基于层次分析法的A零售企业供应商选择优化研究

以A零售企业为例,分析市场零售企业供应商选择存在的普遍现状问题,重建供应商选择流程,优化供应商选择评价指标及方法;采用层次分析法进行供应商初选和供应商综合选择,确定企业的主要和备选供应商,从而建立有效可行的零售企业供应商选择模式。     

VMI环境下供应商的选择与评价研究

从产品、组织、信息三大方面构建了VMI供应商选择评价的指标体系,最后结合某企业VMI供应商选择实例,将模糊层次分析法(FAHP)应用在VMI供应商选择中,从总体上构建了企业供应商选择较为完整的框架。     

VMI环境下供应商的选择与评价研究

从产品、组织、信息三大方面构建了VMI供应商选择评价的指标体系,最后结合某企业VMI供应商选择实例,将模糊层次分析法( FA HP)应用在VMI供应商选择中,从总体上构建了企业供应商选择较为完整的框架.     

采购管理中供应商选择问题的研究

供应商对于一个企业的竞争力有着深远的影响，供应商的选择直接关系到企业的采购质量。因此研究供应商选择方法，具有重要的理论意义和实践意义。本文对供应商选择问题进行了研究，并用层次分析法(AHP)给出了一个具体的实例。     

制造企业中的供应商管理

现代企业中的供应商管理有一个明显特征是将供应商视为供应链中的重要一环,企业对供应商管理水平的高低在相当程度上决定企业的成功与失败。制造企业产品中材料约占MLO材料(Material)、人工(Labor)和日常管理费用(Overhead)的60%-80%,占产品售价的50%-70%,供应商所供材料品质的好坏、货期的及时性,价格的高低都会直接影响生产企业的产品定位、售价及客户满意度。所以如何管理供应商是现代企业不断探究的课题。本文就笔者20多年在跨国企业中的经验着重阐述现代企业中的供应商管理,希望对企业中的管理者有所裨益。     

分析企业采购管理中供应商的选择和评价策略

企业的采购管理主要分为两种模式,一种是传统管理模式,一种是准时制管理模式.在企业的采购行为中,企业对于供应商的评价非常重要.这直接关系到与供应商的合作与否.在评价过程中,企业经常利用层次分析法进行评价.通过将不同的问题分为不同的层次,不仅可以实现企业对于供应商的客观评价,还能促进供应商对自我的反思.因此,层次分析法不仅考虑了客观因素,同时也对主观因素进行了分析评价,非常有助于企业形成有效的评价体系.     

层次分析法AHP在供应商评价选择中的应用

运用层次分析法(AHP)对供应商的环境管理因素进行考察,并在此基础上进一步运用AHP综合考虑战略绩效、组织和企业的总体规划选择战略性合作的供应商。     

基于AHP的企业设备维修供应商选择

企业在进行设备维修管理时会根据一定条件在多个设备维修供应商中进行最优选择,由于每个设备维修供应商在信誉、价格、技术水平、柔性方面各具优劣点,难以简单地形成一个定论。层次分析法(AHP)是一种实用的定性与定量相结合的层次权重决策分析法,为企业设备维修供应商选择提供了科学依据,最大程度地避免了决策失误而带来的损失,具有一定的参考价值。     

多供应商选择中双层规划模型应用研究

供应商在供应链中起着举足轻重的作用,做好供应商的选择对于核心企业来说至关重要。在当今市场环境中,对供应商的选择不仅要考虑总成本最低,同时还要考虑供应商的信用风险。因此可以建立双层模型对供应商的选择进行优化,其中上层模型(U)以成本最低为目标,从而可以选择出费用小的供应商;下层模型(L)以供应商的金融风险为标准进行筛选,引入层次分析法(AHP)得到供应商综合信用指数。再将上层选择出的供应商进行重新选择,从而确定供应商及采购数量。     

企业物流战略系统评价的MAFMA方法探讨

在企业物流战略失败指标的评估分析中应用了层次分析法（AHP）、失败模式和效果危害性分析（FMEA）相结合的多属性失败模式分析法（MAFMA）,对可能导致企业物流失败的八个指标进行了分析,并给出了失败指标的总权数排序,得出了较为科学的结果,更有利于促进企业物流战略的成功实施。     

Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance

A growing number of studies and evidence from industries suggest that, besides managing the relationship with its suppliers, a buyer needs to proactively manage the relationships between those suppliers. In a buyer–supplier–supplier relationship triad, the buyer, as the contracting entity, influences the suppliers’ behaviors and the relationship between them. By considering the relationships in such a triad, we are able to gain a richer and more realistic perspective of buyer–supplier relationships. In this study, our goal is to examine supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads, focusing on how such relationships impact the supplier performance. We frame the supplier–supplier relationship as co-opetition—one in which competing suppliers work together to meet the buyer's requirements. We investigate the role of the buyer on such relationships, and how the buyer and co-opetitive supplier–supplier relationships affect supplier performance. We find mixed empirical support for our hypotheses. However, we are able to demonstrate the dynamics of supplier–supplier co-opetition in the buyer–supplier–supplier triad. We point out the need for further studies in this area.     

The micro-processes of supplier satisfaction: A longitudinal multiple case study

Supplier satisfaction has often been argued to be an important determinant for supplier performance in the buyer-supplier relationship. The micro-processes of how supplier satisfaction develops and how it relates to supplier performance, however, are not well understood. By means of a longitudinal multiple case study design of 18 buyer-supplier relationships, this paper provides insights into the micro-processes of how supplier satisfaction develops. Our findings provide several new insights. First, we observed how supplier satisfaction levels showed little change even though the buyer's behavior did not align with the supplier's expectations, thereby nuancing current conceptualizations of supplier satisfaction being a function of expected and realized relational value. Second, we show how intra organizational dynamics at the supplier influence the relationship between supplier satisfaction and supplier performance. Third, our findings give insights into the complex interplay between the relational and economic antecedents of supplier satisfaction.     

Mobilising supplier resources by being an attractive customer: Relevance,status and future research directions

For buying companies, supplier resource mobilisation is an essential process in gaining and sustaining preferential access to supplier resources. This editorial provides insights into the processes of supplier resource mobilisation and introduces three empirical studies on supplier resource mobilisation. We first introduce the supplier resource mobilisation cycle. This cycle may serve as a roadmap for purchasing and supply management (PSM) practitioners seeking to improve access to supplier resources. In addition, this article informs PSM scholars about the status of the supplier resource mobilisation literature and proposes avenues for future research. The cycle includes six stages: (1) becoming an attractive customer, (2) segmenting suppliers, (3) generating supplier satisfaction, (4) becoming a preferred customer, (5) engaging in supplier-oriented actions, and (6) integrating supplier resources. Finally, we introduce the articles in this issue that each examine a different stage of the supplier resource mobilisation process.     

供应商管理绩效综合评价模型研究

供应商管理工作的优劣对企业经营业绩有着重要的影响,这个现象越来越受理论界和企业界的重视。首先阐述了供应商管理的重要性,其次对有关供应商管理研究成果进行了归纳、分析及总结,最后建立了以供应商管理理念、管理制度、供应商评价选择、沟通管理、严格执行力、激励机制和发展战略为指标的供应商管理绩效综合评价模型,帮助企业正确认识自身供应商管理的优劣状况,从而达到强化供应商管理的目的。     

On the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market

Recent operations management and innovation management research emphasizes the importance of supplier integration. However, the empirical results as to the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market are ambivalent. To understand this important relationship, we incorporate two major recent developments. First, the literature has started to redefine supplier integration into two dimensions, supplier product integration and supplier process integration. Second, recent research has begun to examine spillover effects that extend beyond the direct costs and benefits of the supplier contract. Using survey data of 116 firms in the industrials, health care, and information technology industries, the results confirm our hypotheses and show that supplier product integration decelerates time-to-market while supplier process integration accelerates time-to-market. The results also show a positive relationship between supplier integration and the adoption of external technologies, which either decelerates or accelerates time-to-market depending on the level of internal exploration activities. Our research, thus, helps to open the ‘black-box’ of the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market, and provides a theoretically grounded explanation to the apparent contradictory results in prior research about the influence of supplier integration on time-to-market. In addition, we contribute to research on spillover effects by emphasizing that information technology adoption and assimilation is an important spillover effect of supplier integration.     

