共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
汪伟海 《世界贸易组织动态与研究》2008,(4):1-10
作为WTO成立后举行的首轮多边贸易谈判,多哈回合谈判一开始就一波三折,尤其是农业谈判更是困难,其中的棉花问题更是关键之所在。本文首先评述了乌拉圭回合中的农业谈判主要成员的立场,并阐述了其谈判成果。其次,以美欧为例分析了乌拉圭回合后的棉花问题执行情况。最后从谈判的起因、谈判的进程、《农业框架协议》和农业减让模式等四个方面阐述多哈回合中的棉花问题谈判。 相似文献
7.
8.
Networks are important to entrepreneurial success. However, most research in this area to date has merely addressed the what; namely, what types of networks enable success. We seek to extend this stream of research by answering the how and the why. In so doing, we elaborate on how entrepreneurs can develop their networks, arguing that in order to create new organizations, nascent entrepreneurs must acquire resources from an increasingly diverse set of relatively stronger and weaker ties throughout the emergence phase. We then hypothesize why this evolutionary path is effective across the various dimensions of tie strength. Analyzing data from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics I (PSED I) with multilevel random coefficient growth curve modeling, we find strong support for our hypotheses. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for both academics and practitioners. 相似文献
9.
Agriculture looms large on the WTO's agenda. It was the first substantive item listed in the work programme of the Ministerial Declaration launching the Doha Round, and it was arguably at the centre of the failure at Cancun. Developing countries made it clear both before and during the Cancun meeting that progress on agriculture was their primary objective. Negotiations in other areas have received less attention and progressed more slowly. This paper considers that prioritisation, and suggests that the interests of developing countries in the current round of trade negotiations are much broader than is suggested by the narrow range of agricultural issues that have dominated negotiations. A true development round would require a significant reprioritisation of many areas of the WTO's current agenda. 相似文献
10.
Georg Koopmann Senior Economist Department World Economy
Hamburg Institute of International Economics Germany 《Intereconomics》2005,40(4):235-240
The Doha round got back on track in the summer of 2004. Where does it stand today? Has market access policy gained predominance over market regulation policy? Is the promotion of economic and social development becoming the “mainstream” of negotiations? What role does trade facilitation in developing countries play in this context? Is multilateral liberalisation compatible with the regional and bilateral opening of markets? Is further institutional reform of the WTO beyond the Doha agenda necessary? If so, what form could this take?*This article is based on a contribution made by the author to the International Policy Dialogue “Doha Development Round: Status and Prospects for Success” organised by the InWEnt gGmbH’s Development Policy Forum (Entwicklungspolitisches Forum, EF) in Berlin on 7/8 June 2005. 相似文献