Effets des réglementations sur la rentabilité et le risque des compagnies d'assurances iard

La réglementation des sociétés d'assurances par les autorités de tutelle impose différentes contraintes aux gestionnaires. Il est difficile d'en apprécier les effets finaux si l'on ne dispose pas d'un modèle d'ensemble de l'entreprise. La rentabilité des compagnies d'assurances dépend de la gestion de l'actif et du passif du bilan, portefeuille déplacements et portefeuille d'assurances. La réglementation intervient pour poser des limites à ces choix sous forme de plafonds en pourcentages pour certains types de placements. Cette étude dans le contexte Canadien met en évidence le coǔt économique, en termes de risque et de rendement, d'une réglementation sur les placements. Abstract The control of insurance companies by the regulatory authorities imposes constraints on the manager's decisions. The companies' profitability is a function of the management of both assets and liabilities. Therefore it depends on the relative importance of the diverse lines of insurance - the insurance portfolio - and relative weight of the various assets - the investment portfolio. Portfolio theory demonstrates that the total risk is a non-linear combination of those component risks in a portfolio. This, in turn, determines the pursuit of the optimal portfolio structure, a structure defined by a minimal risk for a given level of profitability. With such a generalized portfolio model for insurance companies, one could simulate the consequences of the modification of any given regulation on either the assets or liabilities. The combination of risk level and profitability accessible to the companies vary as a function of markets constraints and regulations considered. It is therefore possible to demonstrate the effect, in terms of risk and return framework, of various regulations. The first section of this paper discusses the appropriate approach to the portfolio problem applied to insurance. The second section describes the data and the empirical results.     

L'effet des récompenses sur l'état de santé psychologique des travailleurs: les mécanismes sous‐jacents

The effort‐reward imbalance (ERI) model in the workplace (Siegrist, 1996 ) suggests that inequity of rewards contributes to a degradation of mental health through a process of devaluation. The objective of our study is to test this hypothesis empirically. Data were collected from 659 agents in three call centres located in the province of Quebec. A bootstrap mediation test show that perceived inequity with respect to rewards (recognition, promotion, job security) affects the level of psychological distress through the perception of being valued by the organization. Perceived inequity affects mental health because it signals to workers the extent to which they are valued by their organization. Our correlational study provides evidence of the internal validity of the ERI model. Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effets des conceptions de l'erreur,de la motivation à apprendre et du soutien social sur l'intention de transférer les nouveaux apprentissages : un modèle de médiation modérée

This study aims to assess whether trainees' errors orientation can influence their motivation to learn and their intention to transfer learning. Data were collected from 275 trainees participating in a corporate training program offered by a Canadian government agency. Results show that the concept of learning by error positively influences trainees' levels of motivation and their intention to transfer learning. Results also confirm the mediating role motivation plays between the concept of learning by error and the intention of transferring learning. Finally, results confirm the moderating role of social support on the relationship between motivation to learn and the intention to transfer learning. Practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed. Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.