战区装备保障点选址决策分析

科学合理的装备保障点选址决策可以使战区装备保障能力得到最大发挥。在分析战区装备保障点选址问题特点和选址决策影响因素的基础上,给出了战区装备保障点选址的基本原则;详细分析设计了战区装备保障点选址问题的流程和步骤;并研究了战区装备保障点选址的一般方法。研究对于提高战区装备保障能力,有着重要的理论和现实意义。     

设施选址方法研究

在查阅大量文献的基础上,整理提炼了22种常用的设施选址方法,并依据各方法的特点,选取4种分类标准对其进行了分类研究,剖析了各方法的优、缺点,并总结各方法的适用范围,从而使选址方法更加系统化,为设施选址方法的选择以及实际选址决策提供科学的理论依据和实际指导。     

城市应急服务设施选址规划模型研究

在分析应急选址的研究背景及意义的基础上,总结了国内外关于城市应急资源优化配置模型的研究,并提出了典型的应急设施选址方法,最后对设施选址方法进行适用性的比较,为解决城市重大自然灾害应急服务设施优化配置的问题提供了思路。     

基于两阶段选址法的单点区域型配送中心选址研究

以单点区域型配送中心选址为研究对象,以系统理论、组合理论等为基础,运用定量、定性方法对区域型配送中心选址进行研究,提出了新的选址方法——两阶段单点选址法。借助Matlab等软件的强大功能,进行计算求解,并通过实例验证了该方法的有效性。     

基于微粒群优化算法的物流配送中心选址问题研究

结合物流配送中心选址的特点，建立数学模型．在此基础上研究了基于微粒群算法的物流多配送中心选址问题，得到一种新的多配送中心选址方法。仿真结果证明此方法比传统选址方法更适合多配送中心选址和非线性问题的优化，并且具有传统算法所不具备的灵活性，适用多样的物流配送模型。     

物流中心选址的影响因素分析及案例

运用现代物流及城市规划原理，对物流中心选址的原则及影响因素进行系统的分析研究，并在此基础上提出了物流中心选址的方法及注意事项。最后用“廊坊国际物流中心选址”案例对选址方法进行验证。     

基于重心法与物流量预测的物流园区选址

在研究物流园区选址理论的基础上,为使物流运输成本最小和物流园区的建设符合长远发展,在对物流园区选址时使用理论中的重心法并建立相应选址数学模型,将数学模型与趋势外推预测法预测的物流园区物流量结合,在定量的基础上计算得到物流园区的选址位置,同时为精确地得到选址位置开发了基于重心法的选址模型软件。最后通过吉木乃县物流园区选址说明该方法的可行性。     

我国物流园区布局规划研究

重点研究了物流园区的数量确定和宏观空间布局规划方法,在物流园区的数量和选址方法研究中,分别建立了单个及多个物流园区的选址模型,并且对模型进行算法的实证研究,最后提出相关建议。     

我国物流园区布局规划研究

重点研究了物流园区的数量确定和宏观空间布局规划方法,在物流园区的数量和选址方法研究中,分别建立了单个及多个物流园区的选址模型,并且对模型进行算法的实证研究,最后提出相关建议.     

基于重心法与物流量预测的物流园区选址

在研究物流园区选址理论的基础上,为使物流运输成本最小和物流园区的建设符合长远发展,在对物流园区选址时使用理论中的重心法并建立相应选址数学模型,将数学模型与趋势外推预测法预测的物流园区物流量结合,在定量的基础上计算得到物流园区的选址位置,同时为精确地得到选址位置开发了基于重心法的选址模型软件.最后通过吉木乃县物流园区选址说明该方法的可行性.     

论会计系统研究方法

系统研究方法源于系统科学的发展。系统研究需要采用系统研究方法,系统研究方法在会计研究中的应用形成会计系统研究方法。会计系统研究方法是一个体系,包括各种具体研究方法,具有从整体出发,进行"综合-分析-再综合",确定目标与实现目标相结合,定量分析与定性分析相结合等特点。会计研究的内容形成被研究的系统,在会计领域的各个方面都可以采用会计系统研究方法。会计研究采用系统研究方法,有利于全面认识系统的性质及其发展,正确处理系统各构成部分之间的相互关系,促进系统目标的实现,开拓系统的创新发展,检验系统研究的成果。     

Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions

Mixed methods research is becoming an increasingly popular approach in several fields. However, its application in the field of entrepreneurship has not been studied. The authors reviewed the use of mixed methods research in three entrepreneurship journals and two leading generalistic journals that publish entrepreneurship research, examining the main purposes and designs. A total of 955 articles were reviewed and 81 mixed methods studies were identified. The analysis of these articles revealed opportunities associated with the application of this approach. Mixed methods may help to improve entrepreneurship research addressing challenges emphasized in earlier studies. Suggestions on why and how to use mixed methods research are offered, and recommendations are provided to guide future mixed methods studies to advance our understanding of the entrepreneurial phenomenon.     

