国有股减持方式的创新思考

我国证券市场机制不完善 ,功能不健全的一个重要原因在于巨额非流动性国有股的存在 ,减持国有股 ,实现国有股流通已成为当务之急。目前国有股减持方式主要有回购、配售、协议转让、存量发行四种 ,但这些方式都存在着不足之处。在减持国有股过程中 ,设立“国有股减持运作基金” ,才有可能避免失误     

国有股减持方式探讨

截止到目前，我国已采用过的国有股减持方式有配售、回购、发行新股时存量减持和增发新股时存量减持、协议转让和拍卖。国有股减持还可采用指数基金、指数存托凭证、转换债券、备兑认股权下、缩股、认股证等创新方式。一个企业可以选择一种方式，也可以多种方式一起使用，可视企业具有情况而定。     

国有股减持问题讨论综述

《经济管理》特约评论员认为,减持国有股意义重大。(1)它是政府利用国有股调控经济的重要政策手段。(2)增强了国有资产存量的流动性。同时也是国有资本退出相关产业或调整所有权结构的重要方式。(3)为公众流通股、法人股、国有股走向统一奠定了基础。减持国有股是中国证券市场规范、健康发展的必由之路。(4)真正实现了国有控股企业股权多元化的功能,形成规范的法人治理结构。[1]陈淮认为,减持国有股这一举措力图要解决的是国民经济发展与改革过程中的四个重大难题。第一,通过国有资产变现补充社会保障基金。第二,推进国有企业改革。     

国有股减持新思路

在我国证券市场上,国家股、国有法人股占上市公司总股本比重约2/3.这种股权结构不利于上市公司建立规范的公司治理结构,国有股需要进行减持,但即使是存量调整,资本市场也无法承受.国有股减持新思路可以有效解决资本市场容量不足这一过去国有股方案所无法克服的障碍.同时,有利于规范上市公司的法人治理结构,从而使现代企业制度事半功倍.     

国有投资主体交互减持:国有股减持新思路

国有股减持是我国国企改革面临的一大问题。面对目前提出的众多方案都是围绕减持价格、减持对象、减持规模等技术层面的问题展开的,难以解决减持必然碰到的资金承接问题,这也是众多方案均未能成功实现减持的关键。该文提出一种新的国有股减持方案:即通过国有投资主体交互减持的途径,以解决国有股减持与承接资金不足的矛盾。     

中国经济提示

国务院发布《减持国有股筹集社会保障资金管理暂行办法》 《办法》明确规定,国有股减持主要采取国有股存量发行的方式。凡国家拥有股份的股份有限公司(包括境外上市的公司)向公共投资者首次发行和增发     

国有股减持方式的比较及选择

实施上市公司国有股减持将有利于我国股市的发展和国企改革的深化 ,而选择合适的减持国有股方式则是问题的关键。文章通过对几种主要国有股减持方式进行分析比较 ,提出了针对各种实际情况所应采取的不同减持方式。     

国有股的流通与减持需要市场化的定价方式

比较当前各种国有股减持方案,国有股全流通再逐步减持的思路对一次性解决国有股与法人股的流动性问题,完善上市公司治理结构是最为切实可行的.但这一方法尚为妥善解决的问题就是国有股应按照什么样的价格和流通股并轨,几次国有股减持的试点最终都因定价的不合理以失败告终,目前以净资产为基础的国有股定价方式存在很大弊端,至此,我们提出国有股流通与减持定价的具体方案,主要运用市盈率定价的方法,目的是使市场具备投资价值,同时通过增配股份对原流通股东的补偿确保建立一个利益均衡机制,最终实现国有股在稳定的市场环境下通过市场供求形成的价格进行减持.     

国有上市公司股权制度的演进

国有股减持是跟两个紧密关联的问题联系在一起的：一是股权结构问题，即持股者的身份构成和股权集中度问题；一是股权的流通性问题。我们将之笼统地称为股权的制度安排，国有股减持说到底就是上市公司股权制度的变迁，因此，可以用制度变迁的理论来闸释国有股减持问题。本文认为，我国上市公司现有股权制度安排源于经济改革中的路径依赖；从制度均衡的角度看，这种制度安排是非均衡的，因而，变迁是必然的；由于利益摩擦、国家有限理性以及制度变迁的时滞等问题，制度均衡的实现并不是一件很容易的事情。     

国有股减持的系统思考

国有股减持是当前国有企业改革实践和理论研究的重点,热点问题之一,本旨在对国有股减持的基本问题作一系统分析,并提出个人一些见解,以期有助于国有股减持工作的开展。     

John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Justice

John Stuart Mill has traditionally been portrayed as self-contradictory and failing to construct a unified social theory. Recent scholarship, however, has challenged this view, finding Mill's work to be creatively synthetic in bridging the antinomies inherent in liberal democratic thought. This revisionist interpretation of Mill is advanced by an understanding of his theory of justice and its role in shaping his policy positions on issues such as welfare, education, voting rights, property rights, taxation, government intervention, and the future of capitalism.     

