基于知识管理的企业文化创新

企业文化是影响企业知识管理实施的关键要素,因此,企业要实施知识管理必须同时进行相应的企业文化创新。本文作者主要从企业文化对知识管理的影响,知识管理条件下企业文化的特征以及如何进行企业文化创新三个方面进行了探讨。     

浅析知识管理下的企业文化创新

本文首先简要论述知识管理与企业文化基本内涵。接着分析影响知识管理实施的企业文化因素,最后阐明企业顺利实施知识管理必须进行相应的企业文化创新。     

浅谈知识管理与企业管理文化创新

本文对知识管理与企业管理创新进行了全面论述,分析了知识管理就是对知识资源进行有效管理的过程,其目标是使企业实现显性知识和隐性知识的共享,促进知识创新并最大限度地开发石化企业员工的智力资源,更好地为争创一流企业服务。     

基于知识管理的企业管理创新

利用组织内外的知识资产开展一系列有利于知识创新的知识活动,以此运用集体智慧来提高整体应变和创新能力的知识管理,成为企业管理的新境界。企业管理者必须把握管理创新的发展趋势和新要求,不断进行观念创新、组织创新、战略创新、制度创新、模式创新、文化创新和技术创新,使企业管理创新成为企业适应知识经济时代的真正向导。     

基于知识管理的企业管理创新探讨

随着社会经济的迅速发展,企业的竞争也越来越激烈。企业要在竞争中取得领先的优势,那么就必须对企业的经营管理加以创新,改变传统的管理模式,进行观念、文化、管理方式等创新,使企业经营管理创新成为企业的核心竞争力量,不断适应知识经济的时代需求。本文以企业知识管理为切入点,着重分析研究基于知识管理的企业管理创新方案。     

基于知识管理的现代企业创新研究

随着人力资源成本的不断提升,能源的不断减少和我国关于建设创新性国家的政策,企业核心竞争里越来越多的表现为创新能力的高低.本文分析了企业创新的基础即知识管理的平台和知识创新的过程.     

知识管理理念下的企业管理创新探究

使用那些组织内外的知识资产搞些有益创新的知识活动,能运用人们智慧来提高整体应变和创新能力的知识管理,已经变成企业管理新的境界。企业经营管理人须掌控管理创新的发展倾向与新要求,持续来意识创新、管理创新、策略创新、制度创新、方式创新、文化创新与技术创新,让企业管理创新作为企业符合知识经济时期的真正方向。     

企业文化创新对企业管理创新的影响力

创新是一个企业不断的向前发展的一个重要原因,一个不断在创新的企业才会有更多的新鲜血液注入其中,才会紧紧跟随着时代前进的步伐,不被社会所淘汰。一个不断进行创新的企业才会被社会所接受,才能在激烈竞争的市场之中获得一席之地。     

试论企业文化与企业知识创新功效的提升

企业知识创新功效就是企业实施知识创新活动之后产生的预期效果,企业文化是企业价值观念以及行为准则的总和。企业知识创新与企业文化有着必然的内在联系。本文主要分析了企业知识创新的作用与功效,结合企业文化对提升企业知识创新功效的重要性分析,最后提出了基于企业知识创新功效提升的企业文化建设路径。     

新经济时代企业管理之创新

在新的世纪之中，企业的管理面临着知识经济的严峻挑战，同时伴随着全新的发展过程，只要科技界、理论界、企业界共同努力，不失时机地进行管理创新，一种全新的管理将同知识经济到来一样，从传统管理向知识管理迈进。２１世纪企业管理必然是一种知识型的管理。     

The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries

In the resource-based view approach, the knowledge frontier rests on the understanding of the process of creating and recreating distinctive competences. Moreover, in spite of the importance of knowledge assets, how innovation distinctive competences are generated in organizations is still an unknown factor. This research studies the effect of introducing knowledge management programs in the development of innovation distinctive competences, using two knowledge intensive industries. We establish a conceptual delimitation of knowledge management as a directive system through a set of principles and practices. The theoretical relationships we propose are tested in an empirical study carried out in 222 firms from the Spanish biotechnology and telecommunications industries.      

The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance

Research on industrial clusters mostly focuses on the effects of the competitive advantage they generate. This study takes a different approach, conducting empirical research on three types of Taiwanese parks (export processing zones, industrial zones, and science parks), in which economic development is particularly prominent, and which have industry cluster characteristics. The study explores the effects of special resources and relationships among cluster firms on innovation performance, and focuses on knowledge management as the mediator for investigation. A survey, regression analysis, and correlation analysis probe into the effects of the special resources and relationships among industrial clusters on corporate knowledge management and innovation performance. Knowledge management emerges as the mediator of industry clusters in terms of corporate innovation performance, thus providing support for the research hypotheses. The findings of this study are valuable for further research and strategic thinking on the sustainability of corporate operations.     

