多元化程度与煤炭企业的经营绩效相关性进行了定量研究。     

煤炭企业财务风险与内控优化

煤炭企业的财务风险是机制不完善、风险意识不高、资金往来体制不健全、融资方式单一、内部管理意识淡薄、缺乏内部监管的体现。为了避免问题的产生，煤炭企业要建立健全经营风险管理体系，完善企业风险意识，改善企业经营财务管理机制，减少经营投入，增强社会资本的运作功能，构筑抵御财务风险的壁垒。     

对我国煤炭企业盈与亏的两点思考（下）

对我国煤炭企业盈与亏的两点思考（下）煤炭部政策法规司潘伟尔二、＂减去级差收益＂是为各类煤炭企业生产经营创造公平竞争环境的先决条件，是科学考察煤炭企业盈亏的大前提。＂实施分类指导＂是充分发挥主观因素作用，解决经济体制过渡时期煤炭企业生产经营中新旧矛盾，...     

企业法律风险与防范探析

本文基于煤炭企业生产经营管理的特点,针对企业风险产生的表现形式及成因分析,论述了法律风险防范机制建立的重要性和必要性,阐明企业法律风险防范的方式和措施的特殊作用和现实意义。通过企业法律风险防范建设的不断探索和经验总结,力求促进企业法律风险防范意识的提高,加强企业法律风险防范体系和机制建设,从而保障企业生产经营各项活动的正常进行。     

内蒙古煤炭企业多元化经营与风险管理

近年来,内蒙古煤炭企业在面临市场竞争加剧、环境保护压力增大、产能过剩等多重困境时,为了实现企业发展与经济效益最大化,开始向多元化经营模式转型。然而,多元化经营与风险协同性质也就决定需要同时面对更多风险与挑战。如何科学、有效进行风险管理,降低风险,已成为内蒙古煤炭企业多元化经营发展的问题。本文旨在为煤炭企业提供风险管理理论和实践指导。     

浅析股东合作公司中人力资源管理对组织绩效的影响

通过对股东合作公司实例研究,分析了在此类公司中人力资源管理对组织绩效的影响.本文研究的人力资源管理办法主要由员工融合与晋升机制、奖励体系、参与公司管理活动、绩效管理四个主要因素组成；组织绩效由员工工作效率、经营绩效、公司收益三个主要因素组成.通过自身实践并通过结构方程验证了两者的关系.结果说明:员工融合与晋升机制对员工工作效率具有明确的正面影响趋势；奖励体系对经营绩效和公司收益具有明确的正面影响趋势;绩效管理对员工工作效率具有明确的正面影响趋势.     

Managing and reporting intangible assets in research technology organisations

In the last couple of years, new instruments and methods for measuring, valuing and managing different forms of intangible assets have been proposed. Firms started to implement comprehensive management techniques to identify and value different forms of intangible assets based on an integrative framework, incorporating different forms of intangible assets such as R&D and human capital. Research Technology Organisations (RTOs) present an interesting case for studying different forms of intangible assets, their interdependencies and their impact on outputs. The main business of these organisations is R&D; thus, nearly all forms of investments are related to the R&D process. Their outputs are knowledge-intensive products, services and public goods with the aim of improving the innovation output of their various customers. Some European RTOs have started to introduce new instruments for measuring and managing their intangible assets more explicitly. The paper investigates the general background, a specific model and empirical experiences of an Austrian RTO, which introduced an intellectual capital management system.     

无形资产的信息披露与市场检验——基于深圳创业板上市公司数据

本文以2011年5月18日之前成功上市的218家创业板上市公司作为研究对象,对广泛存在且不规则分布于招股说明书和年报中的与无形资产相关的信息进行了较为深入的挖掘和分析。一是对该类上市公司披露的信息进行了基于常规和非常规无形资产的统计分析,并指出无形资产信息披露困境源于相关学科尚未就同一现象形成共识。二是研究了各类无形资产与市净率和企业绩效的关系,发现我国创业板市场已初步具备发现和评价无形资产的功能。三是研究了政府补助、销售费用和研发费用对无形资产的影响。四是就提高创业板上市公司无形资产信息披露质量和促进该类企业实施无形资产优化战略提出了系列建议。     

上市公司国有资产价值流失分析

本文通过对资产概念的广义理解，界定了上市公司国有资产总价值及流失体系，然后从市场价值、安全价值、权力价值和无形价值等四个方面分别探讨了上市公司国有资产的价值流失问题。本文认为，造假、圈钱、内部人控制是当前严重的上市公司国有资产价值流失问题，上市公司国有资产的控制权、监督权、剩余索取权等权力的丧失，上市公司国有资产风险的增加，上市公司国有资产增值、保值机会的丧失以及无形资产价值的流失都是上市公司国有资产价值流失的表现形式。     