A Rich Vein for “Reality Mining”北大核心CSSCISSCI

Arik Hesseldahl In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, U.S. officials quickly turned their attention to other potential targets, including California's Golden Gate Bridge. What would happen if terrorists took down the bridge between San Francisco and Marin County? How much of the region would be affected and for how long?     

John Stuart Mill's Theories of Wealth and Income Distribution

Although he was much influenced by David Ricardo when he wrote the classical part of his Principles , John Stuart Mill was not a Ricardian when he penned his theories of wealth and distribution. They are based on a triple foundation. First, a belief that economics is a moral discipline. Second a theory of custom-driven human behavior. Third, an empirically formed conviction that the institutions of state, education and business cooperate to structure the distribution of income. On the basis of these presuppositions, Mill formulated 1) an institutional theory of the formation of human and non-human wealth and 2) an even more institutional theory of distribution demonstrating how the aforementioned institutions malignantly skew the distribution of income to the advantage of the propertied classes and to the extreme disadvantage of the working class. As a social economist, Mill recommended institutional reforms designed to eradicate the poverty of the working class.     

中国养活自己能力的长期预测:技术和政策分析

中国拥有世界五分之一强的人口 ,收入又在迅速增长。因此 ,国际上很自然地会考虑或推测她在今后的几十年是否有能力养活自己。中国的人口预计将从 2 0 0 0年的 1 2 8亿增长到 2 0 2 0年的 1 4 6亿 ,和 2 0 3 0年的 1 4 9亿。与此同时 ,人均收入的增长将导致对家畜和鱼类产品更大的需求 ,因而对饲料的需求也将有很大的增长     

Toward a Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Organizational Life

Synopsis Classification is an important activity that facilitates theory development in many academic disciplines. Scholars in fields such as organizational science, management science and economics and have long recognized that classification offers an approach for ordering and understanding the diversity of organizational taxa (groups of one or more similar organizational entities). However, even the most prominent organizational classifications have limited utility, as they tend to be shaped by a specific research bias, inadequate units of analysis and a standard neoclassical economic view that does not naturally accommodate the disequilibrium dynamics of modern competition. The result is a relatively large number of individual and unconnected organizational classifications, which tend to ignore the processes of change responsible for organizational diversity. Collectively they fail to provide any sort of universal system for ordering, compiling and presenting knowledge on organizational diversity. This paper has two purposes. First, it reviews the general status of the major theoretical approaches to biological and organizational classification and compares the methods and resulting classifications derived from each approach. Definitions of key terms and a discussion on the three principal schools of biological classification (evolutionary systematics, phenetics and cladistics) are included in this review. Second, this paper aims to encourage critical thinking and debate about the use of the cladistic classification approach for inferring and representing the historical relationships underpinning organizational diversity. This involves examining the feasibility of applying the logic of common ancestry to populations of organizations. Consequently, this paper is exploratory and preparatory in style, with illustrations and assertions concerning the study and classification of organizational diversity.     

Information infrastructure: Who builds broadband networks?

This paper examines the essential difference between the U.S. and Japan, when one considers information infrastructure. There are seven perception gaps between the U.S. and Japan concerning Information Infrastructure policies. These gaps must be understood in order to compare the countries' governmental policies in this area. In looking at the present circumstances, the essential question to answer concerns who is to build, own and operate the network(s) of the infrastructure. Liberalization is certain to be a central factor in the ongoing telecommunications debates. Now that customers have had a taste of the liberalized market-place, the movement toward more open markets will be difficult to stop. When considering options, it is necessary to pay close attention to standardized network access and the increasingly important role software plays. These issues are causing us to take a new approach to the traditional role played by regulators. They also force a closer look at the appropriate structure of utility companies. This paper addresses the above issues in hopes of stimulating dialog on the new telecommunications infrastructure paradigm.     

Nonlinearity in Stock Exchange Markets: The Case of Bist 100 Indices

In this paper,using data for the Bist 100 index,we investigate the presence of nonlinearities by employing several nonlinearity tests.The Brock,Dechert,and Sche...     

Solidified Branding Function: How the Urban Brand Affects a Small Town’s Development? Case Study of Wangqingtuo,Tianjin, China

Chinese small towns are usually developed with single core industry,and the urban brand is the identity of a town that formed with the development of its indust...     

海岛地区产业演替及资源基础分析--以舟山群岛为例

改革开放以来,舟山市产业构成发生了显著变化,其经济发展过程可以划分为三个阶段。1992年前,是以产业结构渔业占绝对地位的单一结构阶段;1993—1998年,以旅游业为主的第三产业快速发展阶段;上世纪末以来,又进入了新一轮的经济发展时期,即工业产值比重快速增加阶段。根据海岛的自然资源基础和特点,在新世纪的经济发展过程中,舟山市应定位为生态型的港口旅游城市。以港口及临港工业为主导,以海岛旅游和海洋经济为特色,大力发展第二产业和第三产业。海岛地区的主导产业应体现海岛资源优势及区位优势,以集群性环保型产业为主。同时由于海岛地区淡水资源缺乏,主导产业也应着重选择低耗水型产业。