Corporate culture and absorptive capacity: The moderating role of national culture dimensions on innovation management

Firms have to strive for innovation constantly in order to gain and retain a competitive advantage, which renders absorptive capacity (ACAP) – a firm’s ability to absorb and apply external knowledge – highly relevant. Based on data obtained from 592 CEOs and managers of firms in Austria, Brazil, Germany, India, Singapore, and the United States, we show how ACAP can be fostered in an international context. We analyze how corporate culture affects potential as well as realized ACAP and how national culture dimensions moderate these relationships in a fit-as-moderation model. We reveal that the adhocracy culture supports potential and realized ACAP, whereas the market and hierarchy cultures hinder both potential and realized ACAP. Moreover, the relationship between corporate culture and potential ACAP is stable across national culture dimensions, whereas selected national and corporate cultures are more effective in fostering realized ACAP. These results open up opportunities for researchers and support firms in their attempts to foster their firms’ knowledge management processes.     

Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management

Practices of knowledge management are context-specific and they can influence organizational effectiveness. This study examines the possible mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness. A survey was conducted of 301 organizations. The results suggest that knowledge management fully mediates the impact of organizational culture on organizational effectiveness, and partially mediates the impact of organizational structure and strategy on organizational effectiveness. The findings carry theoretical implications for knowledge management literature as they extend the scope of research on knowledge management from examining a set of independent management practices to examining a system-wide mechanism that connects internal resources and competitive advantage.     

A strategic risk approach to knowledge management

In today's business environment, strong forces of competition and globalization have created an urgency to focus how an organization controls and nurtures its intellectual capital. The concept of knowledge and its management has gained currency and momentum as technology has enabled thoughts and ideas to be more easily generated and distributed. With increased application of technologies such as the Internet, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), and advanced software capabilities, it has been suggested the time has come for discussion of a new paradigm for knowledge management. Toward that end, this article examines the knowledge literature and reviews the experience of a leading private healthcare group, with the objective of gaining a better understanding of the issues that confront effective knowledge management in contemporary organizations. Finally, a tentative knowledge process model is developed herein, one which is intended to guide future discussion in the ongoing knowledge debate.     

Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity

This study examines the role of knowledge management capacity in the relationship between strategic human resource practices and innovation performance from the knowledge-based view. This study uses regression analysis to test the hypotheses in a sample of 146 firms. The results indicate that strategic human resource practices are positively related to knowledge management capacity which, in turn, has a positive effect on innovation performance. The findings provide evidence that knowledge management capacity plays a mediating role between strategic human resource practices and innovation performance. Finally, this study discusses managerial implications and highlights future research directions.     

Questions asked about enterprise risk management by risk practitioners

Enterprise risk management (ERM) was introduced in the 1990s and has become an indicator of good management. Despite this success, many organizations still seek practical advice on ERM implementation. This article provides questions asked of an experienced chief risk officer and his staff by risk practitioners at many organizations over 11 years. Detailed answers based on best practices are provided. This article is important as it shows what areas were of concern related to ERM implementation, and many of these concerns may still apply today. The questions presented in this article fall in the following 10 areas of ERM implementation: background and context, organizational, getting started, risk identification, culture and engagement, risk criteria (which includes risk appetite and risk tolerances), tools and techniques, reporting, the benefits, and the future of ERM. This article should be of interest to practitioners involved with ERM, consultants in the area of ERM, and academics teaching courses on ERM, risk management, and related topics. This article will also provide a base against which further future research can be done to see how ERM evolves.     

The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management

Enterprise risk management (ERM) began to take root in the late 1990s and has since become generally recognized as an expectation of good management and corporate governance. However, as evidenced by surveys and research, many companies still struggle with ERM implementation. This article explores the challenges companies face when implementing ERM and offers solutions for firms struggling with the concepts and execution. We draw upon Hydro One's experience in achieving ERM maturity as a best practice case study. The company's ERM methods have been researched and documented extensively. With over 15 years of ERM success, Hydro One is an excellent organization to benchmark for ERM best practices.     

Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity,voice, and knowledge sharing

Innovation—the implementation of creative ideas—is one of the most important factors of competitive advantage in 21^st century organizations. Yet, leaders do not always encourage employee behaviors that are critical for innovation. We integrate existing literature on the critical factors that serve as antecedents of innovation, including employee voice and knowledge sharing, which in turn lead to creativity and innovation. Based on existing empirical research, we offer evidence-based recommendations for managers to become innovation leaders by: (1) developing the right group norms, (2) designing teams strategically, (3) managing interactions with those outside the team, (4) showing support as a leader, (5) displaying organizational support, and (6) using performance management effectively.