企业动漫角色商品化权收益影响因素的灰关联分析

本文通过文献研究、案例分析和实地调研,提出基于"动漫形象资产——动漫角色声誉——营销管理能力——制度环境友好性"的动漫企业角色商品化权收益的4要素分析模型。本文通过灰关联分析显示:对当期商品化权收入影响最大的是制度环境友好性,其次是营销管理能力、企业的动漫形象资产及动漫角色声誉;对后期商品化权收入影响最大的是动漫角色声誉,其次是制度环境友好性,企业的营销管理能力以及动漫形象资产。     

国有煤炭企业投资风险管理机制研究及对策

从煤炭企业投资风险管控制度建设的现状及存在的问题出发,分析了风险管控工作存在的各种风险源,并探讨了建立健全投资风险管控机构和制度体系、提升经营管理者和员工的投资风险管控意识、建设网络投资风险管控信息平台等控制对策,以期构建新的投资风险管控机制。     

经济增长驱动因素分析——基于无形资产投资视角

为了探讨无形资产对经济增长的贡献,本文从回顾经济增长理论的沿革历程入手,分析了不同发展阶段经济增长理论中无形资产对经济增长的贡献,指出无形资产已经成为经济增长的驱动因素。文章认为,新经济增长理论虽然论证了知识和科技进步等无形资产是经济增长的决定性因素,但是,为了充分地揭示无形资产的经济贡献,新经济增长理论在其框架结构及对驱动因素的分析方法等方面需要进一步地探索和修正。     

Status in a strange land? Context‐dependent value of status in cross‐border venture capital

Research Summary: While recent literature has depicted status as an intangible asset that is firm‐specific and mobile, we have a limited understanding of whether status confers advantage in a way similar to other intangible assets. This study examines the macro‐structural contingencies that influence the marginal value of firm status as firms expand to new markets. Building on the literatures on status and social approval assets, as well as globalization and international management, we hypothesize that two conditions influence how valuable home‐country status will be in a given host country: the interconnectedness of the home and host countries, and their relative position in the global network. We test our hypotheses in a study of 187 venture capital (VC)‐backed biotechnology ventures in 19 countries between 1990 and 2006. Managerial Summary: Startups typically prefer high‐status VC investors for endorsements, network connections, and resources. One might expect the benefits of high‐status VCs to be even higher when they invest across borders. Yet, we show that status is ingrained in context, and that the performance advantage of partnering with high‐status cross‐border VC firms depends on the relationship between the country of the VC firm and that of the startup. We find that, when the VC industries in the two countries are more connected, the positive effect of cross‐border VC firm status on successful exit is amplified. However, when the VC firm comes from a more central country than the startup, the benefits of VC firm status are less pronounced and vice versa.     

A framework, process and tool for managing technology‐based assets

Technology organisations centre their business on the development of new technology‐based offerings (i.e. products and services). The strategic management of technology‐based assets is therefore crucial for these organisations as an imperative for business success. However, these assets are often intangible and reflect future rather than current value and are therefore difficult to manage when using traditional managerial concepts. This study investigates integrative mechanisms addressing the management of technology‐based assets and offerings in a technology organisation. The approach taken was to study the views and practices regarding the management of technology‐based assets in a number of strategic units of a technology organisation (CSIR, South Africa). The study maintains that the management of technology‐based assets and offerings requires clear strategic management of the process of technological innovation with special emphasis on the management of the intellectual capital (IC) and the intellectual property (IP) of the organisation. The study describes a framework linking the core processes supporting the management of technology‐based assets and offerings with other organisational elements such as leadership, strategy, and culture. Specific key links between the core process of innovation and the strategic management of investment in technology‐based assets using a portfolio approach are discussed.     

Identification of intangible assets in knowledge‐based organizations using concept mapping techniques

This paper proposes a procedure for identifying the intangible assets that generate value to knowledge‐intensive organizations using concept mapping techniques. Concept mapping is a form of structured conceptualization that incorporates and processes the opinion of a set of experts. A double statistical treatment consisting of a multidimensional scaling analysis and a cluster analysis is applied to a set of data provided by experts to obtain the results, which are presented in the form of maps. As a case study, the social and legal departments in a Spanish university were analyzed. As a result, 60 items referring to different intangible assets of these departments were identified and grouped into 10 clusters, and they were in turn grouped in regions corresponding to the three basic components of intellectual capital: human capital, structural capital and relational capital. The evaluation of the relative importance of each of them leads to the preeminent position of the structural capital.