Supplier satisfaction and commitment: The role of influence strategies and supplier development

Although considerable research is dedicated to influence strategies and supplier development, a lack of empirical support exists of their effects on supplier satisfaction and commitment. This exploratory study aims to fill this gap by investigating first-tier suppliers in the German automotive industry. Supplier reactions to three different influence strategies and two types of supplier development efforts are examined. Results indicate that supplier commitment is affected by the use of promises and both human- and capital-specific supplier development, while supplier satisfaction is affected by indirect, other direct influence strategies and capital-specific supplier development.     

The moderating effects of supplier portfolio characteristics on the competitive performance impacts of supplier-facing process capabilities

We draw on the interorganizational relationship management literature to examine how contextual characteristics of the supplier portfolio (portfolio concentration, relationship length, and supplier substitutability) moderate the impacts of process alignment and partnering flexibility – two of a firm's key supplier-facing process capabilities to manage supplier relationships – on a product line's competitive performance. Our analysis of survey data on a firm's supplier portfolio for a major product line indicates that the impacts of process alignment and partnering flexibility on competitive performance are moderated by the three supplier portfolio characteristics. Specifically, while concentrated relationship portfolios, long-term relationships, and supplier substitutability amplify the positive effect of process alignment on competitive performance, concentrated relationship portfolios and long-term relationships attenuate the competitive benefits that firms derive from partnering flexibility. While long-term relationships and concentrated supplier portfolios enhance the competitive benefits of process alignment, operations managers also need to recognize the detrimental effects of these supplier portfolio characteristics on the competitive benefits of partnering flexibility.     

实施供应商管理 促进采购优化

供应链管理优化的起点是采购管理的优化,而采购优化中重要的组成部分即是供应商管理。文章首先讨论了供应商管理的目的和原则,以及供应商的整合和接纳;接着对供应商关系管理的实施原则和程序做了介绍,并指出应构建供应商监控体系作为保障;最后介绍某集团公司的成功实例。     

Do dependent suppliers benefit from buying firms’ sustainability practices?

In view of the limited understanding and research on the effect of sustainable supplier development practices on supplier performance, this study examines the impact that the implementation of assessment and collaboration practices have on supplier performance outcomes. In addition, we investigate the role that supplier dependence has on the performance outcomes of assessment on and collaboration with suppliers. Based on a sample of 129 Chinese manufacturing firms, we run a series of OLS regressions to test our theoretical models. The findings suggest that collaboration improves supplier performance, while assessment causes a deterioration. In addition, supplier dependence could be leveraged for suppliers to gain performance improvements through collaborative practices.     

A contingent theory of supplier management initiatives: Effects of competitive intensity and product life cycle

Direct investments in supplier development and close relationship building are the two major collaborative supplier management strategies for developing and accessing superior supplier capability. The impact of these two strategies, however, has not been uniform across firms, calling for a deeper examination of their relative effectiveness. Utilizing multiple theoretical frameworks, this study examines the relevance and effectiveness of the two collaborative strategies across the growth and maturity stages of the product life cycle (PLC). Specifically, the study analyzes the influence of competitive intensity as an antecedent to supplier development and relational initiatives, and the role of product life cycle as a moderator of the inter-relationships among competitive intensity, supplier development, relational initiatives, and supplier capability. Based on primary survey data, and discussion with practicing managers, the study finds that the individual and integrative effectiveness of supplier development investments (SDI) and relational orientation (RO) can be influenced differently by competitive intensity and PLC stage. In particular, RO can have a foundational role in motivating SDI for superior supplier capability, as also in safeguarding against supplier opportunism in the standardized product market context of the maturity stage. The managerial and theoretical implications of varied emphasis on the two collaborative supplier management strategies across the PLC stages are discussed.