物流配送问题的研究文献统计与综述

针对2000-2008年关于物流配送问题的研究文献进行梳理和分析,按研究内容分为物流配送中心选址、系统内部作业与管理、专业市场物流配送模式、配送中心布局与建设、基于电子商务的物流配送、物流配送路径优化和物流配送车辆调度等七类,按研究方法分为运筹学方法、仿真技术、评价方法、单一遗传算法、遗传算法与其它方法结合、其它启发式算法、其它定量方法、现状分析与对策建议等八类,根据各类的研究统计,提出进一步研究的方向。     

论案例研究法与实证研究法的结合

案例研究法和实证研究法是管理研究领域中常用的研究方法,两种方法各有利弊,将其恰当地结合使用可以使研究结果更加科学可信。本文对这两种研究方法进行了深入细致的分析比较,引用了目前国际一流的学术期刊等刊登的经典研究论文,通过对其研究方法的分析进一步说明案例研究法与实证研究法结合开展研究的过程、结论和重要性,作者提出了在研究中将案例研究法与实证研究法结合使用的三种方法。     

A typology of mixed methods research designs

The mixed methods paradigm is still in its adolescence, and, thus, is still relatively unknown and confusing to many researchers. In general, mixed methods research represents research that involves collecting, analyzing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data in a single study or in a series of studies that investigate the same underlying phenomenon. Over the last several years, a plethora of research designs have been developed. However, the number of designs that currently prevail leaves the doctoral student, the beginning researcher, and even the experienced researcher who is new to the field of mixed methods research with the challenge of selecting optimal mixed methods designs. This paper presents a three-dimensional typology of mixed methods designs that represents an attempt to rise to the challenge of creating an integrated typology of mixed methods designs. An example for each design is included as well as a notation system that fits our eight-design framework. This paper won the James E. McLean outstanding paper award.     

论教育社会学研究方法体系的构成

教育社会学方法体系由教育社会学方法论系统和教育社会学具体方法系统组成。教育社会学方法论系统包括哲学方法论、社会科学一般方法论和教育社会学学科方法论三个层次;教育社会学具体方法系统包括理论研究方法、实践研究方法和文献研究方法。     

The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences

Mixed methods research involves the combined use of quantitative and qualitative methods in the same research study, and it is becoming increasingly important in several scientific areas. The aim of this paper is to review and compare through a mixed methods multiple-case study the application of this methodology in three reputable behavioural science journals: the Journal of Organizational Behavior, Addictive Behaviors and Psicothema. A quantitative analysis was carried out to review all the papers published in these journals during the period 2003–2008 and classify them into two blocks: theoretical and empirical, with the latter being further subdivided into three subtypes (quantitative, qualitative and mixed). A qualitative analysis determined the main characteristics of the mixed methods studies identified, in order to describe in more detail the ways in which the two methods are combined based on their purpose, priority, implementation and research design. From the journals selected, a total of 1,958 articles were analysed, the majority of which corresponded to empirical studies, with only a small number referring to research that used mixed methods. Nonetheless, mixed methods research does appear in all the behavioural science journals studied within the period selected, showing a range of designs, where the sequential equal weight mixed methods research design seems to stand out.     

审计风险研究综述

从研究范式与研究方法来看,审计风险研究主要分为三类:(1)在审计学与管理学的逻辑框架内采用理论演绎法或规范研究讨论审计目标、审计环境、审计责任、审计方法与审计风险之间的关系;(2)以实验研究与实地研究的方法在审计学、心理学、行为科学与社会学的逻辑框架内,分析审计风险的影响因素与控制方法;(3)用经验研究的方法在法与经济学的逻辑框架内,讨论制度环境、审计风险与审计市场结构之间的关系。以往国内审计风险的研究主要采用规范研究较多,实验研究、实地研究以及经验研究相对欠缺。     

Mixed Methods Studies in Environmental Management Research: Prevalence,Purposes and Designs

Mixed methods research, that is, the combined use of quantitative and qualitative methods in the same study, is a popular approach in several fields. However, its use in the field of environmental management and sustainable development has not been examined. The authors review the application of mixed methods research in the journal Business Strategy and the Environment in the last ten years. A total of 340 articles have been read and reviewed, and 26 mixed methods studies have been identified. The main purposes and mixed methods designs are examined. Suggestions on why and how to use mixed methods research are offered, and recommendations are provided to guide future mixed methods studies to advance our understanding of environmental management topics. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment